A normal person sees these birds perched on electrical wires and worries about getting crapped on. Jarbas Agnelli looks at them and sees musical notes. Maybe he’s smarter than the rest of us because the melody is utterly oh-so-sweet-that-I-could-doze-off-right-now.
Agnel explains that he was simply curious about what sort of tune he could create by transcribing the birds into musical notes. I’m more curious about what would happen if he tried the same with the freckles on someone’s back. [Vimeo via Wired]
Evan
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 2:47 PMWhat a beautiful accident.
KBot
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 11:08 PMThere are significant voice leading errors. The birds clearly aren’t professionals.
Jen
Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 12:01 AMlol I love that you spotted that…kudos
bob
Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 7:15 AMWell, they took composition from Debussy, then.
Garrett
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 1:05 AM^SUCH a winning comment!
nick
Sunday, October 4, 2009 at 8:40 PMI think the music is neat. I just somehow like it and really that’s all that matters to me. However, as I can not satisfactorily find an answer written for someone who has no musical talent…..
please explain in simple terms what a voice leading error is keeping in mind I am far removed from being someone considered a musician.
Danielle
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 3:43 PMThere are certain rules that are meant to be followed when writing music with chords, which is the way most music is written. When going from chord to chord, there are certain things you shouldn’t do. (Of course, one can always break the rules, but you shouldn’t do that a lot because it’ll just make everything sound weird. Unless you’re doing that crazy contemporary stuff. That pretty much breaks every rule ever.) They’re called “Voice leading errors” because there are four “voices” that make up a chord. (Sometimes, they’re actual voices, sometimes they’re different instruments.)
I’m still learning about this stuff, so I apologize to all you theory geniuses if I messed something up.
Hope this helps.
Joseph
Friday, January 15, 2010 at 4:00 PMThey are birds for Christ’s sake! They aren’t medieval European monks! So what if the organum isn’t orthodox. And if you take that into account, I think their sense of compound melody is astounding.
jimmy
Friday, April 2, 2010 at 2:33 PMno crossing voices, hollaa!
Kbot
Saturday, April 17, 2010 at 12:52 AMLol. TOO MUCH VOICE CROSSING
Allie
Saturday, April 17, 2010 at 1:29 AMI think he was joking.
Eli
Saturday, May 8, 2010 at 6:25 AMScrew voice leading regulations. Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky didn’t follow those stupid rules. His music would have been ordinary if he did! Boo yah!
Hey way to catch the sweet bird notes buddy. Real sweet.
Rachmaninoff3
Saturday, January 29, 2011 at 2:26 PMSince when does “proper” voice leading constitute professionalism? Ever since the Romanctic Period, modern voice leading has broken every accountable rule there ever was for such musical devices. Furthermore, I’d like to point out that limiting music to “proper” voice leading would remove many staples from our current, renowned repertoire. This is art and has every right to be appreciated as such.
wray1jb
Tuesday, July 19, 2011 at 2:10 PMso if you actually know about music theory you would recognize that composition need not follow text book representation of musical patterns, voice leading is a consideration, the sound is the number one concern. XD
Aleksandar
Tuesday, October 6, 2009 at 10:13 PMThis proves theory that nature is full of beautiful things and nothing is accident.
Fry
Friday, April 2, 2010 at 4:51 PMOr it proves nature is full of beautiful accidents…
Russ
Friday, April 2, 2010 at 7:14 PMThere is no theory that nothing is an accident.
Caleb
Saturday, April 23, 2011 at 4:19 AMexcept the one that everything happens for a reason. it’s fairly common
Matt
Wednesday, December 23, 2009 at 2:49 PMI agree… even if it was shopped… (i don’t know if i have seen that word enough yet) it sounds beautiful.
Joey
Monday, May 17, 2010 at 8:55 AMIt’s called serendipity :P
JB
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 3:51 PMCreating beauty from chaos.
This is what nature is all about.
Anon
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 4:20 PMlooks shopped
Frizzle Cat
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 12:55 AMYou look shopped.
SHOP
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 8:39 AMYour comment accusing him of looking shopped looks shoppd
Greg
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 at 5:05 PMOvershopping can result in a rip of the space time continuum.
Yello!
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 at 3:34 AM… dare I say it?…………………………………………………………………………sh-sh-shopped…? (whimpers in fear)
Ken
Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 3:07 PMShoppity shoppity shop shopah shop!!
Peter
Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 2:35 PMI looked at the trap ray !!
Magdelion
Monday, July 25, 2011 at 1:39 PMyour face looks shopped
Julie
Saturday, September 12, 2009 at 2:05 PMAnon is right. pause at :15 then at :57. The clouds look strikingly familiar don’t they? But hmm the fake birds are missing! ‘Shopped! With this being said, the music is still very nice.
Charlie
Saturday, September 12, 2009 at 8:36 PMYeah because it takes birds a really long time to leave power lines once they get spooked.
Dom
Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 11:08 AMIt is not shopped I was there!
