
The Higher Cost Will Pay Itself Off

Solid-state disks are considerably more expensive than hard disks, which is likely the biggest barrier for most people. 128GB SSDs will generally run you about $US200 and 256GB will run you closer to $US500. While this cost might feel prohibitively high, it’s not as bad as you think.
Let’s take the higher cost of $US500 for example and say you’ve purchased a 256GB SSD to upgrade your laptop. Straight out of the gate you have a leftover internal hard drive that you can either sell for about $US50-75 or turn into an external. Being optimistic, you’re down to $US425. That’s not a big savings overall, but if you upgrade your laptop every 1-2 years you can keep using the same SSD. When you buy a new laptop, remove its hard drive and swap it with the SSD in the old one. The old laptop you’re going to sell will now have a larger capacity hard drive and you can charge a little extra when you sell it. Over three sales you’ll probably make an additional $US100, bringing us down to $US325. When the time comes to upgrade to a new SSD, you can sell the original SSD alone or with your old computer. Mark up the cost of the machine by $US325 and you’ve covered your original costs. $US325 for an SSD laptop upgrade is a pretty good deal. Of course you’ll need to buy a new SSD, but you’ll have made back your money at this point while using your SSD for several years.
Note: SSDs don’t last forever and performance can degrade over time with some models, so make sure you get a high-quality SSD that’s rated for a long life if you’re going to do this. You can use a tool like SSD Life to keep an eye on things.
Size Doesn’t Matter (Sort of)

After asking how much hard drive space you actually need in your computer, I came to realise that you, our readers, are a bunch of insane hoarders. That’s OK! I like to hoard stuff too, but I’d never pay extra for more than 256GB of disk space. When you have more space, you’re most likely going to use it. This puts you in the habit of storing useless files on your computer that you either don’t need or rarely need. It’s like living alone in a two-bedroom apartment just so you can use the extra bedroom as a storage closet. For the most part, you can get rid of a lot of the files you think you need.
For some of us, we have a massive collection of crap we find comforting. For others, the space is necessary for large media projects. I fall into both of these categories, but external drives solve the problems far better than trying to manage huge amounts of data on the main internal drive. First of all, you get the benefit of virtually limitless space for your stuff. Second, you can organise your stuff by the drive if that helps. Third, if you need additional protection offered by, say, RAID, you can get that with external drives whereas you’re not going to get that with a laptop and some desktops. Ultimately, the size of the internal disk in your computer can actually be bad for you after a certain point. For me it’s around 250GB (I only use 200GB but I like to keep about 50GB of space free). For some of you it may be as little as 128GB, a size where SSDs are significantly more affordable.
In the end, the size limitations are going to be better for you. You can horde your crap on external drives, stay more organised, and reap the benefits of a super-fast solid-state disk in your laptop or desktop computer.
When you decide to take the plunge, be sure to read how to take full advantage of your solid-state drive.
Republished from Lifehacker




















nicholas
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 10:28 AMi only use the SSD for the OS and i have a 2TB for everything else
matt
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 10:43 AMbahahaha, I have never seen someone clutch at straws so much in trying to justify price! :D
completely ignoring the fact that the VALUE of everything will shrink over time (so the new ‘bigger’ drive in your next laptop will probably be worth what your current one is now…), not to mention that… you could do most of that anyway and still be $500 up from not buying the ssd!
still though. imaginative justifications for the purchase of awesome tech is what I come to Giz for.
also, with the size thing, you REALLY don’t need more than 256 gig. not at the moment, not until games are like 100gig each.
and it is the gamer that will struggle the most. MAYBE someone doing media EDITING also, but when it comes to just hoarding tons of media and crap to view later, you don’t need a fast drive for accessing that. a WD Green drive would do fine!
and with say, steam. all your games in one folder, it might look cumbersome to try and manage just having the current game you are playing on the fast drive. but in fact, it isn’t. the data for most games is just stored in the steamapps folder, in it’s own nice little folder. the games you aren’t playing, you can just backup somewhere else, then copy them back when you wanna play them!
its also apparently a big part of MS’s next OS, using things like SSDs as a sort of cache. so it will automatically move your most used files onto the SSD internally, without you having to worry about it.
If I used my laptop as my main, I would totally buy an SSD!
Art Nau
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 11:36 AMagree
good manual for sales people tho
Steve
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 4:01 PMAgreed.
I read through this flabbergasted. Is the writer some sort of tech-limiting apologist? Or is it just conveniently timed with the MacBook Air launch?
There are so many hoops consumers are expected to leap through for SSD to be acceptable? He’s expecting people to buy overpriced SSDs NOW? To somehow break even? What the hell.
Seeing as HDD is almost halving every quarter, how the hell is this a good idea?
Ward Paterson
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 2:22 PMThe biggest limitation with SSD righ now is that theres no TRIM support for RAID setups.
As a result, you’ve either got to rely on poorly implemented Garbage Collection in the sandforce controllers by leaving your computer idle and not sleeping for a period of 8-24hours, or ensure you don’t use all of the drive space – leaving 20-30gb for minimising slow down.
Then there’s also formatting the SSD drives. Formatting them the wrong way (eg, writing 00′s in stead of FF’s) could dramatically slow the drive down…
Its a buyer beware situation with SSD. If you’re running a stand alone drive, you’re pretty safe unless you format it wrong.
If you’re running a RAID setup, chances are 4-6 months down the track your PC will be performing close to mechanical drive speeds and lower than a single SSD setup….
Food for thought.
jason
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 6:17 PMi am eager to get an SSD im hoping it will allow my media browser cache to load much faster.
I dont understand people filling up their primary drive, it should only have the OS and some applications all other data should be on secondary disks. 2TB disks are under $150 now, there is no excuse not to have a secondary disk
for my uses i should be able to get away with a 60GB for OS and a few TB for storage
id love to build a new PC right now, there is so much good stuff around.
James
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 6:47 PMI bought an 64GB SDD recently for about $150 bucks and I love the speed and don’t regret it one bit. I haven’t really used the drive for gaming yet just OS and couple apps due to the size but I like matt’s idea on “steam” – I only ever have two or three games being played at anyone time so I think I may get anyway with OS and steam with the other games backup – I’d written this off due to the size of my drive but I think I should have just enough (I keep the OS pretty clean).
The three I’m thinking of come to about 20gbs
Thanks Matt
Anthony Tam
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 8:49 PMHow ironic. If you care so much for speed, you wouldn’t be shoving an SSD into a laptop, but rather a desktop where all your other fast components (mem, overclocked CPU and GPU) are.