
Now that we’ve seen the iPad in the light of day, there’s a lot of chatter about what it can’t do. But Apple is now a massive threat to netbooks and ebook readers. Here’s why:
Generally speaking, the iPad’s goal is not to replace your netbook, assuming you own and love one. It’s not about replacing your Kindle either, assuming you cashed in for that as well. We have reviewed plenty of both, and know there’s plenty to like. If you derive pleasure out of using either, then Apple might have a hard time convincing you to switch to the iPad. But for the millions of people who aren’t on either bandwagon, yet have the money and interest in a “third” device between the phone and the computer, the iPad will have greater appeal.
250 Million iPods Earlier…
When the first iPod came out, its goal was not to grab the customers who Creative and Archos were fighting over, with their duelling 6GB “jukeboxes”. It was to grab everyone else. I remember listening to arguments about why Archos had a better device than Creative or even Apple. Lot of good that early-adopter love got them in the long run. The pocket media player market exploded, with Apple eating over half the pie consistently for almost a decade.
When the iPhone came out, BlackBerry users were like, “No flippin’ way.” And guess what, those people still buy BlackBerries. (And why shouldn’t they? Today’s BlackBerry is still great, and hardly distinguishable from the BB of 2007.) The point is, the iPhone wasn’t designed to win the hearts and minds of people who already knew their way around a smartphone. It came to convince people walking around with Samsung and LG flip phones that there was more to life. And it worked.
iPhones now account for more than half of AT&T’s phone sales. You can bet that WinMo, Palm and BB combined weren’t doing that kind of share pre-iPhone. Globally, the smartphone business grew from a niche thing for people in suits to being a 180-million unit per year business, says Gartner, eclipsing the entire notebook business – about 20% of which, I might add, are netbooks. The iPhone isn’t the sole driver of this growth, of course, but its popularity has opened many new doors for the category. Just ask anyone in the business of developing/marketing/selling Droids or Palm Pres.

You could say, “Those were Apple’s successes, what about their failures?” In the second age of Steve Jobs, there aren’t a whole lot. Apple TV is the standout – quite possibly because Apple discovered, after releasing the product, that there wasn’t a big enough market for it, or any of its competitors. Apple TV may be crowded out by connected Blu-ray players, home-theatre PCs and HD video players, but Apple TV’s niche is, to this day, almost frustratingly unique.
So how do you know if a market exists? You ask the “other” Steve, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer.
It’s Business Time
There’s a famous Ballmerism, one he’s even said to me, that goes something like, “A business isn’t worth entering unless the sales potential is 50 million units or more.” Fifty million. That’s why Ballmer is happy to go into the portable media player business and the game console business, but laughs about ebook readers. Microsoft may not sell 50 million Zunes, but it’s worth being a contender.
You can bet Apple thinks this way. You can easily argue that, despite its sheen of innovation, Apple is far more conservative than Microsoft. Apple TV is a bit of an anomaly, but with no major hardware refreshes and a few small-minded software updates, you can hardly accuse Apple of throwing good money after bad. Presumably Apple TV was a learning experience for Jobs & Co, one they’re not likely to repeat.
With that in mind, let’s look particularly at netbooks and ebook readers.

Like Notebooks, Only Littler
Netbooks are cooking, but it’s well known they’re cooking because notebooks are not. A netbook was originally conceived as something miraculously small and simple, running Linux with a warm fuzzy interface that dear old gran could use to bone up on pinochle before Friday’s showdown with the Rosenfelds. But instead of growing outward to this new audience (always with the grandmothers, it seems), it grew inward, cannibalising real PC sales.
The Linux fell away, mostly because it was ill-conceived, and these simply became tiny, cheap, limited-function Windows PCs. They may have been a 40-million-unit business last year, according to DisplaySearch, but they only got cheaper, and the rest of the business was so depressed nobody was happy. (And just ask Ballmer how much he makes on those XP licenses, or even the “low-powered OS” that is Windows 7 Starter.)
