
Facebook’s been trying to register the word “face” as a trademark for a while, but now the US Patent Office has finally decided to grant the social network’s application. Here are the details of what happened.
A short time ago, Facebook took over the trademark application for “Face” from a company who operated a site called Faceparty.com. This particular application was opposed by Aaron Greenspan—the fellow who took Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to court over the creation of Facebook—but now has been granted a Notice of Allowance by the USPTO anyway.
The Notice of Allowance means that as long as Facebook pays an issue fee to the USPTO within the next three months, it can enjoy a trademark on the word “face” when it comes to “[t] elecommunication services, namely, providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users in the field of general interest and concerning social and entertainment subject matter, none primarily featuring or relating to motoring or to cars”
This basically means that it would be very unwise for you to name your hot new social networking site FaceMeet, SlapToTheFace, or FaceNovel. You don’t have too much to fear when it comes to products or services outside of what the trademark covers.
It’s also worth noting that it isn’t particularly unusual for a company to hold trademarks on common words like this. Hell, Apple has “Chicago” trademarked—when talking about computer fonts. [TechCrunch]



















Matt
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:13 PMJust like Cadbury have trademarked ‘The Colour Purple’
I swear there was a book/movie about that haha.
Matt
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:14 PMAlthough, I wonder if this will affect Apple’s FaceTime…
Wok
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:23 PMTotal BS.
Errr FaceTime?
I am sick of stupid TM and Patents.
Molokov
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:27 PMWhy “none primarily featuring or relating to motoring or to cars”? Is the word ‘face’ connected to motoring website in a way I have no idea about?
Benjibuls
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:48 PMUm FaceTime anyone?
StevoTheDevo
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:48 PMHow can Apple get away with FaceTime then?
adz
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 3:05 PMFACE TIME?
lol fucking Apple. I HATE Apple
Steve
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 3:13 PMI think “Faceparty” is hilarious. What the hell is a face party? But these bizarre patent troll cases annoy me, does the consumer benefit at all from this sort of litigation?
Rahul Khanna
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 5:51 PMI was going to comment about FaceTime but now all I want in life is to go to a Face party.
lukian
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 5:43 PMI’m tempted to register things like “assface” now