
Reports like this circulate every few months or so, usually the result of an interesting but non-Higgs discovery being misinterpreted by those outside the physics community. So under the circumstances, it’s not exactly encouraging that these latest Higgs rumours originated less in the way you’d expect the scientific discovery of the decade to, and more in the way, say, the latest rumour about how Joseph Gordon-Levitt is totally playing Hugo Strange in the new Batman movie gets started.
That’s right – it’s all from an anonymous internet commenter. LiveScience’s Mike Wall explains:
The controversial rumour is based on what appears to be a leaked internal note from physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a 17-mile-long particle accelerator near Geneva, Switzerland. It’s not entirely clear at this point if the memo is authentic, or what the data it refers to might mean – but the note already has researchers talking. The buzz started when an anonymous commenter recently posted an abstract of the note on Columbia University mathematician Peter Woit’s blog, Not Even Wrong. Some physicists say the note may be a hoax, while others believe the “detection” is likely a statistical anomaly that will disappear upon further study. But the find would be a huge particle-physics breakthrough, if it holds up.
That’s cause for some immediate scepticism – honestly, anything to do with the Higgs is grounds for some scepticism – but let’s look at what this result is purported to be. According to the note, the Large Hadron Collider’s ATLAS particle-detection experiment possibly detected the signal of the Higgs, and this signal appears to match several key characteristics that we expect for the Higgs.
However, the particle appears to have a much higher production rate that what the Higgs should have, according to Syracuse University physicist Sheldon Stone, who is not involved with the LHC’s work. That means it might not be the Higgs but some other particle, which Stone says could point to some new physics beyond our current understanding of the Standard Model.
That said, all this speculation is very premature and, according to Stone, not in keeping with good scientific practice. He explains:
“It is actually quite illegitimate and unscientific to talk publicly about internal collaboration material before it is approved. So this ‘result’ is not a result until the collaboration officially releases it.”
So then, all we can really do is wait for the full release of the ATLAS results to see what’s going on, assuming the whole thing isn’t just a hoax. But at least one CERN particle physicist – who is associated with the LHC but is not involved this particular experiment – is pretty much convinced that there won’t be anything to see here once the dust clears. Tommaso Dorigo lays out his detailed reasoning in this post, but his conclusion is quite simple and a little bit bold:
“I bet $US1,000 with whomever has a name and a reputation in particle physics (this is a necessary specification, because I need to be sure that the person taking the bet will honour it) that the signal is not due to Higgs boson decays. I am willing to bet that this is NO NEW PARTICLE. Clear enough?”
There’s plenty of reason to still be optimistic that the Large Hadron Collider will find the Higgs boson. But, as a general rule, it’s not a bad idea to assume that, when the news does come, it probably won’t be from a random note posted anonymously on the internet. But hey, stranger things have happened – just give me a moment to think of one…
Via LiveScience. Image via isgtw.
Republished from io9


















Anadish Kumar Pal
Wednesday, April 27, 2011 at 7:44 AMThe discovery of gravity’s exact mechanism along with that of dark matter has already taken place, way back in autumn 2010. I know from my theoretical understanding that it is impossible to find any traces of Higgs boson as a quantum particle in the Hadron collider, neither can it show the existence of dark matter. The details of my discovery of how gravitation exactly works, http://www.anadish.com/ , and how it is produced in the framework of quantum mechanics are lying in wraps with the USPTO and I can only make it entirely public after there is clarity on how the USPTO is going to settle the issue of secrecy on my application. I consciously did not report to any peer-reviewed journal, fearing discrimination, because of my non-institutional status as a researcher. However, if the USPTO also continues with their non-committal secrecy review under LARS Level 2 (find the PDF of Private PAIR of the USPTO on my site), then, anyway, my discovery may not get published for a long time to come, in spite of me having filed the US patent application (US 13/045,558) on March 11, 2011, after filing a mandatory Indian patent application on January 11, 2011. Till, I find a clue to come out of the maze of government regulations, unless, of course, the USPTO decides to put it out of secrecy.
Dave
Monday, July 25, 2011 at 1:09 PMYour a Quack. Go away!