Point is, nerds may love their netbooks, but the market that the netbook originally set out to reach is too far away, running farther away and screaming louder with every blog post about what chipset and graphics processor a netbook may or may not have, or whether or not it is, indeed, a netbook at all. Clearly the audience is cheap geeks, and while that may be a good market to be in (just read Giz comments), it’s definitively not Steve Jobs’s market.
Easy on the Eyes
Now, about that Kindle. Best ebook reader out there. Every time we say that, we say it with a wink. We totally respect the Kindle (and I for one have hopes for Nook once it pulls itself out of the firmware mess it’s in), but we think e-ink is a limited medium.
Its functionality is ideal for a very specific task – simulating printed words on paper – and for that I have always sung its praise. The Kindle is ideal for delivering and serving up those kinds of books, and as a voracious reader of those kinds of books, I am grateful for its existence. But there are other kinds of books of which I am a consumer: Cookbooks, children’s books and comic books. (Notice, they all end in “book”.) The Kindle can’t do any of those categories well at all, because they are highly graphical. E-ink’s slow-refreshing, difficult-to-resize greyscale images are pretty much hideous. No big deal for the complete Dickens, but too feeble to take on my dog-eared, saffron-stained Best-Ever Curry Cookbook.

So, e-ink’s known weaknesses aside, let’s talk again about Ballmer’s favourite number, 50 million. Guess how many Kindles are estimated to have been sold ever since the very first one launched? 2.5 million. Nobody knows for sure because Amazon won’t release the actual figures. Guess how many ebook readers are supposedly going to sell this year, according to Forrester? Roughly six million. In a year. Compare that to 21 million iPods sold last quarter, along with nine million iPhones.
I am not suggesting that the iPod or iPhone is a worthwhile replacement for reading, but I am saying that, for better or worse, there are probably at least 2.5 million iPod or iPhone users who read books on those devices.
Are you starting to see the larger picture here? I am not trying to convince you to buy an Apple iPad, I am trying to explain to you why you probably will anyway. As the Kindle fights just to differentiate itself while drowning in a milk-white e-ink sea of God-awful knockoffs, you’ll see that colour screen shining in the distance.
Sure the iPad may not be as easy on the eyes as a Kindle. But you will be able to read in bed without an additional light source. You will be able to read things online without banging your head against a wall to get to the right page. And, once the publishers get their acts together, you will be able to enjoy comics, cookbooks and children’s books, with colourful images. Even before you set them into motion, dancing around the screen, they’ll look way better than they would on e-ink. (I haven’t even mentioned magazines, but once that biz figures out what to do with this thing, they will make it work, because they need colour screens, preferably touchscreens.)

Tide Rollin’ In
So we have this new device, carefully planned by a company with a unique ability to reach new markets. And we have two types of products that have effectively failed to reach those markets. And you’re going to bet on the failures? The iPad has shortcomings, but they only betray Apple’s caution, just like what happened with iPhone No. 1. Now every 15-year-old kid asks for an iPhone, and the ones that don’t get them get iPod touches.
We can sit here in our geeky little dorkosphere arguing about it all day, but as much as Apple clearly enjoys our participation, the people Jobs wants to sell this to don’t read our rants. They can’t even understand them. My stepmother refuses to touch computers, but nowadays checks email, reads newspapers and plays Solitaire on an iPod touch, after basically picking it up by accident one day. That’s a future iPad user if I ever saw one.
Jobs doesn’t care about the netbook business, or the ebook business. He’s just aiming for the same people they were aiming at. The difference is, he’s going to reach them. And the fight will be with whoever enters into the tablet business with him. Paging Mr Ballmer…
PS – If I’ve gotten to the end of this lengthy piece without telling you much about the iPad at all, it’s because other Giz staffers have already done such a handsome job of that already. If you missed out, here are the best four links to get you up to speed:
• Apple iPad: Everything You Need To Know


















matt
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:22 PMmeh, I’m not everyone else, so I don’t care.
tell me something, what is the ipad better than the rest at?
the iphone had a bit of jack of all trades, master of some going for it, specifically, it let you do stuff you could never do before in a pocket sized device.
