
The New York Times has a fantastic story today on the de-riskification of kids playgrounds, and how this may be hurting our children over the long haul.
From coast to coast (and internationally) we’ve changed the things children play on. Asphalt and sand have been replaced by rubber. Monkey bars, tall slides and swings, and Tarzan ropes have largely been removed. We took out the fun stuff and made it safe. We want to protect our kids from every bump and bruise and scrape and pain that might come their way.
It’s natural, right? You want to keep your kids from harm. As a new parent I know this firsthand. But all we’re doing is screwing them up long-term. This isn’t just, like, my opinion, man. It’s evidence-based. As the Times notes:
While some psychologists – and many parents – have worried that a child who suffered a bad fall would develop a fear of heights, studies have shown the opposite pattern: A child who’s hurt in a fall before the age of 9 is less likely as a teenager to have a fear of heights.
By gradually exposing themselves to more and more dangers on the playground, children are using the same habituation techniques developed by therapists to help adults conquer phobias, according to Dr. Sandseter and a fellow psychologist, Leif Kennair, of the Norwegian University for Science and Technology.
“Risky play mirrors effective cognitive behavioral therapy of anxiety,” they write in the journal Evolutionary Psychology, concluding that this “anti-phobic effect” helps explain the evolution of children’s fondness for thrill-seeking. While a youthful zest for exploring heights might not seem adaptive – why would natural selection favour children who risk death before they have a chance to reproduce? – the dangers seemed to be outweighed by the benefits of conquering fear and developing a sense of mastery.
“Paradoxically,” the psychologists write, “we posit that our fear of children being harmed by mostly harmless injuries may result in more fearful children and increased levels of psychopathology.”
This is a symptom of a larger epidemic. We live in a risk-averse era. We are all so terribly timid and afraid that something bad may happen. Don’t let them go too high, or too fast, or too far. Always wear your helmet and a long-sleeved shirt. Avoid fear. Avoid challenges. Avoid anything that’s not on your television, other than moderate amounts of exercise (but not too strenuous!) and a sensible diet.
We live in a world made over by lawyers and insurance contracts. And it’s killing us.
Taking risks is what makes society great. We need the risk takers. The entrepreneurs, the inventors, the explorers, the astronauts, the revolutionaries, for they are the ones who drive the world forward. And when we start our children off by teaching them that the worlds is a big scary place that will hurt them – that they can’t climb too high and that they always need a soft landing surface below – we’re weeding those adventurous types out at a very young age. We’re making them afraid of the world.
And the most screwed up thing about all this coddling? It doesn’t even work. Because parents and kids think these softened, lowered, neutered playgrounds are safer, they in turn take more risks in their play. Which ultimately leads to more injuries. As the Times reports:
“There is no clear evidence that playground safety measures have lowered the average risk on playgrounds,” said David Ball, a professor of risk management at Middlesex University in London. He noted that the risk of some injuries, like long fractures of the arm, actually increased after the introduction of softer surfaces on playgrounds in Britain and Australia.
I don’t care what the lawyers say. My kid? I’m taking her to the monkey bars. The higher the better.



















Mudze
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 8:02 AMBoth my two front teeth are permanently dead from a skateboarding accident.
A lot of money and time later, they look presentable.
And you know what? Worth it. Skateboarding, though I don’t do it anymore, gave me some major confidence boosts.
DK Son
Friday, July 22, 2011 at 9:57 AMBest. Sport. EVER!
alex
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 8:29 AMHere here
I used to be a joey scout leader (6/7yo for those that don’t know) and we were lucky enough to have the bush behind us. This meant I could take the kids for a “bush ramble” (ie a bushwalk) pretty much whenever I wanted to. We had an area that was full of rock formations that I would let the kids crawl through and they would have a great time (I grew up in those rocks so I know they are perfectly safe) but parents would be horrified that their kids might get hurt. People have got to stop protecting their kids so much and just let them be kids. Let them go for bushwalks, let them climb to the top of that very big tree, let them be kids! Your only young once. The signs around school zones lie – kids do bounce (maybe not when they get hit by a car though but that’s not what I’m talking about here).
d
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 8:44 AMI 100% agree with this. That said, I don’t have kids and when I do I will be terified of them getting hurt, but I know that the only reason I feel competent doing risky/difficult things is that I know that I have done it before or something similarly scary. a.k.a. free-climbing in a tree with a chainsaw for some spare spending cash.