Flann
Tuesday, November 10, 2009 at 1:18 PMovershopping can lead to a lack of money…
Mike
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 4:29 PMNot to pick on the post, love the video, but you call him “Jarbas Agnel”, when the video clearly says “Jarbas Agnelli” :/ (check at 1:06)
Since this is moderated comments, I wouldn’t mind if you didn’t post this to the site and if I’m wrong, please let me know.
Thanks
Elly Hart
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 6:09 PMThanks for being so observant! I’ve fixed the typo :)
Victoria
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 5:25 PMprops for finding inspiration from something like that, but any good composer can make any pattern into music.
Anon
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 9:32 PMUm… isn’t that the point? :/
Omer
Sunday, September 13, 2009 at 3:53 AMExactly, any good composer can make any pattern into music. Congrats on being a good composer!
Colin Macdonald
Friday, April 2, 2010 at 4:01 PMI think you’re missing the distinction between a melody and a piece of music. Yes, he was observant and took a picture and made a musical theme. But how the piece plays on that musical theme is what makes it interesting. Many composers, including myself, have written songs that take their themes from birdcalls, so yes, the thematic content of the music isn’t strictly their own creation. But that sequence of notes alone doesn’t define the piece, it’s where the composer goes with it that keeps us listening.
That being said, I think he extracts harmonies and develops the material pretty friggin’ masterfully. Interesting to listen to, I’d like to see more experiments like this.
Longy
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 6:39 PMWhen viewed from a different angle, it would produce a different tune.
robb
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 9:13 PMwhat a beautiful song.
who cares if it’s shopped or not.
King
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 9:42 PMI thought that was pretty genious.
Tegs
Thursday, September 10, 2009 at 11:38 PMThis looks shopped. I can tell from the pixels, and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
Sarah
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 10:57 AMHow can you possibly tell that this is shopped? I grow weary of the green eyed interweb critics. Perhaps if you spend more of your time developing a personality, with it may come some talent and creativity.
Or maybe going into greater depth on your theory of the fake pixels may result in people taking you seriously. As we know allegations of Photoshop use online is a very serious business indeed. And will be met by severe punishment. Perhaps, expulsion from the internet all together.
Jake
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 3:40 PMThe cheeky sod!
I have just noticed that Mr Agnelli adds in one or two notes where there are no birds!
I know there’s such a thing as an artistic license, but that’s ridiculous!!
…Oh wait, the guy’s made music by looking at birds on a wire, stop killing his buzz by calling it shopped.
Some people are actually creative geniuses, and just because you can’t comprehend experiencing that kind of inspiration, doesn’t mean everybody is so crippled and cynical a soul.
I don’t have sound on my computer, so I shall watch this on my iPod momentarily! Avast, onwards!!!
…
:)
steve
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 8:14 PMThis clip is proof to nothing, as the whole thing is reverse-engineered.
Jared
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 at 6:58 AMthat was actually a inside joke that you completely missed. its a viral internet comment joke: “This looks shopped. I can tell from the pixels, and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.” someone somewhere once made that comment (i don’t think anybody actually knows where it was), and it has been the made fun of. the whole point is to make fun of really ignorant commenters who cry “shopped”. and you failed miserably in understanding that. congratulations, comment fail
Nick
Friday, February 11, 2011 at 12:39 PMConsider the fact that all the birds are on lines, and none on spaces. Therefore, they are all thirds apart, so it would be difficult to make it sound bad.
Latis
Saturday, September 12, 2009 at 4:16 AM…and as always, the masses always desperate to prove themselves smarter in some way than the average person fail uterrly by decrying fakeness while entirely missing the point of the video. (Much more eloquent than I could be –> http://xkcd.com/202/)
Very neat idea, if I had half a bean’s worth of composing talent I would even try it on my own… there have been plenty of times when the cedar waxwings have hung heavy on the powerlines near my place.
Clay
Friday, September 18, 2009 at 9:15 AM“Quite a few shops in my time”. Pft. Who are you, The Photoshop Expert? First of all, it’s not shopped. Pixels? Really? Try unfocused camera. Second of all, even if it was shopped, so what? It’s beautiful, and demonstrates the power of nature.
*bows*
alex
Monday, September 21, 2009 at 5:22 AMof course its shopped, half the birds are identical to each other.
still, good clip
Johnny
Wednesday, October 6, 2010 at 1:15 AMOf COURSE it’s photoshopped, unless he photoshopped the birds OFF the wire when he was adding the notes. It’s a beautiful concept, but he was too lazy to find an actual naturally occurring melody, so he made one himself.
Steve
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 1:17 AMFair enough it sounds good, but it’s quite clearly fake!
Wendal Kane
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 1:20 AMWhoever said that this is photoshopped is ignorant.
Pwnzord
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 9:17 AMYou’ve just been trolled
Johnny
Wednesday, October 6, 2010 at 1:22 AMThey’re not trolling (probably) cuz it really was photoshopped.
marbles
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 2:10 AMThere were some books written by Christopher Miller in 2002 and 2004 called Simon Silber: Works for Solo Piano and Sudden Noises fro Inanimate Objects: A Novel in Liner Notes, that feature transcribing birds on a wire as a form of found music. Both are rather interesting reads…
MRJ
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 3:52 AMSimpsons did it!
