
According to modified general relativity equations, our universe may be inside a black hole, the black holes in our universe may contain other universes, and the black holes in those universes may contain other universes… I need a drink.
If Indiana University cosmologist Nikodem Poplawski analysis is right, we may be living inside a black hole. His observations on the motion of particles entering black holes suggest that black holes may not be singularities, like Eintein’s general relativity theory states, but bridges to different universes:
Maybe the huge black holes at the centre of the Milky Way and other galaxies are bridges to different universes.
According to Poplawski, instead of matter reaching infinite density while going through a black hole, the particles rebound and expand again. This phenomenon, which is based in the Einstein-Cartan-Kibble-Sciama theory of gravity, would explain many of the observations that have puzzled physicists for year and give an explanation to the direction of space-time in our universe. [Science Direct via New Scientist]



















MrTaco
Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 9:02 AMPfft, my cousin totally had this theory years ago. I remember him telling me about it when we were little kids :P
Ha
Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 11:51 AMSame here, I wasn’t wearing any pants at the time.
dar
Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 11:32 AMform which comic this illustration is from ?I t cannot remember the name.
thanks
Flux
Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 11:45 AMIt’s not a comic, it’s the old Disney movie “The Black Hole”…
Flux
Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 11:48 AMTo slightly paraphrase the late, great Richard Feynman: “Anyone who says they understand relativity, doesn’t understand relativity.”
matt
Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 5:56 PMoh god.. so blackholes… which is it? wormhole to another universe? or certain death? I need to know before I plan my next Holiday!
Bill Williams
Thursday, November 18, 2010 at 9:46 PMI forgot who it was that said: “Opinions are like blackholes – everyone’s got one.”
To that I might add: “…esoteric math or no esoteric math.”
ike
Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 12:54 PMThis comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted