Lab-Grown Meat: It’s What’s For Dinner

In this week’s New Yorker, Michael Specter takes a great look at the world of in-vitro meat—grown in a lab, outside an animal body. It’s not a matter of if, but when. Will you eat it?

One of the pioneering figures in this field, Willem van Eelen, dreamed up many of the techniques used today, which rely on cell cultures to foster growth. Many are excited about the prospect of lab-grown meat for various reasons: It could be more efficient than raising and slaughtering animals. It could be healthier than the sickly animals used whose bodies are chock full of pathogens and anti-biotics. It could finally make PETA STFU.

But how is it done? Here’s how one lab in Eindhoven accomplishes the task:

The initial cells are typically taken from a mouse. (The Dutch have also focused on pork stem cells, because pigs are readily available to them, often reclaimed from eggs discarded at slaughterhouses or taken from biopsies.) Researchers then submerge those cells in amino acids, sugars, and minerals. Generally, that mixture consists of fetal serum taken from calves…After the cells age, van der Schaft and her colleagues place them on biodegradable scaffolds, which help them grow together into muscle tissue. That tissue can then be fused and formed into meat that can be processed as if it were ground beef or pork.

This lab meat is just like regular meat in that it can go soft and atrophy without activity. But instead of exercise, lab meat will receive electroshock therapy to stay fit. When asked about lab grown meat, one professor quoted in the article described it as “steak-flavored Jell-O.” Ew. And he wasn’t the only one down on the flavor.

Nearly every person I told that I was working on this piece asked the same question: What does it taste like? (And the first word most people blurted out to describe their feelings was “Yuck.”) Researchers say that taste and texture—fats and salt and varying amounts of protein—can be engineered into lab-grown meat with relative ease. For the moment, taste remains a secondary issue, because, so far, the largest piece of “meat” that has been produced in Eindhoven measured eight millimeters long, two millimeters wide, and four hundred microns thick. It contained millions of cells but was the size of a contact lens.” The specimen I saw was as visually stimulating as mouse droppings, and, if such a substance can be said to look like anything, it looked like a runny egg. How, I wondered, could those blobs ever feed anyone?

And what about the day that it finally appears in consumable form? What will it look like? Maybe it’ll take the form of Filet Mignon. Maybe not.

To grow ground meat—which accounts for half the meat sold in the United States—one needs essentially to roll sheets of two-dimensional muscle cells together and mold them into food. A steak would be much harder. That’s because before scientists can manufacture meat that looks as if it came from a butcher, they will have to design the network of blood vessels and arteries required to ferry nutrients to the cells.

But this is just the tech-y tip of this feature’s iceberg. Read the full article, which lays out all the social, nutritional and economical hurdles lab-grown meat will face on its path to commercial viability. [New Yorker]

[Photo Credit: Hans Gissinger]

Discuss

(12 Comments)
  • [–]

    Travis

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM

    As much as I love(And I do love me some dead animal) I would happily take up eating this provided it tasted good. I don’t like vegetarian meals because they’re vegetarian. I don’t like them because I don’t like the taste. It’s that plain and simple.

  • [–]

    Ash

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 9:13 AM

    I am a vegetarian, and although this is fake meat, ie, no animals were killed or harmed or cruelly treated, I wont be eating anything thats made in a lab. Long term, it just isnt going to be good for ones health. Eeewwwwwwwwwww.

    • [–]

      Paul

      Monday, May 23, 2011 at 2:21 PM

      I think that’s a bit of a naive comment, you don’t know that for a fact.
      It could in fact be a whole lot better for your health. The impact on the world as a result from methane gasses itself would be an improvement. Cows just for dairy perhaps?

      Bring on solid non fatty tender delicious molds of steak, made from lab meat!

    • [–]

      Steve

      Monday, May 23, 2011 at 9:27 PM

      This is incredibly ignorant. It reminds me about the huge scare of genetically-modified food in the 90s and how the luddites thought it would turn them into mutants.

      ALL food you eat has been ‘genetically modified’ to some degree, some more specifically than others. Even down at the ground level, domestication has ensured that the stuff we actually eat is nothing like its natural form, yet we’re healthier and living longer than ever.

      If food in a lab can be produced with a fraction the amount of cost, energy and effort and can be eaten with no adverse effects (and really, it’s chemically identical), then isn’t this a good thing? This sort of breakthrough could cure world hunger, but shame it isn’t up to your privelaged, first-world taste.

  • [–]

    Evan

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM

    The sooner we can get this stuff into production the better, because then we can stop killing all those cattle, sheep, pigs, chooks and whatever.

    The human race bears an enormous burden of cruelty to animals. And there are of course great environmental reasons for growing meat in a factory laboratory rather than out in the open where it can burp and fart!

    • [–]

      Nodeity

      Monday, May 23, 2011 at 10:57 AM

      Actually, there would be more benefit from the removal of methane gas being farted into the atmosphere. I hope they perfect this soon, cos the price of meat is currently ridiculously high… Oh, plus if they can make a leg of lamb without the bone… Mmm Mmm Mm

      • [–]

        Nodeity

        Monday, May 23, 2011 at 11:02 AM

        Sorry Evan, I didn’t quite get to the end of your post before I replied…. Usually I’m too slow to react, but this time, way too fast… :!

  • [–]

    TSH

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 9:51 AM

    I’d eat “lab-meat”, but it’d have to have the texture of actual meat as well as the taste.

    Having said that, this is an interesting alternative to TVP. Provided it’s a cheap alternative to meat, I’d consider a blend of this with real mince for pies and sauces. Especially since they could (presumably) tailor the nutritional profile of the stuff…

  • [–]

    nicky

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 10:03 AM

    no way in hell would i eat this, i think the mere mention of it is very disgusting

  • [–]

    jack

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 10:08 AM

    oh please put a disclaimer on your picture as i just almost throw up my breakfast!

  • [–]

    Gabriel

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 4:52 PM

    lol yeah i almost threw up looking at that photo too. Don’t know what it is about it as i can look at all sorts of inards with no problems..

  • [–]

    dodoman 1

    Monday, May 23, 2011 at 10:01 PM

    You think this will change anything in stead of animal’s being used for food it will be your turn next as this mite kill you and as the world is going backwards even if you think we are advancing in many ways We are heading back to be like the frist people nothing is not used including our dead body’s.

Join The Discussion