I just can’t see that here?
and what makes the ipad a better ereader than say, a netbook? its got the same lcd screen?
Zubei
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:01 PMNo it doesn’t have the same LCD screen as a notebook. It’s a LCD TOUCH SCREEN. The most critical feature of the device…
Junereth
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 1:19 AMYou guys are missing the point of the article. What the author is trying to get at is that the iPad doesn’t NEED to be the best here, because apple is aiming for a market that doesn’t particularly care if they have the best e-reader or netbook. The accessibility of the iPad is it’s one greatest strongpoint, and the fact is, people will eventually flock to it just like how people think of iPods whenever you say portable music player. I’m not happy about this either, but let’s face it. Geeks are a minority, and apple has it’s eyes set on the rest of the world, and the rest of the world is probably going to respond in favour to Apple
Joe
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:35 PMBest article I have read all day, gets past the deflation from the over hype, with no apple fanboy or apple hater nonsense. I’m facinated with the aspect this product introduces to the general public when the magazine and newspaper publishers realise the potential. I am however concerned that with all the supposed talks between apple and print publishers that the presentation glossed over print media oppurtunities
Thomas Gribben
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:49 PMI still perfer e-ink as the screen on laptops/netbook hurt after long reading sessions.
MDolley
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:53 PMI have to respectfully disagree. The iPod made such an impact because most people didn’t even consider that they could get digital music on the go.
Netbooks are selling like crazy, even my mum has had two of them (She upgraded from an original 7″ linux Eee). For those millions of people with a netbook there is no real gain in the iPad. No matter how much Gizmodo says otherwise.
The iPad is just a pretty store front for Apple to make their 30% on content sales. It’s not magic, it’s not a revolution. It’s just a direct connection to your wallet with a 9.7″ screen.
Mark Giles
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 10:06 PMGod damn it. As much as I hate to admit it, you’re absolutely right. And that’s the reason I (and many other people) are up in arms about this.
There’s other devices out there. They do the same thing better. But they’re hard. And that’s the point. Jane down the road doesn’t care what you can do with your netbook or eBook reader. She just cares if she can use it without exerting any brainpower to make it happen.
Giz readers are often the kind of people that will choose function over form. Sadly, that’s not what the majority of people are like. Simple to use, a “magic black box” where it actually doesn’t matter how anything works, as long as it works.
Jobs is a man that understands the populace. And understands what they want.
Ian Galbraith
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 10:06 PMAnd what will all those people reading cookbooks and the like do when they realise they can’t use it in direct sunlight? The iPad is not the same as the ipod or iphone cause it doesn’t do anything better than existing items and its overpriced.
Philip Mayes
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:21 PMIs your kitchen outside? I don’t see this as being the dealbreaker that everyone is touting it to be.
CS
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 10:36 PMThe author has a point. But still I’m not completely convinced as of the moment, due to some reasons – specs and the absence of multi-tasking.
For me, I’m skeptical about this device the same thing as I was skeptical before with the original iPod. I used to hate the original iPod because it’s not a drag-and-drop-file gizmo, but now I have an iPod Touch and I realised the usefulness of it not just listening to my music collection but limited web browsing and games as well.
With the iPad’s big screen, it gives me an idea of instant internet surfing on a ‘normal’ screen without the hassle of 15 min boot of a normal PC/Laptop.
But still, I’m not yet convinced given the hardware specs, software features, limitations and absence of multi-tasking. If Apple will eventually introduce these features on future hardware revisions of iPad, I might consider this device.
