Brought to you by

The iPad Will Be Your Next TV

For all we’ve written and read about the iPad, there’s one thing we don’t know for sure: How people will use it. Apple and co seem to think it’s going to be your new TV – here’s why they’re right.

The Old Way: iTunes
Apple’s been implicitly pitching every device with a screen as a TV replacement since the iPod video came out, and they weren’t even ahead of the curve – young people have been comfortable ploughing through TV seasons, feature films and practically any other video content on computer screens for most of the last decade. It was this comfort with watching TV on something that’s not a TV that Apple exploited with iTunes TV downloads, which have, since launch, gone from a “who pays for online video?” marginal service to a thing that people – even tech-savvy ones – actually use.

I’d say that the iPad is second to Apple TV as Cupertino’s flagship video watching device, but I’m not even sure that’s true: In a lot of ways, the iPad is the next Apple TV. Purchasing and watching iTunes TV shows on your laptop isn’t exactly complicated, but the tap-tap-watch ease with which the iPad sells you a show then disappears into it will be intoxicating for a lot of people.

The New Way: The Web and Apps

When the iPad ships, you’ll be able to download an ABC app, and stream the same content they offer on their website – including full episodes of Lost, for example – for free on your iPad. Soon, CBS will have revamped their website to stream video straight to the Flash-less iPad, using the device’s support for the HTML5 video tag. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

If you have a Netflix account, you’ll be able to download a free Netflix app, and stream thousands of films and TV shows. A Hulu app is on the way. Network streaming apps like Air Video will let you watch your torrented/camcordered/archived collection, stream straight from your computer. Video sites like Funny or Die have already started shifting to iPad-compatible streaming formats.

Why It’ll Work
There’s a rightful stigma about watching TV on a computer, because, well, it’s a computer. It’s a multi-tasking machine that you use every day – and in some cases, all day – to work, browse, communicate and create things. Video plays fine on a computer and doesn’t play any better on an iPad. But to a user, a computer is a computer, a TV is a TV: one sits on your desk or gets warm on your lap and asks things of you; the other sits passively showing you what you want to see, and nothing else.

The iPad falls somewhere in the middle. When you watch a video on the iPad, the device cases to exist. There’s no keyboard, no touchpad, no wrist rest, leaving just a floating block of video – sort of like your TV. It’s a consumption device.

And then there are the ways people will use it. It feels strange to take your laptop to the toilet, but people don’t think twice about taking on their smartphone to the throne. The iPad falls closer to the smartphone in the situation. Watching in bed, in the back of a car, on a bus – these are all thing that laptops and iPhones already allow, but that the iPad, with its slim profile, 10-hour video-playing battery life, stubborn monofocus, and larger (as compared the the iPhone) screen, could make truly appealing.

Early reviewers have been prone to call the iPad an evolution of the laptop. It’s not. It’s a featureless window to content. In other words, it’s your next TV.

Discuss

(5 Comments)
  • [–]

    Nicholas

    Saturday, April 3, 2010 at 1:18 PM

    but it’s too small…

  • [–]

    Steve Thomas

    Saturday, April 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM

    Not really. My next TV is going to be a 42″ LCD that hangs on the wall. And I’ll do what I do now — surf the web on my laptop while some crap shows on the TV. :)

  • [–]

    robert

    Sunday, April 4, 2010 at 11:07 PM

    That’s an interesting one — it’s the next Apple TV. Really? Not the next big thing?

    I think the #1 problem with it is going to be the fact that you have to hold it in your hand (more or less). And if you dock it or whatever, why not just go with a laptop? Pick it up every time, to get fingerprints on it, just to type something? I dunno.

    The freedom it offers over a laptop, in a sense, comes with the burden of having to hold it in your hand. This might, in fact, make it the next Apple TV. Even lighter weights get heavy when you have to hold them for a while. Carry a dock or a stand wherever you go?

    I’d rather have a laptop, but alas, that’s not perfect either. Swap out a 12 cell battery or two and you’re working overtime and then some.

    I wouldn’t be so pessimistic to suggest that this will be the next Apple TV, but I do think it’s a little overhyped. There’s only so much adjusting folks are going to do (and they’ll do a lot). If you’ve got folks redesigning websites and creating applications specifically for this device, that just goes to show you. I’d love to see such luxuries for Linux — now THAT could be the next big thing. Photoshop on Linux? Yikes. How cool would that be?

    This could turn out well, you know, but in a sense, maybe it being the next Apple TV isn’t that far off.

  • [–]

    klaw

    Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM

    Wow, so you can like watch TV shows and movies and stuff?

    You mean, just like you’ve been able to do on laptops, netbooks and desktops for several years? These devices are media consumption devices too, and quite frankly they’re pretty damn good at it. And most people already have one, without needing to buy a specil device and download an app for each source of media.

    There’s no real distinction between a computer “user” and a computer “consumer” – any perceived distinction is only perception and not a reality.

    I have no qualms about using a laptop on the throne, on a bus or in bed….I’ve been doing it for years. I can also use that same laptop to play games (real ones) and do actual work without compromises. If I want some quick browsing or a short game when I’m out, I still have a phone for that.

  • [–]

    Gary

    Saturday, July 10, 2010 at 10:09 PM

    Apple just has to put a tuner and PVR software into Apple TV, and then support streaming to the iPad and they’d have the PVR and small TV markets sewn up. I’m not sure they will as they seem to want to please the content providers and/or monetize content, but I’m guessing this will happen via Apple or Android sometime soon.

Join The Discussion