Nuclear Technology Isn’t All Bad

The Fukushima crisis was a brutal wake-up call about the risks of nuclear power, and it’s really got us all down. But that doesn’t mean we should all panic and disregard the amazing possibilities of nuclear technology.

Nuclear innovation is like the ocean: Respect it and take precaution, but don’t avoid it out of fear. There have been some awesome breakthroughs thanks to cutting-edge research, which not only includes the next generation of nuclear reactors, but also things like space travel, medicine, and objects you use in your daily life.

When will we see these emerging technologies? Some we could see in a few years. Others may be decades away. But they they all share the common traits of promise and potential. Here’s a look at our 10 favourite nuclear technologies of the future.

Thorium
While thorium isn’t a reactor (it’s an element) many see it as the future of nuclear power. Four times more abundant than naturally occurring Uranium, Thorium can either be converted into the proper isotope of the aforementioned element (U-233), or be directly used as fuel in a reactor. The KAMINI reactor in India currently runs on Thorium-based fuel. [Source]

Pebble Bed Reactors (Very High Temperature Reactors)
Pebble Bed reactors are part of a Generation IV class of reactors called Very High Temperature Reactors. What makes the Pebble Bed reactor special is that the uranium fuel is compressed into tennis-ball-sized spheres that wont melt until it hits 4000C (well above the 1600C peak theoretical temperature of any reactor incident). Because of this high temperature capacity and lack of any moving machinery in the reactor, if an emergency occurred, plant operators could shut off the reactor and vacate. The reactor would passively cool on its own. [Source]

RKA Nuclear Spaceship
The Russians have big plans for a spaceship which uses nuclear propulsion designed for missions into deep space. In theory, the craft would have an onboard nuclear fission reactor, which would in turn heat the liquid hydrogen fuel. If successful, journeys to Mars would become much more feasible due to the significant efficiency increases. Russia claims that once they finish their design in 2012, it will take nine years and $US600 million to construct the ship (it should be noted that some are skeptical about the time and money such an endeavor would consume). [Source, Image]

Supercritical Water Reactors
Supercritical water reactors are lusted after because they are considerably more efficient and give off less heat than current water-cooled reactors. The secret sauce is called supercritical water – an ambiguous state of matter that can move through solids like gas and dissolve matter like liquids – running through the system. In the case of a reactor, it means that supercritical water won’t boil and doesn’t require pressurisation, two good things for safe nuclear reactors. The problem is, supercritical water is at a higher risk of exploding while reaching the supercritical state, and overall, is less stable than a pressurised water reactor (but more stable than the boiling water reactors used at Fukushima). [Source]

Radionuclide Cancer Therapy
Radionuclide Therapy is quickly becoming a popular new idea for cancer treatment, because of the precise method in which doctors can internally deliver cancer-killing radiation to targeted parts of the body. By selecting the proper radionuclides, and pairing them with the proper cells, such as antibodies, the radiation carrying organisms will only go after abnormal cells. That means it not only kills the tumor, but also any stray cancer cells in the vicinity of the tumor, while leaving unaffected organs and tissue alone. [Source, Image]

Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor
Fast reactors are different from water-cooled reactors in that they don’t require moderating rods (usually made of graphite) in order to slow down neutrons and sustain a nuclear chain reaction. The gas variant also uses the mostly non-reactive helium to regulate core, which can withstand high temperatures at very low pressures. But what makes a gas-cooled fast reactor especially appealing is that it is a breeder reactor: meaning it not only generates electricity, it also has the ability to generate nuclear fuel from uranium/plutonium/thorium. [Source]

Nuclear Powered Cars
Uranium nitride is a newly-discovered compound that currently has scientists excited because of its ability to break carbon-hydrogen bonds and increase the energy output of gasoline. However, the compound destroys itself in the process, which is a current roadblock to future implementation. [Source, Image]

Energy Amplifier (Subcritical Reactor)
The idea behind an energy amplifier is that a beam from a particle accelerator would blast the thorium atoms with outside neutrons, and would not require the element to reach a high temperature at which it hovers between a gas and a liquid. Not only would the reaction generate enough power to run the particle accelerator and have surplus energy, but would leave significantly less nuclear waste (such as plutonium, which some fear can be repurposed into nuclear weapons). [Source, Image]

Small Modular Reactor
Many Small Modular Reactors use (or would use), many of the technologies used in current nuclear reactor designs. However, what makes small modular reactors appealing to forward-thinking nuclear power advocates, is their (wait for it…) smaller size, which means that a crisis at a single power plant would have less of an effect on the surrounding area. Of course there’s the challenge of scaling out those power plants to support the same number of people as a larger station. One promising company, the Oregon-Based NuScale, uses a pressurised water reactor for their stations, which is considered safer than the boiling water reactors used in Fukushima. [Source]

Nuclear Batteries
Betavoltaic batteries are coveted by innovation freaks because they promise to power personal devices for up to 30 years. One company, Widetronix, is designing a tritium-powered battery – for use in military sensors and medical implant devices – that captures electrons produced during tritium’s natural nuclear decay and converts that to energy. No scary reaction necessary. [Source]

Discuss

(12 Comments)
  • [–]

    Justin Tutty

    Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 10:20 AM

    no surprises here : the nuclear industry has been over-promising and under-delivering since go.

