Put simply, Avatar is the most visually fantastic film I’ve ever seen. It will be hailed as the groundbreaking 3D release of its time while setting a new standard by which all blockbusters are measured. Yes, it’s that good.
I’m not going to talk about plot (or that I thought to myself, Dances with Wolves in space more than once). I’m not going to talk about dialogue or pacing (or that the limited narration was totally unnecessary). There are other reviews, more reviewy type reviews, that have all that covered. I’m not going to spoil anything, either. Heck, I’m not even going to talk about Avatar… not just yet.
I want to talk about Jurassic Park.
Jurassic Park was the first movie I remember being excited to an unhealthily obsessive level. My dad, a huge Michael Crichton fan, did his best to tempt my young self into reading the full-out book. So he told me a sort of good parts version, filling my head with tales of dinosaur resurrection from amber dug up deep in the Earth, all while I would do my best to get more and more out of him without actually having to crack open a book.
So when I heard Jurassic Park was becoming a movie, not only did that dash any chance of me reading the story, but I literally could not fathom a world in which I’d be patient enough to wait to see it (not that I had any other option). I mean, dinosaurs, theme parks and terror? Jurassic Park was biologically engineered for young boys.
All of this is nice background, but my point is simpler. When I saw those dinosaurs on screen, knowing that, in many cases, they’d been modelled purely by computers – computers! – I felt like anything was possible. Yes, it’s a cliché feeling. That’s actually why I’m sharing it. Because ultimately, we all have that movie – be it Star Wars or Terminator or whatever – that movie we actually felt a bit humbled, even challenged, watching because it was was an amuse-bouche of the future, even if a bit cheesy at heart.
Avatar is that movie for the new generation.
I don’t expect you to believe me if you haven’t seen the film yet. I, myself, was a huge sceptic until a few hours ago. Blue people? Papyrus font?? What the f—k happened to dinosaurs and light sabres and killer robots from the future? Did we use all the cool stuff up?
But about 30 minutes in to the film, you realise that the marketing has undersold the movie. In an era when every great moment of a film makes its way to a trailer, Avatar surprised me with an endless amount of unparalleled optical overload. Every single shot is just so full of detail that you literally open your eyes wider to take as much in as you can before each cut.
Gizmodo readers will love the tech, especially as that about 50 per cent of the film’s budget apparently went to rendering badass 3D curved displays and absurdly awesome cockpits. But sequences from Pandora’s woods at night… let’s just say they’re the first luminescent visual effects I’ve seen that made 1982′s Tron look like a 27-year-old movie.
![]()
Of course, Avatar‘s 3D is the basis of my obnoxious zeal for the aesthetics. I viewed the film in a full-sized IMAX theatre. And while I knew that a fair share of missiles would fly off the screen (and ZOMG the mechs look amazing), I couldn’t have expected the sheer tangibility that 3D – what I once supposed a gimmick – added to the experience. I mean, I saw textures in this film that I’ve never seen in a movie before, like wet, rubbery skin on the wildcats of Pandora that made people around me gasp more than once. There’s a more understated moment, too, when Sam Worthington shaves and you realise, wow, stubble is pretty remarkable in 3D. The jagged hairs bring a level of humanity to his character, adding something unexpectedly corporeal to what’s really a 10m tall head in closeup.
So yes, 3D is more than a gimmick. The glasses are still a pain, but 3D is here to stay.
Avatar doesn’t handle this new technology perfectly, however, and I hope that other filmmakers learn from its mistakes. Especially early in the film during shots in close quarters, the direction allowed many objects to break frame (think of a person walking from one end of the screen to the other). For my untrained eyes, seeing a figure go from 2D to 3D to 2D was not only distracting, it was tiring. And the same can be said for a constantly shifting depth of field – based upon where the camera is focusing, you’ll need to figure out whether to look deep into the screen or right in front of you.
An out of focus shoulder breaking the corner of the frame is pretty much the worst implementation of 3D I could imagine. Luckily, the forest sequences that make up the majority of the film seemed to have been planned with a wider depth of field – more of the shot is in focus.
After two-and-a-half hours in the theatre, I am exhausted way more than the same amount of time playing an FPS would make me, but Avatar was so remarkable that it was well-worth the work of watching it.
I still can’t imagine popping on a pair of glasses to watch the evening news after a long day of work, and I sympathised for the guy sitting beside me as he started rubbing his eyes about halfway through. As someone with a slight uncorrected astigmatism, my left eye was ready to fall out of its socket by the final climactic sequence.
But as viewers, we’ll adapt to the new tech. And as technicians, Hollywood will learn the rules of 3D as it writes them.
So for now, I’m not quite ready to see every piece of the world’s media in 3D. But Avatar? Yeah, I’ll be seeing it again… and maybe again… just in hopes of absorbing a bit more of the visual splendour.




















brendan
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 9:00 AMGreat review – you took the words out of my mouth. Avatar sets a very high benchmark that a lo tof movies will struggle to meet. The 3d was great but I haven’t seen it in 2d to compare but I suspect it would still be awesome.
Jazzy
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 10:21 AMI saw it in 2D and was still amazed by the sheer detail and imagery. Pity about the plot otherwise it could have been without doubt one of the best movies of all time.
Travis New
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 1:25 PMAmazing movie! I loved it.
Jed Stevens
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 2:05 PMThe movie was great but 3D sucks wang. this is the last 3D movie i will see, i think it makes the screen darker and a little blurry (Compared to 2D) it also makes my eyes sore.
