Is The Internet Sustainable When Everyone On Earth Uses Over 3 Gigabytes Of Data Per Day?

As the internet gets more data intensive—the cloud, streaming media, etc.—how much data will we use in the future? A computer scientist crunched the numbers and came up with 3 gigabytes of data per day. Is that sustainable?

Though we tend not to mention it in the same breath as transportation, heating our homes, or lighting our offices, downloading data consumes energy too. As more people turn to the internet for increasingly data-intensive activities, computer scientists from the U.K.’s Bristol University decided to crunch the numbers and project the ultimate impact on the environment. The results are staggering.

The researchers assumed that people in the developed world would maintain the same level of media consumption, but move it entirely to the cloud, and that the global middle glass would reach a similar level of data use. With those assumption in place, the researchers reckon that each person will demand, on average, over 3 gigabytes of data per day. That’ll come to 2,570 exabytes per year for the global population, by 2030. (An exabyte is a billion gigabytes.) The average power needed to sustain such activity would be 1,175 gigawatts. It takes an entire large coal-fired power plant to produce just one gigawatt of energy, so imagine 1,175 of those churning out power just to fuel the world’s data hunger.

Big numbers—as any global figures are—and they’ve led researchers Chris Preist and Paul Shabajee, who present their findings today at the IEEE CloudCom 2010, to propose innovative strategies for containing consumption. Intriguingly, Preist and Shabajee talk about cloud computing in terms more familiar to recycling programs: they want us to change our behaviour to reduce “digital waste.” Taking a page from behavioral economics and the authors of the popular book Nudge, they advocate “persuasive” web design that nudges users into choosing less data-intensive options—avoiding that high-res photo when a medium-res would suffice.

“One of the main messages of my paper is that the main solution for this is to continue to make servers more powerful and more efficient,” Preist tells Fast Company, adding that it’s important for those in “green IT” to continue making efficiency improvements. “The impressive efficiency gains that have been achieved so far have been overshadowed by increased demand for broadband services.”

Most reports that look into the future of any sort of consumption have apocalyptic overtones. But Preist, in the end, is relatively optimistic. As he said recently in a release: “This research suggests that in a future which is increasingly environmentally constrained, there is still a good chance that broadband connectivity can be provided equitably to the majority of the world.” Not so of other realms, he points out: “This contrasts significantly with other aspects of western lifestyle, such as aviation, which could become increasingly the preserve of the wealthy.”

The usual caveats of scientific research apply: namely, more is needed. Though the academics tried to take all the variables into account—foreseeing an era when high-def online video is the norm, for instance—further investigation is needed into the role that mobile devices play in network energy use, and in the emissions caused by manufacturing the technology that enables us to access the Web in the first place.

[Image: Flickr user batintherain]

Fast Company empowers innovators to challenge convention and create the future of business.

Discuss

(9 Comments)
  • [–]

    Dean

    Sunday, December 5, 2010 at 4:49 PM

    3 gigabytes will take about 4 minutes on a 100mbit/s NBN.

    • [–]

      icurafu

      Monday, December 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM

      Dean, if everyone was to download 3GB in a best case secenario (P2P) the network would not give the full 100 Mbit/s. We would be sitting at something like the old 56Kb/s speed.

      But it would be an interesting casestudy of how quickly you could spread a 3GB file to everyone in Australia on the 100 Mbit/s NBN.

  • [–]

    Steve

    Sunday, December 5, 2010 at 5:48 PM

    The concept of some cloud-based service has always seemed wasteful to me anyway. While it’s fine to store my contact details and measly email inbox online, what about people who stream their entire music libraries, or even video? Everywhere they go, when a hard drive might suffice?

    Perhaps this is from Australian sensibilities with our capped plans and desire to be more data efficient, but services like Zune pass and Apple TV just seem crazy-wasteful. And obviously the power needed to send it to your home everytime you hit ‘play’ has to come from somewhere.

  • [–]

    simon c

    Sunday, December 5, 2010 at 7:57 PM

    Use local compute cycles, save the planet
    Use local compute cycles, keep dirty 3rd party hands off your data

    Need to send data to a friend who will see tommorow anyway? Use a usb drive and hand deliver…for that personal touch :D

    • [–]

      Damo

      Monday, December 6, 2010 at 10:19 AM

      x 2 @ Simon C

  • [–]

    adrian

    Monday, December 6, 2010 at 1:15 AM

    I don’t use any online storage crap anyway, I prefer to be in possession of my own data

  • [–]

    olearymo

    Monday, December 6, 2010 at 9:36 AM

    Yeah I gotta agree with the sentiments on cloud being a bit wasteful. Cloud is great for syncing of contacts, etc etc. But actual files? Like videos, images, programs etc? I mean really, do they need to be in the cloud?

    Like someone above said, keep it local. It’s better for everyone and safer for your data.

    (Of course, make sure you back up)

  • [–]

    Mordd

    Monday, December 6, 2010 at 10:12 PM

    How much of that is ads and spam though, find a way to effectively block the junk and I bet the data usage average drops drastically.

  • [–]

    Sylvester Thang Fedor

    Tuesday, December 7, 2010 at 10:09 AM

    ban porn from the torrents, save 90% of data usage.

Join The Discussion