Nanobots Are Taking Over In This Month’s T3 Magazine

Gizmodo AU

You’re standing on the beach at Penzance, staring out across the new cross-atlantic bridge: it’s the latest and greatest feat of engineering, wrought from cutting-edge, lab-grown super-carbon steel “woven” by a tireless workforce of self-repairing nanobots…

Okay, obviously this isn’t real, and nor is it likely to happen in the next few years. But it still could. Someday.

Back in 2003, Prince Charles was hailing nanotech, while also fretting that it might herald a disaster as terrible as Thalidomide. Michael “Jurassic Park” Crichton penned a novel on the subject and scientists suggested that engineering “robots” no bigger than the head of a pin would revolutionise the human race. Then… nothing.

Nanotechnology was over-hyped when it first entered the public consciousness, and its risks were more talked about than its potential benefits. But while public attention has waned, real progress has been made, driven by substantial corporate and governmental investment. The result is that nano-engineered products are now part of everyday life, whether you are aware of them or not.

In this issue of T3 we investigate nanotechnology, how far we have come and what to expect in the future. It’s not all about nanotechnology though. The future of technology is covered off in detail in a special 12 page feature. There is also one of the biggest iPhone 4 previews around, a solid five pages written by the combined forces of our Australia, US and UK editorial teams.

T3 also went to the United States to speak with the FBI about cybercrime and take in E3, all of which is covered in the issue. Plus, there’s the usual detailed reviews, comparisons, buyers guides and news.

The August issue is available now through Woolworths, Coles Express, 7-11, Borders and all good newsagents. Look out for the metallic gold cover.

Discuss

(14 Comments)
  • [–]

    attila

    Friday, July 23, 2010 at 12:20 PM

    What is that thing in her hand supposed to be?

    • [–]

      Red T-Rex

      Friday, July 23, 2010 at 12:48 PM

      It’s a thigh….oh, you mean the other hand!

      Notice the “*Female not to scale” print. I guess they mean the iPhone is to scale then.

      • [–]

        attila

        Friday, July 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM

        aaah my bad – I missed the joke on that one.

  • [–]

    Greg

    Friday, July 23, 2010 at 2:02 PM

    Congrats on the front page grammatical error T3!

    “WIN AN HTC DESIRE”? surely it should be “WIN A HTC DESIRE”

    • [–]

      Jester

      Friday, July 23, 2010 at 3:03 PM

      Greg, may I be the first to congratulate you on your FAIL. Go and sit your English exam again.

      • [–]

        Simon Reidy

        Friday, July 23, 2010 at 3:23 PM

        LOL. I guess it all depends on how you read out “HTC”, but in written format I’m afraid Jester is quite right.

        Go sit in the corner with your fail hat please Greg.

    • [–]

      Andrew R

      Friday, July 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM

      Because HTC is an acronym not a word, it is read by its letters “Aitch” “Tee” “Cee”. Unless you grew up being taught that H was pronounced “Haitch” as many Australians were / are. In that case you are likely to place ‘a’ rather than ‘an’ in front. If Wikipedia’s stats are anything close to correct then there are a lot of Australians saying “Haitch”.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H#Name_in_English

      • [–]

        Simon Reidy

        Friday, July 23, 2010 at 3:50 PM

        I meant if you read out HTC as “High Tech Computer Corporation” as that would be the only way an “a” instead of an “an” would be acceptable in that sentence :)

      • [–]

        Simon Reidy

        Friday, July 23, 2010 at 3:51 PM

        btw people that say “haitch” make me want to punch them in the eye.

      • [–]

        Damian Francis

        Friday, July 23, 2010 at 4:02 PM

        @Andrew, @Jester and @Simon: I was all ready to fire off a reply, but you champs did the work for me. So thank you.

        Greg, I would like to join Jester in congratulating you on your fail but also on having the balls to question what you thought may be wrong.

  • [–]

    canberracubicle

    Friday, July 23, 2010 at 3:36 PM

    um, what does she have to do with the contents of the magazine?

    • [–]

      mrinformative

      Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 2:50 AM

      can’t you tell ? she’s wearing nanopants

  • [–]

    Greg

    Friday, July 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM

    Ok, ok….i was wrong…lol

    I suppose I’ll blame my English teacher not teaching me that you decide on AN or A based on the spelling or pronunciation of an acronym, not on the fact that it’s first letter is a consonant or vowel.

    And, for the record, I say ‘aitch’…

  • [–]

    Andrew

    Friday, July 23, 2010 at 7:21 PM

    I really like women, always have, but as a 40 year old male who likes gadgets I find it quite embarrassing to buy the T3/Stuff magazines with their stupid “girly” front covers. If I want to look at girls I’ll buy porn, but I want to read about gadgets so I can’t understand why these publication insist on using these models. Who are they marketing to, 14 year old prepubescent males? Gizmodo seems to manage quite well without the softcore porn.

Join The Discussion