Graham
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 3:51 PMIts true that each eye gets less light from the screen than in a regular 2d movie but I think they tend to bump up the brightness of the movie to compensate for that. I was talking to a mate of mine today who has some partial vision problems in one eye and wondering how he would go watching the 3d version of avatar, he was never able to see those 1990′s stereogram images properly. If you are seeing a blurry image after you put your glasses on perhaps you have a problem with one of your eyes or the system was not tuned properly. I also wonder if there is any difference depending on where a person sits in the cinema as to the image quality.
matt
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 6:45 PMapparently the quality of 3d cinemas can vary greatly. did you see it in one of the new dual digital projector cinemas? i.e. the best?
Jon B
Sunday, December 20, 2009 at 12:44 AMI agree. My feeling after seeing it was that I’m not going to bother seeing another 3D film again. In some of the early scenes the actor’s faces while indoors seemed to have shadows over them, making it hard to see. I had an urge to take off the glasses to see properly. And any time a character was dead centre of the screen they looked kind of blurry to me and I felt slightly crossed eyed.
I have read it does make a difference to the 3D quality depending on where you sit in the cinema. I would like to see the film again but this time I will see it in 2D (and not for the plot or the oh-so-cliché love story that bordered on being childish).
Other than that, visually stunning scenes abound.
Rohan Rance
Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 5:57 PMDid right there by not talking about the films plot and etc. You can’t accuratly describe Avatar in plain text I don’t think.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, then what’s a moving picture, over two and a half hours long and in 3D?
It’s just a great film. I’ve been telling people just to go see it when they ask me what I thought of it.
To overhype it as a ‘game changer’ might put peoples expectations in a place the film can’t reach. But then again, not pressing on people how visually stunning, interesting and exciting the film is, difficult too.
Just go see it. Be open minded and go see it.
Matt Tiley
Sunday, December 20, 2009 at 12:12 PMUnreal!!! I am judging that on my obsession with everything Avatar after seeing it in 3D last wednesday. Ok the story isn’t the greatest or original, there was alot of clique’d characters ie. the big bad boss straight out of a video game and his money hungry pen pushing boss who doesn’t care about anything else but cash,cash,cash.. but after the first 10 mins of this movie you realise you have never seen anything like this put to film in your entire life. Not only is this the best use of 3D ever, there are no cheesy gimmicky use like in “My Bloody Valentine 3D” where the crazed gunmen points the gun barrel down the camera lens intended to jump out at the audience. No instead Cameron has built a fantastic movie with the added bonus of transforming you dead centre into the middle of this unbelievable breathtaking universe which you will find hard to believe someone has made this all up in a computer. And yes the story has been done before dressed up differently but it’s by no way one of these weak or cheesy scripted movies which makes it hard to watch a second time with the cringe worthy dialogue, no the writers (which I believe Cameron pretty much wrote and created the whole thing) have done an excellent job in keeping up with the extraordinary visuals.
Anyone complaining about the 3D being blurry or shadowy on the faces, all I can say is it looked crystal clear as a bell at cronulla cinema’s probly 15 metres from the screen dead centre (5:30pm advanced screening session only 30 people in cinema). My eyes were fairly blurry when I walked out of the ciema but for what I had just seen was an easy trade off.
Seriously I was blown away at how good it looked and finally actually felt like I was experiencing the future right then and there and I was excited and relieved that the next gen of film was in great shape.
Im seriously not going to bother getting a new LED or another Plasma, because the only way Im dropping another coulple of grand on visual entertainment will hopefully be the latter part of next year when 3D televisions will drop on australian shores and into our homes.
Anyway I try to talk a movie down a bit before people see them so there isn’t the hype factor and some mountainous expectation to live up to but with Avatar I don’t see how anyone could be dissapointed.. people will always pick good movies apart but surely they can sit back and just enjoy what I believe to be one of the greatest achievements in cinema of my generation (i am 28). I just hope James Cameron is the the drivers seat for the next big movie in the NEAR future.
But just go to the cinema and experience what this classic movie offers in the 3D future..
AMAZING!!! 10 out of 10
Wok
Sunday, December 20, 2009 at 3:50 PMSaw it in 3D, wish it was half the length and/or in 2D.
Neil Nuttall
Monday, December 21, 2009 at 1:39 PMSaw it Sunday and while we all agree that the story is nothing new, this movie is totally awesome. This is what 3D was made for.
http://neilnuttall.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/pandora-i-want-to-go-there/
Anthony Tam
Thursday, December 24, 2009 at 12:24 AMLoved it in 3D, but would love to watch it again in bluray and/or regular 2d so I can appreciate the scenes without being forced to focus on the 3d elements.
story is cliched, but visuals it is not -so really this is the best use of the medium for the type of familiar plot.
4D BABY!
Friday, January 22, 2010 at 9:40 PMI have seen Avatar 2 times. First was in 3d with crappy seating right up front on the left side and everything was distorted..I ended up closing my eyes due to the strain and I am embarrassed to say I fell asleep.
2nd time was in 4D in Seoul and it was freaking amazing. I mean the smells, wind, moving vibrating seats, there was even a little thing that shot out at your feet when ever anyone fell from tripping. When they fell if the chair didn’t rise up or tip you would feel a bump in the back or on your bottom depending on how the character fell. The smells were strange when it cuts to the scene of pandora you would smell a fruity flower smell and when the fight scenes happened and there was fire you would smell a fire smell it was UNREAL!