Look at this magazine cover. It’s Madonna. Madonna showing her breasts. Without nipples. Why? Because of Apple’s silent censorship, that’s why. We said it already: It’s time to declare war against Apple’s censorship. Steve, you are going the wrong way.
In case you are not aware of it, here’s what happened: British fashion magazine Dazed & Confused has made an iPad version of their magazine. Internally, they call it the “Iran Edition” because they have to censor any nudity, no matter how innocent it is. This is not the first time that this happens, but this is even worse, because nudity in a fashion magazine is actually editorial content: There are plenty of designers who use transparent fabrics or risque cleavages. Not to mention lingerie.
Seriously, you can’t keep doing this. You just can’t. It’s only going to explode in your face. Like all the dumb app-approval moves Apple has made in the last few months. Steve: Don’t you remember the last time you tried to have full control over everything and everyone? Yes? It ended badly for you – ousted from your own company – with Apple about to die, and with Microsoft ruling the world.
See, I have been using my iPad for more than a month now. And my iPhone for almost three years. And after all this time, I still think you have the chance to redefine computers once again. In fact, I think you have set that metamorphosis in motion already. But the iPad or Apple won’t be in that certain computing future if you guys keep doing this.
You just can’t dictate policies that lead to the arbitrary censorship of certain applications. For political sentiments, for foul language, for showing nipples. Why do this? You have an age control system built into all your devices. Use it and let people decide on their own. Don’t try to be my father or my mother. Instead, enable people to communicate with your devices. Make that policy clear to everyone. No holds. No barriers.
I know what you are going to say. Apple is your company. Yes, it is and you can do whatever the hell you want with it. But this is just not cool. This sucks. This is not you. Apple was never a fake corporation like Disney or a cold behemoth like IBM. You used to give IBM the finger, remember? And remember when you used to smoke joints while having days at the beach, enjoying the California sun and tofu burgers with the Macintosh team? Or the pirate flag at Bandley 3?
You used to be the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the square pegs in the round holes, the ones who were never fond of the rules. Remember?
People liked you because of that. And now, this is what you have become:
Jon Stewart recently pointed this out. And Bild Digital’s CEO Donata Hopfen said that “today [Apple]censor nipples, tomorrow editorial content”. Her prophecy became reality. So please, listen before it’s too late. It’s time to return that nipple to Madonna, and lift any kind of censorship from the app store. [Shiny Shiny via Vallewag]



















Travis
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 9:10 AM@flyairmark
They’re not censoring the internet they’re censoring their applications/programs. Slight difference.
Shane
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 9:18 AMThen the question is the, how long before they decide they need to censor the internet.
If people can complain that certain apps are offensive, how long before some one complains that something that safari loaded is offensive??
At some point, the consumer needs to be held responsible.
Vikeyev
Thursday, November 4, 2010 at 9:43 PMWTF are you crying about, come live in australia, the government wants to introduce a MANDATORY, ISP level internet filter, to stop people from watching porn and other stuff like that.
They use the guise “it’s to protect the children” although studies have already shown nearly 80% of the country already knows how to bypass the filter even though it hasn’t been implemented.
This draconian style censorship will slow our internet down by 75%, which sucks even more because they are using 44BILLION tax payer dollars to install fibre optic cables round the country. So not only are they trying to censor us, they are wasting our money, because even with the fibre optic the filter will make australian internet slower then it is now.
Not only that, one ISP showed them 5 ways to bypass the filter in 5 minutes, just to show them it was completely useless.
Be happy your government isn’t a bunch of super nanny Nazi cunts.
matt
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 9:18 AMexactly
Grant Burton
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 9:48 AMMaybe Apple needs to set up shop in Australia, as our government wants to filter and censor everything on the internet like China!
Surlysimon
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 11:28 AMShane
The difference is the internet isn’t an Apple product and as such they aren’t liable for what people look at. Apple are acting in exactly the same fashion as most every other media company in the States, look at the fuss over that nipple expose during the superbowl last year. Apple operates in a deeply conservative country and I think this just reflects the reality of being a media company in the US. Interestingly the internet is somewhat protected by the US constitution, if Apple or anyone else tried to censor it they would face legal opposition based on the first amendment.
boc
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 1:51 PMConservative country? That’s a non-argument considering that the USA is one of the biggest producers and consumers of adult content.
This is just idiotic censorship because Apple is to lazy to implement a proper content rating system across the Apple brand.
whatiris
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 12:31 PMNo, they’re not just censoring their applications. They are censoring *content*. They are censoring which books are available through iBooks. They are censoring which books are available through the Kindle app. They’re censoring which magazines are available through magazine reading apps.
It’s one thing to censor actual applications, but Apple has firmly moved into the business of censoring books and magazines as well. It’s really, really troubling!
ConceptCheck
Friday, July 2, 2010 at 12:58 AMwhatiris: Your fears and worries around feeling so troubled about censorship are very appropriate – for *real censorship*. If the government were banning content, burning books, and outlawing media from speaking on topics, then indeed, your worries are valid.
But selecting the works that are available through a retail sales channel isn’t censorship.
If you opened a bookstore and coffee shop, you would choose the books that you put on your sale shelves. You would choose them based on what you believed would be best for your business, and based on what would shape the mood and experience you wanted for people shopping.
I think people are mixing up the technical possibility of being able to offer every book and all content with the retail sales reality – well supported in US law – of selecting and selling only the stock and inventory you desire to sell.
If you want the other content, just shop somewhere else. Vote with your dollars. But calm down – Steve Jobs isn’t taking down our democracy by choosing not to sell certain books and magazines in his store.
Pinball
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 12:45 PMI have nothing against nudity, but how is this any different to radio stations who beep out swear words in songs? It isn’t. Apple for whatever reason have decided they don’t want to sell potentially offensive products (or at a minimum censor those products) as they have every right to. If you don’t like it you don’t have to buy your stuff through Apple. Pretty easy.
If in some fantasy land where buying things through iTunes was the only option, then censoring what they sell would be wrong. It is however a fact we live in a competitive marketplace, if you don’t like something from someone don’t buy it! Use a competitor.
Bernie
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 6:14 PMI agree with Pinball; if you don’t like it, then buy a different product, easy.
As a parent, I bought my son an iPod Touch (just like many parents have), and I whole heartedly agree with Apples approach. It wouldn’t be that easy to implement parental control on an iPod as it doesn’t have user level control.
Again, I say …. If you don’t like it, tough. Buy something you like instead of whining about something you don’t; you’re not helping anyone.
grunmble
Friday, May 14, 2010 at 2:57 PMActually Bernie, it would be very easy to add parental control to iPods as the iPod needs to connect to iTunes to add media. An iPod could trigger a parental mode on iTunes. Furthermore each iPod could have different parental settings if they were defined in the initial setup and possibly password protected.
There is no need for blanket censorship when the technology for individual, parental-set censorship is available.
I understand that parents are protective of their children but please do not hold such confident and strong opinions if you don’t understand programming or the capabilities of technology. Parental censorship should be very easy to enforce in technology, and it shouldn’t compromise the freedom of information available to adults.