
Seidenberg’s points are sometimes fair, though often seem feeble. Net neutrality would bar providers from granting faster access to whomever they please, and Seidenberg suggests this will slow the transfer of, say, medical records. Mostly, though, he seems concerned with Verizon’s profit margin if tiered service is banned, saying that will take away Verizon’s ability “to make a return on their investment”. The legislation, despite protests, is likely to pass, given that the five-person committee is controlled by pro-net-neutrality Democrats. Seidenberg really goes to town on the FCC, claiming they’re favouring application providers like Google (who, along with companies like Amazon and Facebook, has voiced support for net neutrality) rather than service providers like Verizon and Comcast.
Check back tomorrow to see more coverage of this topic. [CNET, image also CNET]
Michael Walker
October 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM
The more that they fight the more we need net neutrality. They need to realize they are not going to stop the open internet from happening.
Report Permalink