
AU: For the record, RIM’s Australian arm has never been reluctant to invite Giz AU to events or send us review units. Of course, we always have to wait for handsets to launch down here, but even with that we’re always given the same level of access as all other tech media outlets in the country. –NB
It’s been total radio silence from them regarding a review unit, so we’re late with a review. I’m sorry we can’t provide our usual level of speed and depth on the device; normally, we’re provided with a review unit at or ahead of release and have the time to put it through its paces. But apparently we’ve been blacklisted.
RIM’s never really liked Gizmodo or Engadget, or blogs in general. They gave review units to the NYT and WSJ, who went ahead and panned the phone, just like we would have. I don’t mind when we get put to the back of the list for that reason, the preference of old media over new. But this wasn’t just an anti-online decision — they also gave a phone to Crackberry, which far fewer people read. I don’t mind that website at all, but clearly RIM is pissed about something we specifically did.
Since they’re not responding to phone calls or emails now, I can only guess its because Engadget (god bless them for breaking the news on this) did a hands-on of a Storm 2 Handset six months before it launched. Before it was even acknowledged that it existed. Understandably, RIM got pissed, although you’d think they’d get pissed at themselves for allowing the leak. But that doesn’t explain why we weren’t allowed to check it out. My hunch is that they knew we’d savage it. That’s OK, it’s not their responsibility to hand out review units to us if they don’t want to. We’re a small publication in the grand scheme of media.
But it does send a very clear message to me: Blackberry doesn’t give a shit about you guys, our readers. You’re so unimportant to them that they don’t care if you get a review from the people you read every day at Gizmodo. I think it’s a mistake on their part, but if they don’t want you to buy their phone, in the end, that’s fine. Because the Storm 2 is garbage, and you shouldn’t buy it. I mean, these guys clearly have no idea how to make a phone for anyone but their original market of old dudes in suits, nor how to market to anyone but them. And that’s their problem, not yours, not ours.
Either way, I’m sorry we couldn’t tell you this based off our own in-house review. Now you know why.
P.S. Me and the guys are secretly happy we don’t have to review yet another piece of shit touchscreen handset (FYI, our opinion was informed by Walt and Engadget’s impressions, and has nothing to do with the politics of the situation.) If it was really worth reviewing, we’d go out and buy one for testing. I promise.
Thomas Witt
October 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM
I’m an old dude in a suit, and I love my 8820. It’s well over two years old and it works just as well now as the day I bought it. I have zero use for touch screen phones. iPhone? Meh. Storm 1 or 2? Meh, meh.
Report PermalinkRick.
October 17, 2009 at 4:41 PM
Sounds like a bit of sour grapes guys.
From the reviews I read and watched online it’s come a long way from the Storm 1. Professionals are more likely to hold out for the 9700 Onyx / Bold 2. The storm 2 is more entertainment driven, a certain direction change for RIM.
Report PermalinkJames Golfis
October 17, 2009 at 5:33 PM
Just another bunch of cranky corporate shits. Honestly, its almost manipulation not giving the honest hearted reviewers a unit.
Report PermalinkRobertC
October 19, 2009 at 4:18 AM
Petulant nonsense from Brian Lam and Gizmodo. Is it any wonder why RIM is hesitant when you whinge like babies and throw insults like a 7th grader?
It is also interesting that you’ve let the cat out of the bag when it comes to reviews. Thanks for admitting that Gizmodo is a biased publication that reviews technology with predetermined views. Forget the fact that the Storm 2 is a considerably improved effort over the original iteration. Forget journalistic integrity.
You guys are pathetic.
Report PermalinkMatB
October 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Agreed, this is petulant juvenile behavior. Having a manufacturer send you something to review is an honor, not a right. Regardless of what you may think of their products.
It absolutely astounds me that any journalist would think this is appropriate behavior.
Report Permalink