EckyThump
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 8:48 AMI don’t know! seeing the phone footage they take knocking seven bells out of each other, they seem to have found their own way of toughening up! Not that I condone this kind of thing, I think it’s a product of X and Y gen not being disciplined properly. Let’s face it, you can’t even spank your kids any more! Add the increasing number of single mums out there and you have a situation where discipline is non existent!!
Travis
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 11:45 AMAs for the spanking that dependent on your parent. I’m what you would say part of the “Y” generation and my primary school hit us for mis-behaving as well as my mother and father. Do I hate them for it. Nope. In hindsight I can learn from if I didn’t at the time. Is it for everyone not really. Problem with your generation “EckyThump” I’m guessing ‘baby boomer’ by your comment is that you know only how to solve issues by force of hand rather than power words. Also don’t hate on single mums my parents split when I was 7 and me and 2 older brother and older sister all turned out perfect. All successful and have very well paying jobs.
EckyThump
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 12:49 PMYeah I’m a Boomer, and I did use corporal punishment on my child, who by the way turned out pretty damned fine, as did I! I don’t believe spanking is the only answer! I certainly didn’t thrash my kid, he was only spanked for doing something that was likely to be detrimental to his health unsupervised or as a very last resort. I didn’t say I thought any less of single mums, and I know they do it tough, but seeing the attitude and antics of youth today, not all, but quite a lot of whom are brought up by single mums, I believe the steadying influence and discipline of a father is missing! You say you were brought up by a single mum and turned out fine, do me a favour and tell her she did a good job! A lot of (not all) young mothers these days are getting pregnant for reasons that are either selfish or thoughtless and that is a detriment to the upbringing of children, specially boys. You seem to have a rather monocular vision of Boomers! Whom I’m sure are equally divided about the issue! My point is, there is no right or wrong, no black and white, it’s all a grey area!!
Deb
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 9:27 AMI wonder what it will take so that we don’t have to have insurance for every single little thing and for kids to be kids. I remember back in the 90s we wanted to go to a water park for a field trip and the year before us had gone but for our year we had to ‘get insurance’ and therefore couldn’t go (ridiculously unaffordable).. wtf?!
TSH
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 12:13 PMShould I ever reproduce, I expect my kids to eat dirt, graze their knees and elbows, bloody their noses and come home with bruises from playing at school or just being clumsy. Naturally I’ll be there to kiss it better, but they’ll have every opportunity to get grubby and stitches.
Although I *feel* it, I’ve never really been comfortable with “well, that’s how I grew up and I turned out fine” argument. I’m glad to see some evidence to back this up!
boc
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 1:18 PMThis doesn’t have anything to do with child safety – it’s about liability.
Councils and the like are scared they’ll get sued if someone has an accident.
Mike
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 2:15 PMYeah it’s all well and good in your own back yard, but on a government owned facility (lol, never thought I’d call a playground that) it’s a different story. People are just way too happy to sue others to try and make a quick buck.
Sam
Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 10:14 AMI think Boc hit the nail straight on the head. While the article is American (and obviously a few commenters are Americanised; seriously, “spanking”? Go back to yankee land! lol), and the situation is slightly different over there – the point in question is councils level of risk. Local governments have no doubt been sued for injuries incurred within public playgrounds, and looking to minimise chance of further financial liability. As rate payers, I’m sure everyone reading this and who has commented wouldn’t like their taxes going up, or being squandered on compensation to those who have sued following playground injury.
While I, and many of those who have already posted, would like to think they encourage “kids to be kids” – one thing you do have to bear in mind is, what would you do if your child did have a serious injury, with lasting effects (i.e. break their back and end up paraplegic)? I know I certainly wouldn’t be able to afford the immediate medical costs, and ongoing assistance required for a handicapped child.
Unfortunately this behaviour of “risk minimisation” is becoming more and more prevalent globally, and I don’t see it really slowing down anytime soon. Best I can really hope personally, is that our civil legal system is smart enough not to make dumb decisions and award compensation to those who exhibit stupid and reckless behaviour, and are looking for a fast buck rather than facing the consequences of their own actions.