
Nokia considered three OSes to move to: MeeGo, Android or Windows Phone 7. In talking about Android, Elop admits to its strength but also points out some weaknesses:
“There’s something happening there. There’s no denying that. [But]our sense was differentiation could be a pretty big challenge. The risk for commoditisation would increase dramatically.”
Nokia knew that it had arrived much too late to the Android party and also knew it was already a crowded space. Creating a standout Android phone would already be difficult given the years other companies had invested and even more difficult given the maul of Android phones available. Even Android phone makers would admit that it’s hard to stay at the top of the Android power rankings—hell, doesn’t it seem like the “best Android phones” only has a lifespan of a month before it gets dethroned? Nokia saw Google getting all the profits while hardware gets commoditised.
And sure Windows Phone 7 has similar hardware partners with Android but Nokia felt it could differentiate its handsets by dropping in Nokia specific features like their Navteq location-based services.
But most important to Nokia was that they didn’t want to lose the smartphone wars to Apple and Google without giving it an honest fight. Choosing Android would mean that they’d become a bit player in a two-horse race (Apple vs Google). Choosing Windows Phone means they’re hoping to turn it into three. It might be too late and maybe Nokia had to sell their souls, who knows, but I respect any one who goes down swinging. [AllThingsD]



















Andrew
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 8:38 PM“It might be too late and maybe Nokia had to sell their souls, who knows, but I respect any one who goes down swinging.”
All this negative talk about the deal is out of place. So far the single post of the concept phone on engadget has seen more than twice the comments of the antennagate press conference.. and it’s Apple fanboy central over there and was the biggest story last year. Reguardless of any misgivings about the fall of Symbian and MeeGo, the overwhelming respose is “Nokia + WP7 = Sex”. It won’t be difficult to translate that into bank.
Stephen Earp
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 9:59 PMAgreed – and well said too. “Nokia + WP7 = Sex” is totally truth to the market that had so much respect for their hardware innovation. Cant wait to see what goes down in the coming year.
Doofus
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 3:52 AMLet me finish that for you Andrew – “Nokia + WP7 = Sex with your cousin
wsDK_II
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 7:31 AMnice trolling :)
on a serious note though, im glad that the share prices for Nokia and Microsoft are falling cause i am investing!
gromit
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 9:28 AMTaking that algebra a bit further:
Nokia = sex – WP7. And since nearly all sex takes place without WP7 present (at least in my experience), then mathematically, the equation tends to
Nokia = sex
substituting “Nooky” for “Sex”
Nokia = Nooky
so that’s where the name comes from?
hugh
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 8:42 PMthey didnt im down swinging Elop through the match. The knock out shot would have been release the rumored n9.
Dominic Trinajstic
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 9:01 PMAgreed. WinMo over MeeGo or Android is a bad choice.
PhoneUser
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 9:07 PMI’m surprised to find almost nothing written — neither here nor elsewhere, around the Net — about an apparent conflict of interest. Based on public records, Mr. Elop is Microsoft’s 7th-largest individual shareholder with a stake currently valued at well over USD $3,000,000
Here’s the current info. Individual stakeholders are in table #3.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/company/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas/institutional-ownership
Jorge Figueroa
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 2:14 PMActually Elop himself spoke about that at WMC
dace
Sunday, February 13, 2011 at 9:20 PMNokia have supremely failed with this decision. They make the best phone hardware out (next to apple in my view) and would have cleaned up with an android based os on that basis alone.
Brennschluss
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 12:48 AMDigital Equipment made a similar decision regarding its OS thirty years ago when they rejected Unix. It turned out to be a very bad move. HTC seems to have found a successful middle ground by differentiating with HTC sense while still fulfilling the android customer’s “universal expectation”. Why is it that so many hardware guys just don’t get it.
koko
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 12:56 AMNokia made the wrong choice…they hesitated for a long time…. it is over for them as world leaders
Merv
Monday, February 14, 2011 at 11:13 AMToo early to call the end of nokia. This could be the boost that wp7 needs. Should be very interesting
Steffen
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 1:22 AMWindows Phone is great, so i think it was the right choice.
Simon
Wednesday, April 4, 2012 at 3:55 PMI loved nokia phones, will never buy another now. Can’t stand windows and the mobile edition sucks.