Jordan
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 3:06 PMExaggerations though- my MacBook starts up to a browser in less than thirty seconds. It’s light, portable (13″), powerful and do-it-all. But then again, i’m a geek and need a proper computer.
Were I using my computer exclusively for emailing and web browsing, the iPad would be fantastically sufficient. It’s a house cat though, can you imagine how much of a dick you’d feel like if you took it on the bus?
One thing i think we’re failing to talk about is the application development potential for a multitouch surface so large. I collect audio hardware. Imagine mixing several music tracks together, in real time, with multiple fingers controlling separate parameters… on a light, portable device with high-quality audio output. Beautiful right?
matt
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:57 PMhey, I don’t know if this has been covered, but I read on the dev portal that the ipad will support proper files and documents management like on a PC? like documents will be associated to apps, and you can click on them and it will open it with the app ect.
there will also be some sort of file sharing stuff that allows it to act like a normal file sharing PC?
if this is true, it should be able to stand up better as a stand alone device, rather than as a slave to a MAC. you will be able to create content and manage files just like you do on a PC?
Terry O'Fee
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 12:12 AMI have to disagree with the netbook side. When I take a small netbook with me away on holiday, I like certain things like multiple applications open at the same time, the option to plug in a USB HDD, browsing websites properly without that dreaded flash icon….
as for an ebook reader?? yeah, i can totally see that. It might be reflective and all, but i normally read inside so that’s not that big of an issue for me.
i’m looking for a second mac after my newly purchased imac. this is not it. this is the third, after i’ve paid off the laptop…
mr-crash
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 12:16 AMI think there’s some good points here, but also a few points that rub me the wrong way.
If they only showed one thing, netbooks showed that there’s a (pretty big) market for cheap, basic PCs. That you can sell a device that really only does the bare minimum. However, the experience seems to be that this is pretty much price elastic. Expensive, similarly spec’d gear with a lot more polish (such as the macbook air), seems not to fair as well. If you think the air is an unfair comparison because of size, look at sales figures for Sony’s netbooks and you’ll find a similar story.
I also think the ubiquity (and entrenchment, as well as wider recognition) of the netbook is being understated. A lot of the people buying them weren’t geeks. My grandpa picked one up, just because it was easier for him to carry around. My sister bought one, for the same reason and because it was super cheap. If it breaks, it’s not a huge deal.
I think if they’re looking for casual web users, who do really consume media rather than doing much in the way of producing it, they’ve failed in their implementation of it.
I mean, are you going to tell someone they can’t use facebook chat and other IM/email at the same time? Or that if someone links them to a video on any hosting site other than youtube that they can’t watch it?
Flash is crap, but surely there’s a degree to which you have to match existing usage paradigms before you can reshape them. I know people will say this is fixed with HTML5, but that’s certainly not ready for prime time yet.
I think what is most interesting about this device (in its current iteration. I’m quite happy to say that I think v2 or 3 will be fantastic) is Apple’s gamble with content providers.
This device lives and dies by the quality of content. If people see it just as a book reader – it’s a pretty pricey book reader. If that really is all they’re looking for, then they’ll go the Kindle 2, which is half the price.
If they’re looking for something with a bit more variety (and they’re not put off by the pricing), then what really needs to shine is some beautiful content. The NYT app looks slick, more like that will sell it. But if developers aren’t seeing the same growth in the installed base they did with the iphone, are they likely to spend much time working with it? I’m not so sure.
I think we’re likely to see a lot of scaled up apps, at least in the short term and the short term is very much what apple needs in order to best utilise the whole “shiny and new” factor they’ve got happening right now.
I don’t think this will ever have the same ubiquity as the iphone or ipod, because it’s just not portable the same way as either of those devices. You can’t just stick it in your pocket and forget about it.
Anon
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 12:37 AMFunny thing about iPad and netbooks, I don’t really think of them as on the same tier. Where with a netbook you’re buying a fully functioning computer; an iPad is just a platform for books, games and a web feed (and those mediocre novelties they call ‘apps’).
