NASA Could Launch Scramjets From Massive Railguns

With the Space Shuttle program winding down, NASA and several commercial ventures are developing technology that will hurl the next iteration of space vehicles into the sky. But NASA acknowledges that rockets aren’t the only – or the best – way to get into space.

Engineers at the space agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida are exploring future space launch schemes that could see spacecraft flung into the heavens by a massive railgun or launched to the upper atmosphere aboard supersonic scramjets. Or even cooler: both.

If space launches are anything, they’re expensive. As such, launch vehicles that are reusable (like the space shuttles) are key to keeping costs under control. One such scheme for reusable launch craft involves ferrying payloads to the upper limits of the atmosphere aboard scramjets, those air-compressing, high-speed jets with theoretical top speeds more than four times faster than the fastest air-breathing jet engines.

In such a scheme, a payload vehicle (holding, say, a satellite) would piggyback to high altitude aboard the scramjet, which in theory could reach near-orbital speeds. From the upper atmosphere, the payload vehicle would launch from the scramjet propelled by something akin to the second stage of a booster rocket, putting the satellite or even a manned vehicle into orbital space without the incredible thrust needed to launch it from the ground.

But how does NASA plan to get the scramjet to the supersonic speeds necessary for sustained flight? Picture a huge railgun rising from the ground at Kennedy Space Center. Using an electrified track stretching for miles, the track would use a magnetic field (or perhaps gas propulsion or even magnetic levitation – this stuff is all still very much on the drawing board) to accelerate scramjets to otherworldly speeds without expending the huge amounts of chemical energy needed to fire a rocket booster. Once a scramjet is moving fast enough, the jet engine would take over and propel it spaceward.

For now, rockets are still NASA’s principle launch vehicles, so don’t expect any spacecraft-hurling railguns or regular hypersonic flights to the edge of space in the immediate future. But these technologies already exist in some nascent form or another. Both NASA and DARPA have been dabbling in scramjet technology for years, creating a vast body of knowledge and data for engineers to build upon. For their part, railguns have been around for nearly a century. All the technologies involved need further refinement, but none are out of reach.

Put another way: NASA is dreaming up massive railguns to launch hypersonic space vehicles into the atmosphere at blinding speeds. What’s not to like?

[NASA via Space.com]

Popular Science is your wormhole to the future. Reporting on what’s new and what’s next in science and technology, we deliver the future now.

Discuss

(10 Comments)
  • [–]

    Shane

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM

    Can I get one for my community to work!?!?

    Sounds awesome!!

  • [–]

    Corteks

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 2:33 PM

    I remember seeing this in sci-fi shows and games in the past and wondering why it wasn’t being used already. Railguns have been around for a while and this would be a perfect, practical use for the tech.

    • [–]

      Bern

      Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM

      There are several reasons it hasn’t been used already. The first is that supersonic flight at sea level (or close to it) is hard – drag is very high, and so is dynamic pressure. Most rockets take off vertically so they can get out of the thick air close to the ground as soon as possible, to minimise drag before they turn and start accelerating to orbital speed.

      The second problem is that air-breathing propulsion systems capable of flying at anything close to orbital speed (that’s about Mach 20 or so) are only a very recent invention – it’s still only 8 years since the very first experimental test flight of a scramjet (at Woomera, by the University of Queensland team).

      • [–]

        Christopher

        Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 4:57 PM

        8 years since the first experimental one and I think 6 years since UQ produced the world’s first successful scramjet. I sat in on a friend’s lecture about them earlier this semester. Best one hour break at uni ever.

  • [–]

    Matt

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 2:34 PM

    Sounds very battlestar galactica….

  • [–]

    Steve

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM

    what
    ?!!?!?!

    have none of you heard of technoman? or tekkaman i think the japanese call it.

  • [–]

    Tboner

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 4:18 PM

    like the one sonic has in the first movie , he has his plane attached to it lol

  • [–]

    B

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 at 7:45 PM

    Don’t rail-guns suffer from electrolysis (or something)? I remember reading that at the end of the run the piece moving along the rails becomes welded to it…maybe they have found a solution to this problem.

  • [–]

    TENINDO

    Friday, September 17, 2010 at 12:44 AM

    Hmmmm I wonder how long the rail gun would need to be to accelerate the craft at g-forces not life threatening? and I wonder how they would account for the craft hitting birds at such high speed at initially low altitudes? Sounds like it might happen someday – I reckon about 50 to 100 years from now.

    • [–]

      TENINDO

      Friday, September 17, 2010 at 12:49 AM

      Actually I see they don’t talk about manned scram jets so the rail gun wouldn’t need to be so long. Still I just don’t see how they would account for the high speeds at low altitude – Unless the gun was angled upwards and started underground?

Join The Discussion