
“In many ways this defines our vision, our sense of what’s next.” – Jonathan Ive
PCs will be around as expert devices for the long haul, but it’s clear that Apple, coasting on the deserved success of the iPhone, sees simple, closed internet devices as the future of computing. (Or at the very least, portable computing.) And for the average consumer, it could be.
It’s the “internet device” vision of a decade ago all over again, except now Apple can offer what is arguably the best user experience for internet and media consumption combined with a very reasonable (for a brand new gadget) price.
It may not be good for you, because you’re an internet dork who wants to do heavy video editing or run Photoshop. (Or, you know, multitask.) But for the average person off the street walking into an electronics retailer, their laptop money may now be going to an iPad.
What happens when they find the iPad is all they needed in the first place? They never buy a laptop again.
In the meantime, here are a few things to think about for we full-time dorks.
Does it kill netbooks?
If there’s anything that you can take home from today’s announcement of the iPad it’s this: From here on out the battle between physical keyboards and touchscreen ones has moved beyond smartphones and into every other area of computing. Get ready to hear someone say “I touchtype just fine on a soft keyboard on my PC” very soon.
I’d be lying if I said the giant bezel doesn’t ward me off a bit, even if I understand why it’s necessary to be there. But it isn’t as sexy as it could be, all things considered.
But a 0.68kg device with a (theoretical) 10-hour battery life? Done and done. Heck, I’ll haul two.
Yet I will buy the dock! Perhaps, even if I am frustrated to no end that they are not simply supporting the Bluetooth keyboard. But I suppose that is that – this really is what Apple imagines the future of laptops to be.
Belay that! A couple of you have pointed out that the Bluetooth keyboard is in fact supported! I am a’flutter.
But it’s a lot more likely I’ll carry around an iPad than a netbook.
What about the add-on keyboard, though? I sort of love it, but it is so very un-Apple to have a keyboard attachment. And all the dongles. And only a VGA output, not DisplayPort! It seems like the iPad came from an alternate dimension.

Productivity
If typing on the iPad’s soft keyboard is even slightly faster or more comfortable than typing on an iPhone, they could have a productivity winner here. But I sort of doubt it’s going to be comfortable enough to use for hours of typing at a time.
For emailing, attachment browsing, and the like, though, I think it’ll be a pretty powerful little device. Its form factor is perfect for pulling out of a little executive bag to check mail or show off a PDF to a coworker.
The new cloud-based iWork looks amusing, but who really wants to switch from Office to iWork? Email and other web-based tech is still the most portable solution. On the other hand, a functional iWork is what convinces your CTO that you can use the iPad to display PowerPoints.
Screen Aspect Ratio
There was never going to be a perfect size, especially since movies are widescreen, but a single page of a magazine or book is decidedly not. Yet the aspect ratio, which is something close to 4:3 (if not exactly), surrounds widescreen movies with a lot of black, especially when you include the bezel. I would expect future iPad models to lengthen ever so slightly, but not much.
3G Access
250MB for $US15 a month; unlimited for $US30. No contracts. Unlocked SIM slot. Completely reasonable.
Of course, it uses AT&T, so if you’re in NYC or San Francisco you’re screwed. But it also means you could switch in other carriers’ SIM cards if you like.
And the free Wi-Fi access in an AT&T hotspot – presumably only if you’ve paid for some AT&T access – won’t hurt.
That the iPad is unlocked, though, also means that T-Mobile could potentially roll in with a 3G option for even less money.
Pornography
It’s simple: You can hold something that weighs 0.68kg in one hand.
Relaxation
A few have mentioned how sitting down with an iPad may feel casual, less prone to send one into “work-mode”. I can buy that – but that will also serve to delineate use-cases between laptops and iPads, making the iPad seem more like a toy.

Reading
Don’t call it a Kindle killer. Books on iPad will probably be more expensive than Kindle’s titles, at least at first. And there’s nothing about the iPad’s screen that will make it better for reading than, say, a laptop. But having a dedicated iBooks store? That’s good for everybody, including iPhone and iPod touch users.
And for anything colour – comics, children’s books, magazines – the iPad will destroy what e-paper can do.
Multitouch
Here is the thing to know: When it comes to multitouch, consider the iPad the harbinger of all the interface tricks that will be coming to iMac and MacBooks in the relatively near future.
VoIP
It has a microphone. There’s no reason to think it won’t be able to do VoIP.
All in all, I think they’ve got a category-straddling winner here, but it’s a bit of a gangly pseudopodal mutant at the same time. It doesn’t kill the laptop or the PC quite yet, but you can at least see how Apple intends to choke the life out of those markets.
Don’t like that? Better get to work on a better tablet.




















Rhys
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 11:34 AMNo flash means its a crappy internet device. It’s just unbelieveable that Apple would let something like that fall through the gaps. Half the internet simply wont work.
And HTML5 is not a replacement, it’s coming, but it wont overtake flash for a long time yet (dare I say longer than the lifecycle of the 1.0 iPad?).
Matt
Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 1:12 PMNo flash is great! I have ‘click to flash’ on an imac and love it. It blocks all the ads and keeps your computer cool and idling instead of revving. If you open activity monitor and watch what flash does to the the cpu inside of safari you will see it’s at 100%. With flash on a mobile device you’ll be lucky to last the length of your favourite cat on a turntable video. BTW sorry Gizmodo most of your ads are nothing more than a lovely gradient.
Apple obviously feels very strongly about flash to cripple its devices like this. Now with 3 devices it will only speed up the shift to a more efficient flash replacement.
As for the comment about ‘choking the life out of the laptop and PC markets’. I don’t think Apple is wanting to choke life out of markets it is in. One of the main taglines they use is “iPad creates and defines an entirely new category of devices that will connect users with their apps and content in a much more intimate, intuitive and fun way than ever before.” They want to keep opening new revenue streams wherever possible. Not close them down. It will be consumers choices that will choke the markets, not Apple’s. If they keep selling volumes in each category they will keep making and improving them. If they don’t sell, they will fade away.
Rest assured Apple would love you to believe you need all their products, not just one.
Tom
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 10:31 AM“It has a microphone. There’s no reason to think it won’t be able to do VoIP.”
The iphone has a microphone too, and a speaker. How many VoIP apps are there on the App Store. Hmm…
Craig Muldoon
Saturday, January 30, 2010 at 12:23 AM1 now, more to come. An more than you need for those with a jailbroken iPhone.
Iain Henderson
Friday, January 29, 2010 at 9:49 PMYou’re right about the iPad not being a “work mode” device. The form factor is much better suited to sitting on a couch, wandering around the house or laying in bed.
In fact, Considering it’s “lifestyle” appeal I think Apple missed a massive opportunity with the iPad: They should have included an IR & RF transmitter so you could use it as a universal remote.
Look at the Logitech Harmony remotes. What are these devices but $400 touch screens with an IR and RF transmitters? The expensive part is the screen, the transmitters cost next to nothing.
Even better, Apple already has an iRemote App for controlling iTunes. They could have added Universal remote functionality on top of it. It could have shipped with configurable generic hardware profiles. and you could download pre-configured vendor supplied profiles with in-App purchases.
Who would buy a $400 touchscreen remote when a $500 iPad could do so much more.
Craig Muldoon
Saturday, January 30, 2010 at 12:27 AMTotally agree. When i first seen this the very first thing i imagined doing with it was using it to control my media centre – which although i can do with the iPhone will be better with the iPad. In saying that though, i wouldnt pay $400 for a universal remote, let alone double for the iPad with that in mind. But like you, i think not having the IR & RF transmitters was a missed opportunity.