AT&T Mum On Soldier’s $US16,000 Mobile Phone Bill

The details are still being brought to light on this, so don’t go taking up torch and pitchfork just yet, but apparently there’s some poor soldier in Afghanistan with a $US16,000 bill that AT&T will not budge on whatsoever.

The soldier, Pfc Jose Rivera, deployed to Forward Operating Base Shindand in Afghanistan under the impression that his overseas calls would only be billed at a $US4.95/month rate. Many calls to his wife and newborn child later, the bill was much, much more than that rate would have worked out to, to the tune of sixteen grand.

Ultimately, this sounds like a misunderstanding. Rivera, who does not speak English as his first language, apparently misunderstood what AT&T said, as the actual billed rate looks to be about $US5/minute for international calls from his FOB to the U.S.

Rivera’s commanding officer, Capt. Evan Brainerd, understands that a misunderstanding probably took place, but has so far been unable to help his soldier out. AT&T customer service has been decidedly, well, automated with its responses to Rivera and Brainerd. A request to lower the bill to $US9,000 was denied without reason. Requests for more information about why the account was not flagged for excessive usage or why warnings were not sent (something AT&T does do for excessive data plan usage) remain unanswered. [CNET, Image: Capt. Brainerd]

Discuss

(9 Comments)
  • [–]

    Rob Bailey

    Monday, December 20, 2010 at 10:25 AM

    I find it hard to believe that any person in their right mind would think that phone calls from overseas would cost $4.95/month.

  • [–]

    Bails

    Monday, December 20, 2010 at 10:47 AM

    “Rivera’s commanding officer, Capt. Evan Brainerd”

    That has got to be the geekiest and coolest surname I have seen for a while.

  • [–]

    Leigh Ridgway

    Monday, December 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM

    Australian soldiers serving in Afghanistan enjoy free telephone calls back to Australia. There is absolutely no reason for a soldier to expect to be paying through the nose for a basic service such as telephone and it is absolutely deplorable that a service provider is exploiting servicemen in this way.

    But that type of thing is sadly par for the course in the US military.

    • [–]

      Stefan

      Monday, December 20, 2010 at 9:02 PM

      Well this is the american army remember. I’m pretty sure their pay is nothing in compairison to ours. America’s tactics in term of soldier treatment are very different to ours.

  • [–]

    James Mac

    Monday, December 20, 2010 at 12:26 PM

    Are bases, and embassies, not considered home soil?

  • [–]

    Bob

    Monday, December 20, 2010 at 12:30 PM

    So, is he also going to have problems understanding the term “duck” in a firefight?

    • [–]

      Ozoneocean

      Monday, December 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM

      I think daffy quit the Taliban a while ago.

      • [–]

        James Mac

        Monday, December 20, 2010 at 4:23 PM

        It was the pants requirement.

  • [–]

    Steve

    Monday, December 20, 2010 at 2:59 PM

    I call bullshit. How can you not know the difference between a minute/month and still be in the military? How could he think a $5/month UNLIMITED plan to home was somehow plausible? More likely this guy KNEW what he was doing and when he was called out pulled the whole “me no speak English!” routine to try to weasel out of paying the bill.

    As for why the US military doesn’t provide calls to home: They do. The military provides Wi-Fi, calls, videochat, letters etc back home free of charge. This man consciously decided to open a private number to call home from Afghanistan, so he foots the bill.

Join The Discussion