You only have to pay for the shipping. This kind of silicon case could also help with the glass shattering. Note: Gizmodo or Gawker Media don’t endorse or have any relationship with this company. [Cases]
You only have to pay for the shipping. This kind of silicon case could also help with the glass shattering. Note: Gizmodo or Gawker Media don’t endorse or have any relationship with this company. [Cases]
Nick Johnson
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 10:24 AMShipping this to Australia? Over $20 :/ not so free.
FFS
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 1:20 PMWhich part of “You only have to pay for the shipping” did you not understand?
Leo W'ski
Thursday, July 8, 2010 at 10:09 AM…uhm that $20+ for shipping is $$ more then the case is worth when you can get other cases for almost nix if you check around.
Razza
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 2:07 PMI worked it out for postcode 3000 VIC, Australia.
2 for $22.68
3 for $22.68
5 for $22.68
7 for $24.52
8 for $24.52
10 for $24.52
11 for $28.11
huu
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 2:13 PMI just dont get it, why hide such a beautiful thing like this inside an ugly piece of silicon. I understand some phone do look better in 3rd party cases/skins but the iPhone4 come on!
Simon Reidy
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 2:28 PMBecause as has been headline news for weeks (and is even mentioned in bold in this very story) the iPhone has serious reception problems when held a certain way. A case solves this problem.
Stefan
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 5:15 PMgawd wanna suck up to apple some more XD
marztar
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 at 10:36 PMlol u just hate apple man… i bet you kick a persons trolley at coles if they got apples in their mix!
Sam Timmins
Thursday, July 8, 2010 at 12:53 AM*Busy laughing at the massive FAIL Jobs has brought onto himself*