I bought a netbook about a year ago, not expecting to use it much. I have a powerful desktop, I just needed something cheep to use while I wasn’t at home. The thing cost me $600AUD.
I’ve used the thing at uni, nearly every day. Excellent for taking lecture notes and browsing the net while on campus. But the iPad can do that too, so whats the difference?
On my breaks I take my netbook into my office, connect it to a monitor and use it as a software development work station. I can also run mapping software on it, and graphic design software.
When my desktop broke down, I plugged in my mouse, keyboard, monitor and speakers and used it as a gaming machine.
When my neighbours computer broke, I used my netbook as a mobile platform for getting info on how to repair his computer and to get the required patches.
What I’m getting at here, is the iPad isn’t a computer. It can’t handle the things that computers can do. It can’t run software designed for a desktop OS (like OS X). It can’t even multitask.
A netbook, however, IS a fully functioning computer. It’s just less powerful.
William Irving
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 12:43 AMsee the ipad is designed for people like my mum … wanting seamless easy way to read and watch movies on her own in private away from the rest of the house. she liked the idea. she liked the large screen and the big battery and the ability to check her email without getting out the laptop. she wanted one. then i told her that it couldnt multi task so if she didnt want to completely close her book/movie she would have to get the laptop out to check her email anyway. or in fact if she wanted to take 5 seconds to check the weather on the bureau of meteorology website she couldnt without closing her book/movie.
she is almost 50. and she said …”thats like going back to the dark ages” then i told her the price… and she said “id much rather that amazon book thing and continue to use my laptop or everything else.”
so im thinking they missed …just a tad. on thier target market.
however knowing samsung and asus atm im sure they will provide a better option soon hell my omnia mobile has more funtionality then the ipad and almost as much processing power. so the ipad better watch out. for once they didnt manage to be first AND best at once
dunnage
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 4:28 AMHilarious to use Ballmer as a marketing guru: zune to be someday.
Public forced Ballmer to keep XP; and what was that before Windows 7?
Six million e-readers vs. 9m iphones — that’s chump change?
The iphone worked for anybody that tried the thing — wow, so rare. But ipad — the Kindle reads in any lighting, free 3G, music, and portable size.
Go the size of the ipad and I don’t think netbook; rather just give me an 13″ XPS with 256 graphics.
Now if the ipad cost $99 I’d buy a few and toss them at the kids.
Stefan
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 8:12 AMhang on how is it supposed to handle video, on their website they make no mention of a graphics card… and the processor is like 1 Ghz, but yeah as the article talks about. most n00bs dont care…
Heath
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 9:34 AMIt’s integrated graphics run off the A4 processor. A 1ghz processor in a mobile device is powerful. Considering that devices like the PSP Go! runs at 480mhz and the iPhone 3GS runs at 600mhz, 1ghz is nearly a revolution (but a lot of high end mobile devices coming out this year will have 1ghz processors).
Steve
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 8:28 AMDepending on your use of a netbook, the iPad doesn’t even come close. I often use my netbook to work on the go, I’ll have Outlook open, be working in Word at the same time as I go back and forth, and probably have music playing through headphones. Currently the iPad isn’t setup to allow for that type of use. I also have the ability to connect to external displays, such as monitors or televisions, which I have done quite a bit. I can attach it to projectors to give presentations, I can easily connect USB, slide in an SD, without any need for adaptors. I can use my netbook wirelessly through 3G, and has a standard SIM slot built into the chassis. It performs a lot of functions, and I only paid around $450 for it.
The screen on my netbook is physically a little smaller, but has a widescreen res which means little of the screen is wasted when watching movies. The iPad is no doubt a better eReader, the shape, size, and function simply lends to that. If people are looking for readers with extras, then the iPad is great. But for myself, that would be a huge step backwards. It may sell very well to the target market, but I’m quite disappointed, I’d hoped for something that would come close enough to my netbook to be considered, but at this point I couldn’t lose the netbook function.
