Experts Worry Toddlers Are Becoming iPhone Addicts

For some toddlers today the venerable “toys of choice” are not dolls or blocks, but iPhones. Experts worry their development is hampered by this “screen time.” I’m inclined to argue every generation has its vices and parents need to parent.

Touchscreens and ultra-portable communication devices are the inevitable future, you see, and as long as little Susie isn’t staring into a screen for six hours at a time like a little pink zombie, what’s the harm in her becoming acclimated with the tools she’ll be immersed in when she’s older?

But lest you be distracted from the research by my unhinged ranting, here’s what’s happening with the toddler sect today, according to a series of interviews on toddlers and iPhone usage in the New York Times:

Natasha Sykes, a mother of two in Atlanta, remembers the first time her daughter, Kelsey, now 3 1/2 but then barely 2 years old, held her husband’s iPhone. “She pressed the button and it lit up. I just remember her eyes. It was like ‘Whoa!’” [...]Kelsey would ask for [the iPhone] . Then she’d cry for it. “It was like she’d always want the phone,” Ms. Sykes said. After a six-hour search one day, she and her husband found the iPhone tucked away under Kelsey’s bed. They laughed. But they also felt vague concern. Kelsey, and her 2-year-old brother, Chase, have blocks, Legos [sic] , bouncing balls, toy cars and books galore. (“They love books,” Ms. Sykes said.) But nothing compares to the iPhone. “If they know they have the option of the phone or toys, it will be the phone, ” Ms. Sykes said.

No kidding! Crazy thing: I’ve seen little kids do the exact same thing with ice cream. I’ve even seen parents deny their kid this ice cream. The kid totally survived not getting the ice cream! Wild!

Here’s the other thing. When I was growing up in the tumultuous 1980s, with its creature features and gyrating Alicia Silverstones on Music Television, I had this temptation called “TV,” and also these “VHS tapes” of movies that I’d tape off that TV. I’d watch them for hours on end before the tape literally wore out. During grade school I’d watch the grainiest Star Wars tape in existence every day after class until I literally had the dialogue memorised.

My parents obviously recognised that this wasn’t healthy. They enrolled me in a local soccer league and encouraged me to start playing an instrument (the violin). They sat down with the family every night for dinner and talked. Ultimately I survived the big bad television that was supposedly rotting my brain. Crazy!

If something like an iPhone is a complementary part of a young person’s life, in this day and age, that’s completely fine. It’s how life is, and will be, and is also a testament to how Apple was able to create and design a mini computer that’s betwixt adults and children alike. Hell, even the experts are starry-eyed. Isn’t that right, anti-iPhone psychology professor Kathy Hirsh Pasek?

Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, a psychology professor at Temple University who specialises in early language development, sides with the Don’ts. Research shows that children learn best through active engagement that helps them adapt, she said, and interacting with a screen doesn’t qualify. Still, Dr. Hirsh-Pasek, struck on a recent visit to New York City by how many parents were handing over their iPhones to their little children in the subway, said she understands the impulse. “This is a magical phone,” she said. “I must admit I’m addicted to this phone.” – NYT

I hope she wasn’t checking email on her iPhone while giving the NYT that interview. That would have been so passively engaging!

But enough. Giving into your grabby kid when they drool over a Retina Display is an impulse. One that can be resisted. If you’re a good parent.

It’s not the iPhone’s fault that your kid stares at a screen for six hours and doesn’t have the communication skills necessary to make friends. It’s yours. Do your job. [New York Times, Image: NYT]

Discuss

(7 Comments)
  • [–]

    Travis New

    Monday, October 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM

    @Jack

    Seriously bad parents always want a scape goat and psychologist are always willing to charge to the hour what the scape goat is.

    I admit I was spoiled. I received nearly every gen console release since I was 6(DOB 1987) but you know what else I did 3 after school sports Rugy, Gymnastics & Kendo and I also received B+ average grade sometimes a “A”.

    A child doesn’t know there are other things to do(Sports,Karate,Music) if you don’t tell them. Children are and children and as such need direction. If your direction is to your phone every time your kid whinges then thats YOUR FAULT! Not Apple. Not your kids. YOURS THE PARENT!

  • [–]

    matt

    Monday, October 18, 2010 at 12:49 PM

    what a joke.

    “Please … just say no. It is not too hard to distract a toddler with, say … a book.”

    how is the iphone any worse than a book? what is she doing on the iphone? care to mention that? maybe… READING?

    typical technology witch hunt.

    and if there isn’t enough ‘active engagement’ on the iphone, thats only cause there isn’t an app for that, YET!

    its just a medium… like paper… its what SHE’S ACTUALLY DOING that matters. having said that, the ios devices are typically for consumers, all the apps… generally not very constructive… but there is no reason they can’t be.

  • [–]

    matt h

    Monday, October 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM

    Yep yep yep.. Today iPhones (tomorrow stereoscopic 3d for ultraviolent first person shooters – mark my words), yesterday the internet, before that consoles, before that “video nasties”, before that metal music, before that rock and roll, before that comics, before that cartoons and on and on ad infinitum. Never mind that the people protesting always came from the generation before where these things were supposedly worse and managed to not become axe murderers. Yes, some people can watch the box and come away enlightened and enriched. Others become couch potatoes.

    Amen to all you guys. PARENTING.

  • [–]

    chris

    Monday, October 18, 2010 at 8:38 PM

    On the flipside… I’m a teacher and I’ve given my 3 year old access to my iphone for about 30 mins a day since she was little, and made sure there’s been lots of educational apps on it. She’s now 100% at recognising all the numbers and letters of the alphabet, and is insanely good with colours. There are sooo many really great educational apps. BUT, I do agree, too much time is not good, there have to be strict limits, and there is no substitute for active play with real physical objects, reading books, colouring, drawing, running around etc… I don’t have a problem with some restricted access time, so long as it’s well used time.

  • [–]

    olearymo

    Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM

    so apparently this wouldn’t happen with any other kind of smartphone. So, get an android, palm pre, windows phone, etc. problem solved, right?

  • [–]

    Kt

    Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 4:24 PM

    This is stupid. At that age, they shouldn’t let toddlers have anything like that. DSs maybe, but iPhones? It makes me sick.

  • [–]

    Cy Starkman

    Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 5:56 PM

    Jack you are right, but you obviously fail on certain areas of comprehension.

    Can a 6 month old navigate
    - a VHS
    - a TV
    - a computer
    - a console

    The answer is no, the interfaces are too abstract and there are too many steps involved that will stump them. Buttons, pop ups, inserting of objects the right way…

    Can a 6 month old navigate an iPhone?
    - Yes
    - Swipe to unlock, obvious
    - The device reacts directly to your actions, no abstraction
    - The pretty flower shows pictures of your family
    - Each icon becomes quickly understood

    - A dog and a cat have been filmed beating air hockey on iPad

    The point is that iOS is a new development in human/computer interface. It doesn’t require an array of knowledges, it’s fast.

    And then you see said child trying to use the laptop as a touch screen…

    So yes, the child is going to become highly skilled quickly with very engaging results for them.

    And yes, it is the parent who has the power to restrict access.

    Which is mostly a joke given parents start stuffing chocolate down their kids by 3months and use the TV from birth all day long as a nanny. The iPhone? The majority will be wanting their child on it 6 hours a day, if it was any different it would already be different and it’s not.

    Soapboxes aside, let’s just deal with the reality of society and more interestingly ponder the side effects, both positive and negative of the iPhone generation.

Join The Discussion