The World’s Most Gargantuan Diesel Engine

It may shock you that a lot of the stuff we buy is made in China. In order to keep up with the mammoth demand for Snuggies, Shake Weights and other trappings of modern society, the Emma Mærsk makes the trip in four fewer days than the average container ship on a China-to-California run.

Oh, did I mention that the Emma Mærsk is the most vast container ship in the world? At over 1300 feet long, it weighs 170,974 tons and carries 11,000 6m shipping containers. To move this mammoth vessel at its cruising speed of 31 knots (versus the standard 18-20), you’ll need more than some puny nuclear reactor – you need the 109,000Hp Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C, a 13m tall, 27m long diesel engine.

The 14-cylinder, 2-stroke TRA96 aboard the Emma Mærsk weighs over 2300 tons and operates at a relatively pokey 102rpm. Unlike traditional diesel engines, the RTA96-C forgoes the camshaft, chain gear, fuel pumps and hydraulic actuators in favour of common rail technology. Common rail technology uses a high-pressure fuel rail to supply individual individual solenoid valves rather than a fuel pump feeding injectors. This allows the engine to perform better at low revs and consume less fuel. Still, even with these efficiencies, it still injects 184g of diesel in every piston for every cycle.

[Wartsila, RTA96-C Wiki, Common Rail Wiki, Sodahead]

Monster Machines is all about the most exceptional machines in the world, from massive gadgets of destruction to tiny machines of precision, and everything in between.

Discuss

(11 Comments)
  • [–]

    EckyThump

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM

    The Emma Mærsk, was launched in 2006! Fair enough she and her sisters are bloody big ships, but this is hardly breaking news!

  • [–]

    Gabriel

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 9:34 AM

    Holy crap that is big. Fck cleaning or repairing that thing

  • [–]

    Pedro

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM

    That’s a huuuuuge bίtch!

  • [–]

    Chris M

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 9:44 AM

    Wouldn’t want to be around when it decides to throw a rod ;)

  • [–]

    yup

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 10:58 AM

    So is that really (14Cyl*102rpm*184g)/1000=262.752kg/min of fuel?
    or 15.76512 tonnes an hour? That can’t be right can it? Somebody PLEASE correct me here…

    • [–]

      DK Son

      Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 11:50 AM

      srsly wtf right? And I felt bad for driving a car!

    • [–]

      EckyThump

      Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 11:52 AM

      Chech Here “http://www.robse.dk/pages/Emma/EmmaFami.asp” It uses a friggin lot of fuel, but it also has a friggin big tank,… #]

  • [–]

    Terry

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 1:53 PM

    It’s a two stroke? Holy crap.
    Also, sod the HP figure. What’s it’s torque figure?
    Nevermind, I’ll look it up. :-)
    Can’t quite get over the very normal look that engine has. Ok, a lot bigger but still… A flywheel and everything.

  • [–]

    Dan

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 3:31 PM

    Saw that boat on one of those ‘big things’ tv shows.

  • [–]

    Franz

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 8:50 PM

    Oil change? Better buy the big size oil pan.

  • [–]

    Chris

    Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 11:31 PM

    But that isn’t the 14RT-flex96C engine for the Emma Mearsk, if indeed it is a Wartsila RT-96C it is a 7 cyl version which makes it effectively half of the engine that pr0pels ‘Emma around the world

Join The Discussion