US Air Force’s Experimental Hypersonic Aircraft Disappears Over Pacific Ocean

HAPPENING NOW: I don’t know what the hell is going on with the Falcon Hypersonic Test Vehicle 2, but the Air Force just lost it again. Last year, the first Falcon vanished over the Pacific Ocean, leaving absolutely no trace.

Now it has happened again. The Falcon HTV-2 launched today from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on top of a Minotaur IV Lite rocket.

After successfully separating from the missile, the Falcon reoriented itself for re-entry using the Reaction Control System. During the reentry, it used RCS and its aero controls to fly into Earth’s upper atmosphere, passing to the pull-up phase, reaching the correct altitude for the glide phase. In theory, during this phase the Falcon was going to test its aerodynamics and integrity flying at Mach 20, experimenting a temperature of 2000C — enough to melt steel.

DARPA controls at Vandenberg acquired signal from re-entry to some time into the glide phase. At that point, they lost telemetry with the aircraft never to get it back again, only 36 minutes from launch. According to DARPA, the Falcon has automated auto-destruction controls in case something goes wrong, but they still don’t know what has happened. Two hours ago at the time of this writing they haven’t followed up on their last Tweet.

Back in April 2010, the first Falcon flew for nine minutes before DARPA experienced loss of signal. According to the Air Force, “the vehicle’s onboard system detected a flight anomaly and engaged its onboard safety system-prompting the vehicle to execute a controlled descent into the ocean.”

Why did the Falcon fail again? To me, the answer is clear. In two words: Lex Luthor. [DARPA Twitter]

Discuss

(21 Comments)
  • [–]

    tom

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 9:41 AM

    Maybe it melted.

  • [–]

    light487

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 9:48 AM

    Maybe it went 36 minutes in to the past on account of going too fast and created a paradox? :)

    • [–]

      lulz

      Friday, August 12, 2011 at 10:07 AM

      +1

  • [–]

    Matt L

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 10:07 AM

    I found it! http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/08/is-this-a-ufo-on-the-bottom-of-the-ocean/

    • [–]

      Benno

      Friday, August 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM

      ^ Haha nice catch

  • [–]

    Jon

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 11:03 AM

    Maybe it was running Windows Vista.

    • [–]

      olearymo

      Friday, August 12, 2011 at 11:36 AM

      that just doesn’t even make any sense, Jon.

      • [–]

        Matt L

        Monday, August 15, 2011 at 5:18 PM

        I agree, even the smartest of all people working at NASA wouldn’t have been able to get vista to load in the first place.

    • [–]

      Ron Van Wegen

      Friday, August 12, 2011 at 1:12 PM

      Best comment EVAH!

  • [–]

    Jim

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM

    McFly where’s my Falcon?

  • [–]

    olearymo

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 11:37 AM

    It’s obvious. It broke the light barrier and is now existing simultaneously at all points in the universe.

  • [–]

    TSH

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 12:01 PM

    Clearly it divided by zero.

    Does anybody else see that vehicle and immediately think of “Flight of the Navigator”?

  • [–]

    Matt

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 2:48 PM

    Maybe it’s flying too fast for stable communications? I’d hate to see what sort of issues 20xSpeed of Sound can cause to the signal…

  • [–]

    adrian

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM

    The picture looks like an Apple ad.

  • [–]

    GarageKid

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM

    Circular references are a b!tch.

  • [–]

    Joel

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 5:14 PM

    That’s what happens when you fly at 88mph, Marty.

  • [–]

    Sam Timmins

    Friday, August 12, 2011 at 6:13 PM

    EIGHT-HUN-DRED AND EIGHT-Y EIGHT MILES PER HOURRRRRR!

    • [–]

      Emmett Lathrop Brown

      Friday, August 12, 2011 at 6:13 PM

      GREAT Scott!

  • [–]

    a guy

    Saturday, August 13, 2011 at 9:25 AM

    I’d love to see what a ‘controlled descent’ at mach 20 looks like.

    • [–]

      drew

      Sunday, August 14, 2011 at 4:04 PM

      so would the airforce

      • [–]

        GG

        Monday, August 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM

        rofl +1

Join The Discussion