
The Air Multiplier runs $US299 for the 10-inch version and $US329 for the 12-inch version. I tested the 10.
I’ll admit it, after hearing that Dyson was making a fan, I never imagined what greeted me upon opening the otherwise inconspicuous brown box. It looked like a giant magnifying glass.
I tentatively plugged the all-plastic device in, unsure of the science behind the magic, but not really caring for the moment. I hit a button I could only assume was for power, and the device roared to life like a very wussy hairdryer. My face was greeted with the same quality of air: a relentless, even stream that felt a tad more industrial than residential.

And, exploring the device more, I realised that while it didn’t look like any fan I’d used before, it worked almost exactly like every fan I’d used before.
For instance, one button toggled oscillation. Another twisted to rev the air speed (a smoother gradient of the traditional low, medium and high controls). And the base could be pushed forward or back, tilting the entire device in a manner more elegant but not entirely different from my $US10 job in the next room.

The bottom grills? Those are for the air intake, powered by what I’m assuming is an internal fan. (Oh, this fan has a fan, you just don’t see it.)

Truthfully, I’m almost embarrassed for liking the Air Multiplier. There’s no doubt that any Dyson vacuum demands a price premium for its fashion-forward design. But ultimately, this premium is relatively small. All good vacuums cost a few hundred bucks, so the Dyson upsell is somewhat reasonable &mdash ;tempting even.

But like it, I do.

Completely unique design

Safe (no external moving parts)

No doubt, it’s great at fanning

Probably easier to knock-off than a vacuum

Not loud, but far from silent

Costs about a bajillion times more than any fan I’ve ever bought
Ricwulf
March 12, 2010 at 3:48 PM
I saw this today while at a lecture in the Powerhouse Museum, and I must say, it is definately a remerkable piece of technology.
Report PermalinkIt works on a basis, that although it blows only a tiny bit of air, the movement of the air blown, creates air behind the fan to suck through, so it is definately a + for the environment.
And btw, it will not be easier to knock-off than a vacuum, cause of the fact that it has a patent. I’m in year 11 and I know this!
Any way, it is definately a good product, and I can see it replacing the normal fan, just like the bagless vacuum that dyson first made, replaced the old vacuums.
Daniel
April 26, 2010 at 2:09 PM
US$300 maybe expensive for a device that blows air across the room, but so does a US$3000 Eames chair that supports your buttock and a discounted US$2000 Gucci bag so many female think it’s a bargain. The “wow” factor from visitors and friends is the whole point.
Report PermalinkAinslie Duke
January 24, 2012 at 7:46 PM
I am impressed with the idea.is this what is called”thinking inside the circle”.
Report PermalinkCan’t see why it is so expensive though.