Sandy Wong
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 9:44 AMRecently thinking to get apple’s imac so that I can start do some designing work…But I think there will be plenty of time for me to think bout it before sending any peny =]
Mal
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 10:49 AMA very good article indeed and well reasoned points. I may have missed something here but I find it interesting that it seems to be an article providing possible reasons for people that don’t read this site to buy the iPad.
Was this in an effort to stay our anger when we see people enjoying its use in the future as we mutter to ourselves thinking “but device X does all these things and more, and is cheaper. All you have to do is configure it like this, add a shortcut here etc.”?
klaw81
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 11:25 AMThe iPad has some definite potential, but it’s certainly not currently in a position to take the world by storm and it’s certainly no threat to netbooks.
iPhone was popular because people bought and used phones already, so an iPhone with its “advanced” features was a logical upgrade. It’s the phone we used to carry, but with media and gaming capability.
In contrast, people don’t commonly carry tablets or e-readers already, and probably already have a featurephone or smartphone. If they need a more versatile and powerful device, they might have a netbook or perhaps a small notebook. The iPad isn’t good enough to compete with either smartphones or netbooks, nor is it cheap enough to entice people to switch for economy. Besides, if you want a portable entertainment device, the iPod Touch is half the price of an iPad and has 90% of the same features.
This effectively relegates the iPad to staying at home for the vast majority of users, and that means it’s competing not only with handhelds, netbooks and notebooks, but desktops as well.
The iPad simply doesn’t make a case for use by anyone except Apple fanboys who already live their lives inside Apple’s ecosystem.
Zac
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 4:13 PMAt last a good article from someone who understands from someone else’s point of view. And still, there is people commenting here who refuse to understand what you just wrote. Just cannot get through to some people – their world view is closed. Steve Jobs is not marketing to people like you anyway, and there is no great loss.
I have a netbook and it does everything my PC does but the novelty has worn off. Due to it’s size and limited processing power, it is now more frustrating to use, and it needs maintenance that a full blown OS requires.
The iPad is more like an appliance, switch it on instantly, do what you have to do,enjoy it, switch it off (standby), and there is no maintenance required. That it. Done. No high maintenance full OS required or needed. This is what Steve Jobs is aiming for and there is a market for it. The iPhone/touch has proved to people that you don’t need a full blown OS to read email, write documents, read documents, listen to music, use facebook, do banking, good web experience etc. A full blown OS is a hindrance to this. I am one of those ‘geeks’ that interested in memory, CPU specs, mulit-tasking, what type of screen is used etc, all the technical stuff, however, I also understand what the iPad is aimed for, and I am one of those who wants a device like this – I use the iPod Touch for this very purpose. I do not want a desktop OS crammed into a small form factor PC/laptop.
Kris
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 5:08 PMI remember when the first gen iPods came out I thought, “Why would you buy that? The music quality isn’t as good as a CD.”
But I bought a 4th gen one.
I remember when the iPod touch came out, and thinking, “Why would you buy that? A touch screen is just a gimmick.”
Then I discovered the Apps and WiFi.
For much of Apple’s success, the initial response from many people has been “Why would you buy that?” But the worldwide sales figures show that many people respond like me. After the initial “Why?” (during which period the Apple fans buy up big), the discovery comes that it does *most* of what you want *most* of the time, and that seems good enough.
Sure, it’s not a netbook, but it’s small enough. Sure, it doesn’t multitask, but it does “good enough” functions like iWork. It’s small enough to be a better “reading on the train” option than a broadsheet newspaper. It’ll potentially damage the portable DVD player market, too. I’d ideally like an Apple netbook, but the time may come when the iPad is “good enough”.
Red T-Rex
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 5:38 PMThe Geeky side of me is saying no-no-no but the business side is saying yes-yes-yes. I only have to look at how my wife, parents, and neighbours struggle with technology to see how good this device can be.
