
It feels like a repeat of the same shit Universal Music and NBC Universal pulled with iTunes, trying to counter the leverage Apple had because of iTunes’ insane marketshare. Same situation here, really: Content provider wants more money/control over their content, fights with the overwhelmingly dominant, embedded service that’s selling the content. Last time, everybody compromised and walked away most happy: Universal and NBC got more flexible pricing, iTunes got DRM-free music and way more TV shows to sell.
The problem publishers have with Amazon is two-fold: Amazon’s overwhelming marketshare in ebooks (because that leads to more control for Amazon, and less for them) and the establishment of $US9.99 as the price of a book, which publishers feel cheapens the value of books. (Hardcover bestsellers go for up to $US30, after all.)
The difference in this fight is that Macmillan is one of the publishers signed to deliver books for Apple’s iBooks store. They have somewhere to run to. It’s a credible threat. That wasn’t really the case with record labels, who tried to fuel alternatives to stem iTunes power, and failed. Interestingly, this little episode seems to prove Brad Stone’s earlier account in the Times that publishers were looking to Apple to save them from the tyranny of Amazon, since Apple allows publishers to set their own price.
The $US15 price point Macmillan’s pushing to Amazon is a little curious, given two things: Steve Jobs told Walt Mossberg books in the iBooks store would cost the same as they do for Kindle, and the WSJ reported last week $US15 was one of Apple’s recommended price points for books. Removing Kindle’s price advantage would be a savvy way to kick off iBooks, no? The publishers get more money, and iBooks cost the same as Kindle books – everybody wins, except Amazon. [Bits]




















Richard
Sunday, January 31, 2010 at 2:38 PMThis is truly scary. If a customer bought an ebook on a kindle and it just one day disappears what kind of recourse does the customer have? Surely this is illegal. They would have to return all those accounts with the money? That sounds like plain theft. You pay money for something and then it disappears??
molo
Sunday, January 31, 2010 at 6:51 PMi dont think anyone lost prior bought books.
Tristan
Sunday, January 31, 2010 at 7:48 PMNot sure they were pulled from devices this time around…
Ben
Sunday, January 31, 2010 at 8:18 PMWhere does it say that they will revoke existing purchases?
Stefan
Sunday, January 31, 2010 at 9:44 PMlol they should have just let them put the price up, then see what happens to the sales of their e-books… thanks genius’ yes it would go down xD