
Price
$US180 MSRP.
Models
As you’d notice if you were a router nerd, Linksys has ditched all of the old model numbers – but the same basic stratification comes into play. E3000 is the top of a pile of new routers, replacing the WRT610N. Going down the line, you’ve got two lesser E series routers that both run $US120: the E2100L, which runs Linux out of the box for tweakage, and it has the UPnP server too. The E2000 has selectable dual-band support and gigabit ethernet. Then there’s the $US80 E1000, which is the new “cheap” option for wireless N.
Verdict
It’s got new software that replaces the old and busted Linksys EasyLink Advisor, making it easier to setup. In fact, it shares it with Cisco’s new Valet router for that’s expressly designed to be eeeeeasy to use. In a nutshell, it sets the router up for you, complete with a non-”please hack me and steal my internet” SSID that’s secured, and lets you easily manage basics like guest access. That’s a good thing.

Once you do figure it out how to set up access, it works pretty well. You can add and remove files using computer’s own file browser as a networked drive, and I was able to stream music to my 360 without a hitch by merely selecting the drive as an A/V source. Video, on the other hand, never worked – for some reason my Xbox never saw them, despite seeing the server clearly. And where’s the iTunes server, BTW? D-Link’s laws-of-nature-defying photo frame-cum-router has one.

As for range, typically, we’ve tested routers at Brian or Jason’s houses in California, where there’s lots of space, and little urban wireless interference. Instead, I put the E3000 (and it’s family-friend cousin the Valet) to perhaps more brutal range tests: How well they handle the interference from a massive flustercuck of wireless networks inside a NY high rise. We’re talking 30 other wireless networks at any given test point. Using iStumbler, I couldn’t pick up either router more than two floors above or below my apartment, 15m (horizontally) away, but at the worst point for both routers, the E3000′s 2.4 GHz band managed about a 10 per cent stronger signal than the Valet and my WRT600N.

And that’s what it pretty much comes down to: If you need simultaneous dual band, and don’t want a Time Capsule, this is probably your router.

New software makes it easier to setup

A lot of router goodness for the money, with UPnP finally

Missing iTunes server, and other perks like BitTorrent downloaders

The storage interface sucks, and makes the UPnP feature less awesome than it could be
[Cisco]


















Jayt
Monday, April 12, 2010 at 10:50 PMThanks for the good review on the new Cisco E3000 however… I’d like to see a side by side of the wrt610 vrs the e3000 to see if there are any major improvements and any compelling reason to move to this new device.
BL117
Friday, April 16, 2010 at 4:22 AMThe wrt610n v2 and e3000 are identical hardware wise. the only difference is the firmware.
Nat
Saturday, October 16, 2010 at 8:31 PMWill the E3000 be IPV6 capable?
robert
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 10:33 PMIt seems it’s indeed more thant IPv6 capable : Seen on
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/IPv6-Smartphones-compromise-users-privacy-1169708.html
it says it is natively working as an IPv6 router and performs translation to IPv4 as needed.