
We’re gonna be talking in-ear earbuds—canalphones, really, or in-ear monitors, if you’re snooty—since all the good stuff goes deep into your precious earholes. We aren’t talking about headphones because great headphones aren’t the most discrete things around — can’t defeat physics, children. Unless you derive some sick pleasure from jogging with a pair of giant cans bolted to your head, earbuds are the way to go.
Whether you’re talking about headphones or earbuds, they work a lot like loudspeakers, just miniaturised. The key element in both are drivers, though earphone drivers are a lot smaller, and do a lot less work to make the same music.
There are two main types of drivers: The a dynamic driver works just like a traditional one in big ol’ speaker. The benefit of the dynamic driver is that it produces a nice bass response, though it can be hard to miniaturise.
A balanced armature driver is pretty common in serious in-ear monitors, since it’s easy to shrink down. Originally found in hearing aids, it houses a magnetic armature that moves when an electric current runs through the coil, putting pressure on the diaphragm, creating sound. It can be, and often is, paired with a dynamic driver.
Most earbuds just have the one driver, though more and more have multiple drivers. That costs more ’cause it’s harder to cram more than one into a tiny casing meant to rest gravity-free in your ear. With multiple drivers also comes a “crossover network”, circuitry meant to divide music into different frequencies and route them to the appropriate drivers, an additional payload to stuff into that tight space. Once all that is crammed in, however, multi-driver earbuds typically sound better than single-driver ones, because the woofer, tweeter and mid-range horn are more innately equipped to handle their own domains of sound — from boomy bass to sizzly treble.
Among the least expensive multiple-driver earbuds are Apple’s fancier AU$119 in-ear earbuds, which use two drivers, a tweeter for highs, and another for everything else. It gets more expensive as you creep up. Shure’s three-driver SE530 lists for $US500 (but can be found for much less). Ultimate Ears’ UE-11 Pro, which will run you a ridiculous $US1150, come with a correspondingly ridiculous four drivers. That’s one for mid-range and one for highs and two for bass.
Some companies opt for a single driver because they think it’s better, since there aren’t complications with crossover networks, trying to get all the drivers to work together to produce seamless sound. On the other hand, with a single driver, you’re asking one driver to do everything: highs, lows and mid-range, says Stereophile senior contributing editor Michael Fremer Fremer. (Yes, that Michael Fremer.) That’s why , FutureSonics, for instance, makers of pro monitoring gear, charges so much for their single-driver earbuds. “A really good single-driver can sound really good,” says Fremer.
Besides more drivers, what you get in pricier earbuds is (surprise, surprise) better materials, finer build quality and a more focused design. Michael Johns, headphones manager for Shure—known for earbuds with MSRP ranging from $US100 to $US500 but rarely double digits—told me that most of the really cheap ($US20) headphones on the market are basically rebranded crap from no-name factories, and that when you buy those with suggested retail pricing between $US50 and $US100, you’re mostly paying for style, not sound. The top-tier brands, of which there are many, tend to design and engineer their own headphones. The expense of that is, unfortunately, passed on to you.
The cost of raw ingredients is also passed to you — the cable material, the magnet behind the diaphragm, the diaphragm material itself, the overall quality of the driver, and the enclosure. (Again, all of the stuff that jacks up the price of higher quality loudspeakers too.) None of that stuff, when it’s well made, is cheap. Fremer says, for instance, that better headphones actually use stronger magnets than cheaper headphones. As you might guess, the more powerful the magnet, the higher the cost.

So, uh, what’s the sweet spot price for great headphones? If Shure and Fremer had their way, everybody would spend upwards of $US200 on their earbuds, but if you twist their arm, they’ll agree that $US100 is where buds start getting decent. The real trick, according to Fremer, is just getting people to “spend that first hundred bucks”.
The law of diminishing returns tends to kick in above that point: The difference between $US300 set of buds and a $US400 pair is nowhere near the jump from $US20 to $US100. Even smaller is the difference in models between generations. Although the best value on the market might be a previous-gen version of Shure’s 500 series buds at a cut rate ($290), but if you can find $US100 earbuds for $US70, it’s even better.
Whatever you do, for christ’s sake—and yours—ditch the iPod earbuds.
Mic Cullen
October 3, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Totally correct, and will be totally ignored.
Report Permalinkall day
October 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Any set of decent headphones will blow those iPod headphones and what ever else is included with your media player away. Spend the money, your ears will thank you for it.
Report PermalinkGary Tong
October 4, 2009 at 8:02 PM
The iPod headphones are really no good.
Report Permalinkmatt
October 5, 2009 at 10:13 AM
I wonder if they could put the crossovers in the players? to free up some space. means more wires going from your player you your ear buds tho, but they wouldn’t need to be thick.
Report PermalinkIndulis Bernsteins
October 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM
The other thing with the more expensive headphones and flanged silicone tips is that you get almost the same sound reduction as the expensive battery-chewing noise canceling phones.
The makers could also put the crossovers into the 3.5mm plug or into a small dongle near it to remove the weight from the earbud itself.
Oh, that, and dilithium powered oxygen free copper ;-)
Report Permalinkbryn
October 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM
The main problem I have with splashing out on higher end in ear headphones is that the weak point always seems to be the cable. I have ruined a couple of headphones by either having the cable catch on something as I walk or simply wearing out in areas that bend more often.
Report PermalinkElly Hart
October 6, 2009 at 12:43 PM
I keep losing the interchangeable plug things. I’m gonna super-glue them on next time.
Report PermalinkJinn
October 30, 2011 at 3:34 PM
Be sure to let it dry completely before you use them
Report PermalinkTom
November 3, 2009 at 5:30 AM
BS…I’m throwing the challenge flag on this one. Price has very little to so with the sound quality of headphones. It has everything to do with availability and demand of the product. Sony Fontopia ear buds (such as MDR-E828LP) are an excellent value; they sound fantastic and are typically ~$20 pair. $129 Sony MDR-NC33′s aren’t even close in performance. Death by sibling rivalry. Yeah, Klipsch x-10′s fit and sound great for $400, but Byrn hit it on the nailhead. Just as you blow 100 bucks on some new fancy buds, the cord gets caught in a stack of books or between your ears and arm while reaching for something and PHOOMP! there goes the cord. Worse yet, set your nice $300 noise canceling ‘phones down to go grab something out of the microwave only to come back and to find the cat eating the cord for breakfast.
Report PermalinkRob
August 26, 2010 at 1:11 AM
…. or the little foam covers come off and go missing? Where can you get new ones from? Buy a new set if earphones seems to be the best solution.
Report PermalinkLiam
August 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM
I have used these, or ones like them for the last 10 years or so:
Sony Mdr-Ed12Lp/Slv Budstyle Headphones
( http://gadgetophilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/sony-mdr-ed12lpslv-budstyle-headphones.jpg )
I love them. Not only is the bass reproduction great (due to the rubber airspace), but they are way more comfortable than in-ear phones.
Or do i just not know what good sound quality really is?
L
Report Permalink