Facebook Is A Failure

Facebook wants to be your life. They want you to chat, exchange messages and publish your photos using their services. That’s ok. It’s a good concept. It’s just too bad their technology sucks to the point of being unusable at times.

There’s plenty of reasons to hate Facebook. And then some more. But I don’t care about those. To me it’s not about the privacy, their terms of service or Zuck’s dog.

The main reason is a critical one: Reliability. That’s where Facebook fails.

Being good is not good enough

At this point Facebook has 500 million active users. 50% of those login every single day, and they have an average of 130 friends each. They are associated or interact with 900 million objects, including pages, groups, events and community pages. Together, Facebook users create and share 30 billion new links, articles, wall posts, notes and albums. 30 billion new pieces of content every month. Breath.

Those are staggering numbers. All that information is stored in a giganormous distributed database, which ties everything together. The fact that a system like this works on a daily basis may seem impressive to most people, and it is. And the fact that it very rarely goes down—unlike other less-complex systems like Twitter—is good too.

But if you want to take over every aspect of people’s lives, good is not enough. Being just “good” is a failure. You have to be absolutely perfect, and that requires—first and foremost—that your messaging and chat facilities work flawlessly, with no loss of data whatsoever. Sadly, that is not the case.

Broken messages

For years now we have been suffering Facebook’s chat system, perhaps the worst in the industry. You can’t maintain a conversation without you or your buddy being logged off. Sentences, entire paragraphs don’t get delivered. I can’t count the times I’ve wanted to punch the screen and given up. Everyone else I’ve spoken to has had the same experience.

But now, with the merging of chat, the message box and their new mail address, things are even worse. During the last few weeks, some messages have been lost. Gone. They show up in the notifications panel, but they are nowhere to be found in the actual inbox. You get the first phrase but can’t access the rest. You see you have received a “Hey! Yes, I definitely would love to…” but nothing else. Would love to what? Would love to go out to the movies but can’t? Would love to strangle me? Would love to get me in bed? Would love to bake a cake? Would love to spread some jam on my monkeys? What would you love? What? What’s going on, in the name of the Holy Underpants!

Abysmal support

While you may think that Facebook communications are inconsequential, the fact is that they are not. Many people depend on Facebook to keep in contact with very important people in their lives. Heck, here at Gawker we even use it for work. Any reliability level below 100% is completely unacceptable. No computer system that wants to be an integral, irreplaceable part of our lives can fail like this. And data loss is absolutely out of the question.

On top of all this, there’s the issue of their user support. Facebook support pages are a joke, and critical issues like losing messages redirect you to a feedback form. I’m still waiting for an answer to my request, sent days ago. If you want to have people depending on you, you need to provide instant feedback. Not a black hole and the promise that your problem may get fixed one day.

Zuck and crew: Get your act together. It has been years since Facebook has had chat and it’s still unreliable. Messaging fails too, a “known bug” according to your own help pages. Now you want to further get us inside your cave with your mail services. But how can we trust you with yet another part of our communications when you have not been able to get the basics right in years?

We can’t. You can’t pretend to be the planet’s digital life hub and then offer services that fail and no technical support. Your objective requires that your system’s reliability is absolutely perfect. Less than that is not acceptable.

Until then, you are Failbook.

Discuss

(18 Comments)
  • [–]

    chill

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 10:20 AM

    These sound like the complaints of a paying customer. It may not be perfect, but it’s still pretty good for a FREE service. Maybe you need to stop relying on FB so much, there are other options out there, especially for chat and messaging.

    ..and with 500 million active users, were you expecting them to just drop everything and answer your support query?

    • [–]

      Daniel

      Friday, May 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM

      Messenger has been free for as long as I can remember and I’ve never had any such issues with it.

      I’m not sure if they still have it but at some point, they did have an in browser version as well, so that isn’t an excuse for Facebook’s chat.

    • [–]

      Aaron

      Friday, May 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM

      Even for a free service I think most people expect just the tiniest amount of competency in the most basic of services. Plenty of other programs that are free and perform similar functions work perfectly well.

      Considering Facebook has enough money to buy Africa and turn the whole continent into a water park called Zuckerland, you’d think they could invest some back into the software.

    • [–]

      skroo

      Friday, May 20, 2011 at 1:06 PM

      Wouldn’t say it’s free, you’re paying for their service with your personal info which is considered a commodity, that’s sold, traded and data mined!

  • [–]

    Selin

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 10:26 AM

    “Failbook” that no one can turn their back on…!

  • [–]

    ben

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 10:50 AM

    Its not like you are the customer anyway with Facebook…unless you use adblock :D

  • [–]

    Dan

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM

    Facebook has had it’s day. It’s slowly starting to die but people dont want to believe it.

  • [–]

    James

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM

    You should try being a developer… their APIs and documentation is some of the worst I have ever seen. Not to mention they like to make breaking changes and just not tell anyone. It’s awesome.

  • [–]

    Stefan

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 12:05 PM

    meh i hvent had any tech porblems with facebook, its a fairly useful service and im happy to use it.

  • [–]

    JT...

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 12:32 PM

    Sorry to throw a spanner in the works here buddy but no software company would be stupid enough to offer a 100% uptime. Also why are you relying on a non-commercial product for your commercial communications? Not the brightest idea is it.

  • [–]

    zahli

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 2:34 PM

    Agree with Chill, what the hell is wrong with Gizmodo’s editors? Do your job and prevent this crap from tarnishing a site with an otherwise sound reputation.

  • [–]

    Crowknee

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 2:59 PM

    What a lot of twaddle.
    I know Facebook bashing may be cool for techies, but try at least to have a focus or point to the article.
    What is talked about is purely anecdotal and seems very biased. It seems akin to bashing Maccas because their salads are a little bland.
    Facebook does it’s core mechanic very well – connecting people. If it didn’t, why do people use it?

  • [–]

    Ollie

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 3:29 PM

    A Troll article on Giz? jeezus.

    Who cares? It’s Facebook, not a cure for cancer.

  • [–]

    Wes

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM

    the facebook app on iphone is terrible!!! it never points you to the correct location in notifications

  • [–]

    Martin

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 10:39 PM

    Recently, I’ve had Facebook randomly delete messages, only show them on one device and no other, significantly delay messages, not notify me of them, and so on and so forth — so I can very much understand the frustration.

  • [–]

    jay

    Friday, May 20, 2011 at 10:45 PM

    I agree totally. It really is annoying that facebook has a monopoly in the social networking market, as it means you basically have to have it to contact friends online, despite the fact that it’s one of the buggiest and most awfully designed websites I’ve ever seen. god, I don’t know how many times I’ve cursed in frustration at that damned thing… and don’t get me started on the twin sidebars that CHANGE at random depending on what you’re looking at.. whose idea was that?!

  • [–]

    Ian

    Saturday, May 21, 2011 at 12:57 AM

    There’s no tech company I know that offers 100% uptime. How can you say that anything less is unacceptable when no one on the market offers that?

  • [–]

    doubleDizz

    Thursday, May 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM

    Pretty keen to jump on the next socnet bandwagon myself tbh

    So who’s it gona be? Diaspora or Google-something?

Join The Discussion