    Here’s a few quotes for you :
    Remember “power too cheap to meter”?
    and how about : “We know that the paper-moderated, ink-cooled reactor is the safest of all.”

    I remember well how similar stories about imminent reactor designs that will address safety concerns were in high volume 25 years ago. I expect we’ll hear a lot about them next time we witness catastrophic reactor failure too.

    Yes, the indiscriminate impacts of this industry must be addressed with respect and precaution, but when applying these principles, let’s do so with our eyes focussed on the realities of the reactors currently dotting the globe, rather than the promises (fantasies) about next-generation designs.

    • [–]

      Flux

      Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 11:15 AM

      That’s hardly a fair assessment, Justin – the safer cleaner reactor designs you heard about 25 years ago are actually largely the same ones we’re looking at today. They were never implemented because undereducated populations rejected the perceived ‘nuclear bogeyman’, so govts stopped building new nuclear plants and we’re left with the hazards of aging reactors.

      Also, you seem to ignore the notion that new reactors are what will save the old ones – by replacing existing installations with far safer tech, even by reprocessing waste back into usable fuel. Since when is innovation NOT the answer?

      • [–]

        Justin Tutty

        Friday, April 1, 2011 at 9:35 AM

        When you’re too far down the rong track.

    • [–]

      matt

      Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 11:24 AM

      the Japanese plant is 40 years old…

  • [–]

    Will

    Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 12:32 PM

    You forgot Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR):

    http://energyfromthorium.com/about/

    Offers significant advantages over the solid fuel thorium reactor mentioned above, including greater efficiency, self-moderating core (theoretically impossible to melt down), simple fuel handling and waste disposal, and ability to both burn existing nuclear waste and weapons-grade fuel and create useful nuclear elements (molybdenum-99, plutonium-238 etc).

    Definitely worth a look.

  • [–]

    TheBlack

    Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 1:04 PM

    Mmmm propaganda.
    Anything that gives off a harmful waste products to the Environment and anything living in it (IE Humans). Should not be used…. PERIOD.

    Stop using harmful technologies that cost so much damn money that isn’t worth the risk… And go with a much cleaner, cheaper, more efficient technology like Cold Fusion.

    • [–]

      RB

      Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 1:52 PM

      Quite possibly a troll, but I’ll bite…

      “Anything that gives off a harmful waste products to the Environment and anything living in it (IE Humans). Should not be used…. PERIOD.”

      So Coal, Oil, Gas Power Plants are out too? Where are we going to get our electricity from?

      “more efficient technology like Cold Fusion”

      According to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

      Cold fusion refers to a proposed nuclear fusion process of unknown mechanism…

      …proposed nuclear fusion process…

      …proposed…

      A more valid suggestion would have been Solar Thermal or Wind Generated Power, but thanks for playing!

    • [–]

      Wef

      Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 2:23 PM

      Oh nice. As if coal-powered generating stations didn’t shower us with radiation and carcinogens – more than nuclear stations, in fact. Then all the coal-miners dying in the mines.

      Even more dangerous than coal (more deaths per mega-watt) is hydro.

      Cold Fusion? – come back in 50 years and see.

      Well thought-out response! Not!

    • [–]

      Akra

      Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 2:57 PM

      If only we could harness wishful thinking….

  • [–]

    huu

    Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 3:17 PM

    Since human first crawl out of the caves and start to advance, every technological advancement come with danger, but instead of afraid of it we learn from every mistake we make. Look arround you RIGHT NOW, every single thing in the room can kill you if not contructed properly. Question: What happen if you room fill with water right now? Nothing, you wont be electricuted because the fuse would of trip to prevent such happening, because it happen before and it kill people that why we have such safety in place. After Japan we learn, and probably can build better one now.

  • [–]

    Garauld

    Friday, April 1, 2011 at 7:33 AM

    It is a tragic thing that happened over there in Japan, but all the news has been primarily the leakage of radiation and not of the plight of the displaced. Nobody has died from radiation as yet over there. And where in the news do you see the plight of the number of coal miners that have died over the last two weeks? How many? At least 46 that I have counted – 45 in Pakistan and one in the US. Coal is dirty, radioactive and 20% of it has to be reburied somewhere as ash waste…

  • [–]

    Demitri

    Tuesday, April 5, 2011 at 1:12 PM

    Fission reactors are old. what about Fussion reactors, so much more safer. It used heavy water and a magnetic field to constant squeeze it so it superheats and creates a nuclear reactions which is fussion. and after hydrogen atoms fuse we get carbon. But it takes more energy to fuse carbon attoms, which i think produces iron. not sure about that. Cheers

Join The Discussion