Massive Afghanistan Lithium Deposit (As In Batteries) Could Alter US Economy

A large mineral deposit worth an estimated $US1 trillion has been discovered in Afghanistan, Pentagon officials revealed today. The find could change the US economy, alter the war and contains vast amounts of lithium – found in many of today’s batteries.

Better still, beyond batteries – rather unimportant when your country is war-torn Afghanistan – are the numerous jobs that this find could create as it forms what could – stress could – be one of the world’s largest mining operations.

An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and Blackberries.

The vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was discovered by a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists. The Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai were recently briefed, American officials said.

While it could take many years to develop a mining industry, the potential is so great that officials and executives in the industry believe it could attract heavy investment even before mines are profitable, providing the possibility of jobs that could distract from generations of war. - The New York Times

Huh. So how about that. From the arid nothingness of the Afghan countryside comes one of the most important mineral finds in recent memory.

Some restraint is necessary here, and US/Afghanistan officials are mindful of how factions like the Taliban might see the deposit as a power play. China also looms large, and US officials, according to the New York Times, are wary that that nation might try and influence or even control the potentially massive mineral trade.

Oh and there’s little to no major manufacturing facilities in Afghanistan, which will make processing the lithium, iron, copper, cobalt and gold incredibly difficult. Um, and many of the minerals are also in areas of the country where fighting has been the most intense, like the south and east.

Still good news is hard to find in Afghanistan these days, so I, for one, will attempt to remain that the plethora of “ifs” that surround this bizarre breaking news will resolve positively. Is there really a choice? [New York Times Image: NYT]

Discuss

(10 Comments)
  • [–]

    Richard Siu

    Monday, June 14, 2010 at 9:08 PM

    How convenient is all I have to say…

    As if the Americans didn’t know about this when they first invaded… I find it highly skeptical that they stumbled upon this like it was a big surprise…

  • [–]

    Chris Rigg

    Monday, June 14, 2010 at 9:26 PM

    I wondered why Afghanistan was the preferred playing field The US and USSR, it all makes sense now.

  • [–]

    Chris Rigg

    Monday, June 14, 2010 at 9:29 PM

    There could be a case of assault and battery?

  • [–]

    DMZFreak

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 12:18 AM

    I hate to say it but this is probably released by the pentagon because they think it is probably part of the wikileaks collection of top secret cables. By releasing it now they think that it can diminish the potential damage of the cables – like you know – we were going to tell everyone anyway – we were just double checking the data.

    PS. the other main source is Boliva – land locked country in the mountains. go figure the odds

  • [–]

    Jack

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 12:49 AM

    huh..well id be keeping a close eye on the USA in terms of how they will try to aquire thhis resource. Afterall they are in debt to china for 1 trillion dollars.

  • [–]

    martin

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM

    “The find could change the US economy” What? Didn’t they find lithium in Afghanistan, not Arkansas? Surely this should benefit the Afghani people, not the USA. Go find resources in your own country USA, stop friggin stealing other peoples.

    • [–]

      boc

      Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 2:30 PM

      It’d be nice if the Afghan nation benefited from this discovery.

      Unfortunately the riches will go to the people that win the mining contracts.

      Guess which country they’ll all likely be from?

  • [–]

    Andrew Craick

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 9:41 AM

    Going to be cynical like other people but no surpise here. Maybe America didn’t invade Iraq or Afghanistan for terrorism or WMD’s. Perhaps W just used that as an excuse to secure America’s policical, financial and resource interests in the region.

    In other news ……. ‘Iraq discovered to contain millions of barrels of oil after US invasion’

  • [–]

    Fred

    Wednesday, July 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM

    I’d be careful. Taking out the batteries of the planet could mean that CONSEQUENCES WILL NEVER BE THE SAME.

  • [–]

    tboyle

    Wednesday, January 5, 2011 at 4:30 PM

    you would think with all that lithium in afghanistan , everyones mood would be better… calmer ?

Join The Discussion