This is “Keep It Simple” at it’s best and the reason behind the success of the iPod. This is also what ultimately limits Netbooks or Windows OS based devices from dominating. Not because Windows 7 sucks, because it doesn’t, and certainly not because of it’s flexibility or ability to connect easily to networks and other devices. For a lot of people this is just way too complicated. Too many choices, too many paths to go down before getting lost.
Look around you at the people you pass in the street, or stand next to at the counter. Most of them ultimately want their life simplified not made more complicated. Most want less choice not more. A fair number of them actually want decisions made for them. This is not saying all people are like this because they aren’t but for too many, the technology simply gets in the way.
In the case of the iPhone/iPad, this is where the lack of multi-tasking is a benefit. Sure there are some power users who want to have many things on the go but how essential is this really. How many iPhones are currently happily being used without multi-tasking. It may be the very lack of multi-tasking that is assisting it’s success.
Also, Jobs is a businessman first and foremost. He understands business very well. He knows it is better to get to market quickly with a good product but also to hold back some of the fruit to ensure future rebuys. Sure the iPad lacks what some would say are essential features but are they really that essential? No camera at launch, well boo hoo! Who really cares. Plus it’s a nice little feature to provide in a later version. Do you think it is just bad engineering or bad business decisions that leave out features that are available in one form of the iPod when others get it. Camera, radio, video have all been incrementally released across the product line instead of all at once and despite the tachnology being cheaply available. Has this affected the sales? Not one bit. Stand back and watch a master of business at work here. A lot of people take the time to satirise Jobs and Apple (including me) and what is often pointed out is the boring predictability of Apple announcements (January, June, September – thereabouts). An incremental upgrade here or there and then every 2 years a new product. People, take notice, this is the master busines plan. If you want to run a successful (product based) business then this is how you do it. Ignore at your own peril.
As for the coming windows tablet devices, take note. You can pile on all the fruit for the launch (cameras, usb, etc.) but it won’t guarantee a kill of the iPad. It will also require a more smartdevice style interface.
Disclaimer: I am not an Apple fanboy. The only Apple product I own is an old 40Gb iPod Photo model that I still use at work every day. I actually run a Windows media centre home theatre via my xbox360 so mainly Windows through and through.
William Irving
Saturday, January 30, 2010 at 5:05 AMatm im hoping samsung get off their arses to deiver something along these lines. PC is one of the few places that samsung havent tryed in this sector. they are i would say are the best suppliers of great quality electronics/flat screen tech atm. an AMOLED touch panel pc with a heavily samsung-i-fide version of win 7 or android would go down quite well with me. and the omnia, galaxy and HD phones are pretty convincing proof that they could make it work on a big scale.
Craig Muldoon
Saturday, January 30, 2010 at 12:47 AMFantastic article, as others have said it cuts out the so called apple fanboy or hater crap, just says it how it is from a neutral business, market, and success standpoint. Thanks.
Cindy
Sunday, January 31, 2010 at 3:14 AMSome good strong points made here-a nice read. I for one, will not be buying the iPad for a reading device or for any reason.
I do not think that most people will feel compelled to run out and buy one just because it follows on the heels of the iPhone either. I do not have an iphone either, by the way.
To me, the ipad will never replace the Kindle, regardless of how many are sold.
Paul
Tuesday, February 2, 2010 at 1:46 AMA great article, I think the same, there must be heaps of people out there wanting to access the internet, but not wanting to buy a computer of any type as they are far too ‘technical’ – windows updates, viruses, etc etc.
I would love one, for all those times when I either want to do a quick surf, for say the weather report, of for browsing while sitting on the couch next to the wife (sure, I could use my laptop, but this seems so much better for that environment)
John McKenzie
Monday, May 17, 2010 at 2:40 PMThink of all the trees that the Apple will save!