Brought to you by

Pick One Of These Smart People-Approved NAS Alternatives

Apple’s Time Capsule refresh generated about as much chatter as a networked hard drive an possible drum up – but what if you don’t want a router/backup mutant? Here are three non-Apple data-ass-savers we vouch hard for:

LG’s Super Multi N2A2 NAS earned some high gushing from PC Mag, which loved its “oh-so-easy setup”, called it “more than sufficient for power home users and smaller business”, and beamed that “working within the web interface is a breeze. The interface is well designed, and any changes you apply are made quickly without any hiccups in the browser. I also like the fact that when you reboot or restart the NAS, a musical chirp sound indicates the unit is back online. The device also runs very quietly and remains cool even after running constantly for over 24 hours.”

A 2TB model will run you around $US260. [PC Mag]

TechRadar digs the Synology DiskStation DS210J, calling it “one of the most versatile, feature-packed drives we’ve seen”. They note it’s “awkward to open and fitting drives into its two bays is a chore” but has the features and reliability you’re likely looking for: “The expected FTP and HTTP servers, the DiskStation DS210J supports Apache, PHP and MySQL. It can control and record up to five IP cameras, and its Data Replicator 3 backup software enables you to set up scheduled backups.” Caveat: the $US250 tag coms sans hard drives. [TechRadar]

CNET’s taps the QNAP TS-259 Pro as its top pick, with “a simple, yet well-thought-out and aesthetically pleasing design” and “two front-access removable drive trays and supports two SATA hard drives.” Still, the QNAP’s a champ not because of its design, but its trove of backupy features. And the thing can double as a full computer with a little Linux tinkering – will your Time Capsule do that? No, silly. But you can probably ignore that lunacy – you just want a solid NAS. The QNAP is that: “The QNAP TS-259 Pro offers top throughput speed, an overwhelming list of useful features, and an excellent Web interface. Also, it supports hot-swappable RAID configurations, Apple’s Time Machine, and IP cameras for an automatic surveillance system.” I would say, yes, yes that does qualify as solid. And for $US600, it should. [CNET]

Discuss

(11 Comments)
  • [–]

    StevoTheDevo

    Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 10:25 AM

    Surely the most smart-person approved NAS is an old PC running FreeNAS..
    More powerful, expandable, capable and significantly cheaper.

    • [–]

      Brendan

      Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 11:07 AM

      These also have a significantly smaller power footprint than a PC. The QNAP TS-219 uses 20W of power when in use as opposed to say 200-400W for a small PC (or >600W in my case).

      Perhaps it should read “power-bill-conscious-smart-person”?

    • [–]

      Graeme

      Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 11:23 AM

      Stevo, a rather geeky (well, geekier than me) friend worked out that his FreeNAS running PC was costing just over $1 per day more in electricity than a 4 disk QNAP (mine) used. After a couple of years the cost of the NAS is covered by that difference. FreeNAS may offer a lot, but when I looked into it the QNAP offered everything that FreeNAS did (that was important to me) and I’ve since discovered a whole load more QNAP functions and add ons. I know this sounds like a paid advert for QNAP, it isn’t.

      • [–]

        Kane

        Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 1:06 PM

        I also messed about with FreeNAS including the latest version, one word “garbage” I spent more time sorting out permissions and other tidbits that wasted my time. Time is worth something same as the hydro bill. I now have a Synology 712+ with two 3 tb drives, no more wasted time. I can also expand to the drive bay later if needed.

  • [–]

    BS

    Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 12:13 PM

    I’m a huge fan of the Synology NAS’s. In fact I’m picking up a new one this weekend (was cheaper to purchase a 4-port NAS and 4*2TB HDD’s than it was to purchase equivalent HDD space for my current 2-drive Synology NAS).

    Looking at reviews prior to my purchase, the Synology and QNap products were both on par to eachother for usability (and far superior to other products), QNap pipped Synology as far as apparent construction quality of the device went, and only just pipped it on reliability too. The main reason Synology won out for me though was that its backup software for Windows is quite decent, and it supports TimeMachine for Mac (which the QNap apparently doesn’t).

    • [–]

      GDW

      Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 1:20 PM

      BS, QNap does support TimeCapsule, a standard feature. I have been using my TS-410 as a NAS and TimeMachine backup device for the past 6 months without any problems at all.

    • [–]

      potts

      Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 1:51 PM

      i also call BS, i’ve been using my QNAP 659PRO+ as a time machine for 3 computers for the past 6 months…

  • [–]

    Angus

    Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 12:52 PM

    DroboFS.

    • [–]

      [doa]

      Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM

      Agreed! And it supports Time Machine natively.

  • [–]

    Viddy

    Thursday, June 23, 2011 at 3:51 PM

    Drobo-schmobo…. sorry, but I did lust after one for a while…. until I found Synology. My new Synology 1511+ with the 510 expansion is absolutely kisk-ass, and WAY faster than the Drobo.

    Amazing read/write speeds. Easy iSCSI set-ups. More options and configs than you can shake a memory stick at. I have honestly not found anything else on the market that has such a complete solution as this set-up has.

    It even runs my Minecraft Server seemlessly – nice!

Join The Discussion