OK, Now I’m Nervous About The Large Hadron Collider

I used to think that nothing would happen with the Large Hadron Collider. I even made fun of the nutters saying it’s going to destroy the world. After reading CERN Director for Accelerators’s latest statement, I’m not so sure:

The LHC is a far better understood machine than it was a year ago. We’ve learned from our experience, and engineered the technology that allows us to move on. That’s how progress is made.

Wait wait wait. WAIT, Mr Director for Accelerators Steve Myers, Sir. What do you mean that the machine is “far better understood” now? How could they spend a billion bazillion dollars on this thing and not understand it in the first place? Do we really know what are we up to here? Should I book a ticket to Costa Rica and go watch the end of the world from the beach?

The LHC is now circulating beams for the first time since September 2008 when it suffered a serious malfunction. It has taken them a year to repair it, which will explain the origin of the Universe or kick all of our atomic arses out of it.

The LHC is back

Geneva, 20 November 2009. Particle beams are once again circulating in the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, CERN*’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This news comes after the machine was handed over for operation on Wednesday morning. A clockwise circulating beam was established at ten o’clock this evening. This is an important milestone on the road towards first physics at the LHC, expected in 2010.

“It’s great to see beam circulating in the LHC again,” said CERN Director General Rolf Heuer. “We’ve still got some way to go before physics can begin, but with this milestone we’re well on the way.”

The LHC circulated its first beams on 10 September 2008, but suffered a serious malfunction nine days later. A failure in an electrical connection led to serious damage, and CERN has spent over a year repairing and consolidating the machine to ensure that such an incident cannot happen again.

“The LHC is a far better understood machine than it was a year ago,” said CERN’s Director for Accelerators, Steve Myers. “We’ve learned from our experience, and engineered the technology that allows us to move on. That’s how progress is made.”

Recommissioning the LHC began in the summer, and successive milestones have regularly been passed since then. The LHC reached its operating temperature of 1.9 Kelvin, or about -271 Celsius, on 8 October. Particles were injected on 23 October, but not circulated. A beam was steered through three octants of the machine on 7 November, and circulating beams have now been re-established. The next important milestone will be low-energy collisions, expected in about a week from now. These will give the experimental collaborations their first collision data, enabling important calibration work to be carried out. This is significant, since up to now, all the data they have recorded comes from cosmic rays. Ramping the beams to high energy will follow in preparation for collisions at 7 TeV (3.5 TeV per beam) next year.

Particle physics is a global endeavour, and CERN has received support from around the world in getting the LHC up and running again.

“It’s been a herculean effort to get to where we are today,” said Myers. “I’d like to thank all those who have taken part, from CERN and from our partner institutions around the world.”

Discuss

(11 Comments)
  • [–]

    Glenn

    Saturday, November 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM

    The whole point is to study theoretical physics… So maybe you should calm down a bit. Of course they understand it more now. The Thoery was sound but engineering something that goes outside of what was the current understanding always means they understood the “practicalities” of it less then than they do now. All Bleeding edge engineering is like that.

  • [–]

    Sam Brady

    Saturday, November 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM

    A term like “Experimental physics” would tend to lend itself to the exploration of ideas. Trying to understand and optimise (brand new) technology such as this accelerator is not tantamount to trying to dumbly stride towards turning the film Event Horizon into a documentary.
    Idle quips like yours pop up in every media report I’ve read about the LHC, and are largely the reason why idiots feel justified distrusting the work of professionals who know far more than they ever will about how the world works. You should comment objectively and leave opinions to slashdot, where the writer is at least likely to have some kind of physics background. That way the article will come off as interesting to everyone, rather than inept and homogeneous to anyone who actually cares enough to read the article.

    • [–]

      Peter Lindsey

      Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 1:16 AM

      Sam, if the intent in your comment was to be absolutely arrogant and condescending, then congratulations. If you haven’t noticed the lhc doomsday thing is a little running joke that people with actual friends have. Oh, and by the way, intelligence isn’t measured by vocabulary and grammar.

      • [–]

        Tinfoil-hat MAN!

        Wednesday, September 1, 2010 at 5:42 PM

        I come from the future! He’s logic is sound and you have no place to critise him for his own opinion. ” arrogant and condescending” On the contrary, he shows an informative piece, but it is still just an opinion and “a running joke amoungst people with real friends”, he is confronting just that. These opinion pieces such as in the author mightn’t do too much harm, but its a pain in the backside when you have complete right wing conservatives who have no idea what they are talking about, complaining.

  • [–]

    Donald Everson

    Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 1:03 AM

    if over the weekend somebody there say’s oop’s how long before world sucked in upon itself. Will i have time for one last meal and glass of wine.

  • [–]

    simulacrum

    Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 1:04 AM

    Guys I think you’re overlooking the grains of salt with which I suspect Jesus intended this post to be taken.

  • [–]

    Nian

    Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 2:56 AM

    Sadly people make mistakes, those professionals you speak of are every bit as human as you and I so therefor that can make those fatal mistakes we are so very much worried about.

    Did you know that these so called professionals had their counterparts in the manhattan project and those scientists had a quibbling fear that the nuclear bomb may, yes may just cause a chain reaction in the atmosphere and kill everything on earth. They still went ahead ofcourse and although we survived, was the risk worth taking? Some things shouldn’t be left to chance, if the possible accident would wipe out the human race then it shouldn’t be done, and damn all the scientists who think otherwise.

    • [–]

      Tinfoil-hat MAN!

      Wednesday, September 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM

      “Some things shouldn’t be left to chance”

      Cough cough. Well humanity, a surprising un-realistic freak of chance, is still going strong.

  • [–]

    Daniel

    Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    @ the author:
    Do you realise what you said made no sense?

    “What do you mean that the machine is “far better understood” now? How could they spend a billion bazillion dollars on this thing and not understand it in the first place?”

    Of course they knew about the LHC when they first introduced it. They could’ve known so much. All these quotes are saying is that they know “more” than they did back then. Whether it be a little bit, or so much, they know more now because they’ve had it for so long. In fact, you would hope to god (literally) that they would know more now.

    Saying “we know more about it now” does not disregard their knowledge for it back then. That is pathetic for anyone to make such a statement.

    I think you should maybe rephrase that.

  • [–]

    matt

    Monday, November 23, 2009 at 10:12 AM

    I’m sure splitting the atom was “experimental physics”, I can understand why people might be unnerved.

  • [–]

    Nato

    Monday, November 23, 2009 at 5:18 PM

    Give it up CERN if the world of entertainments has taught us anything there are only a few outcomes.

    Total annihilation of the world in 2012.

    One of the CERN scientists will be involved in a bizarre accident and be turned into a superhero

    or the fulfillment of the following

    There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexeplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

    RIP Douglas Adams

Join The Discussion