Tod Dog
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 3:54 AMThe hilarity that supposedly ensues when someone sarcastically claims that an image/video/etc is photoshopped (even though is hasn’t), has run its course. Not funny anymore. Please, for the love of God stop already.
ELBSeattle
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 6:38 PMYour indignation is obviously shopped.
j
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 4:02 AMthis was beautiful, but the dude who said creating beauty from chasos is a retard. It’s not chaotic at all dummy. It’s birds sitting on a wire. Not very good poetic description.
wesmwatson
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 6:50 AMAs I musician, I can tell that he did this in such a way that he wouldn’t need to Photoshop the birds to make nice music. First of all, he decided to make every note a “space” note, in layman’s terms, which makes it much easier than if he had made some “spaces” and some “lines”. Second, he arranged the rhythms in a way that he liked, which is also allowed. The positions of the birds doesn’t restrict that. He also got some flexibility on how he lined up the birds to make chords; there were several places where he could have done different arrangements. Lastly, he gets to control the key signature. I’m not sure whether or not he actually did, but that would make it remarkably easy to even control the pitches. So really, despite the fixed position of the birds(which were NOT Photoshopped in), the artist actually had a lot of control. I’ve done this sort of thing before with random scribbles on paper.
anon
Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 6:38 AMi wish gizmodo had a vote up button
Norbert Orsós
Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 3:03 PMYou said “the artist actually had a lot of control” and I agree. Those birds could be potatos on the grill, the united states congress wednesday morning, or twenty hedgehogs playing poker on the subway rails, or anything- if you control rythm,pitch, they are just a way chosing random notes. The whole process of creation comes off in the mind of the musician, and he says: for a composer it’s quite average…but for crows!-it is perfect. Ask Beethoven if he used such pathetic tricks.
John Obelman
Friday, December 10, 2010 at 8:22 AMI really hope that you’re joking.
John Percy
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 5:04 AMThis was done in the 1950′s by Steve Allen, when he was hosting the original Tonight Show. A guest handed him a photo of birds on a wire and, being the brilliant pianist that he was, he immediately composed a fabulous jazz piece that went on for several minutes.
tempest
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 5:28 AMThis is beautiful! And yeah so it’s shopped, but who Cares? Maybe the guy didn’t have a camera when he saw those birds and just wrote down the notes. But to give it a visual of actual birds, they created a picture for it. Ever think of that? Oh and yeah…it’s about the song…not the picture. Stupid. -_-
clever
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 6:05 AMclever way to get his music heard, shopping a photo like that
Dude
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 6:58 AMWhat the hell is this ? the song is shit , it’s completly random …nothing harmonious … you suck
Ugh
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 4:28 PMI’d accuse you of being deaf, but you actually heard something out of your speakers. That being the case, you are clearly mentally retarded if you think that this is “completely random and not harmonious”. The birds’ locations clearly define a harmony (there’s chords there–can’t make chords without harmony). There is no solution to your problem other that to STFU and GTFO.
ELBSeattle
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 6:40 PMThose who can’t do, teach. Those who can’t teach, teach gym. Those who can’t teach gym criticize others’ creative efforts because they have nothing else to do.
Itakru
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 at 10:54 AMAnd just who made you master of all music? 50 Cent? Get the goddamned Metallica or whatever other shit you listen to out of your ears already. This piece is beautiful, albeit a bit sharp in some places on the ears. I’m no composer, but it’s amazing to think that just by looking at something so simple, everyday, and ordinary and making it into something as touching as music is a skill that not many people could easily claim to have. You should learn to appreciate beauty a lot more.
lostone57
Monday, September 21, 2009 at 11:16 AMwhat was the point of making a comment with no insightful or thought provoking value whatsoever?
so you go to every website that allows users to post and say the most pointless idiotic pessimistic rot you can think of? you must really hate yourself, whether you admit it or not.
as they say nowadays, “quit hating.”
Kat
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 7:24 AMwho care’s if it shopped? It’s still beautiful, you really don’t have to spoil everything for everybody else.
Norbert Orsós
Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 2:21 PMThe idea is great- I have always ideas like that. Results are interesting but mostly very far from perfection, or beauty. We like it or not- nature not or very rarely works the way human beings’ thoghts and dreams about harmony (I’m not talkin about living creatures’ beauty, and function, but the causality, the way complexity correlates complexity-they are never simmetric/perfect) . fotoshop is real, and even if this one would be not a fake, it’ so unique , so godforsaken unrepeatable that we must not believe it, cos it doesn’t fit rules of nature (birds, wire, musicsheet have nothing to do with each other only in humans abstract, playful mids- yeah goddamn birds sit on wires, but it hasn’t been built for them!). Also we have a symple, perfect explanation of f0t0shop what makes us able to produce these things anytime we want, anytime we dream about perfection…
All in all: shopped xD we cant secede reality, that is what we live in
Greg
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 8:09 AMIt’s a nice tune, and it’d be a magnificent phenomenon if the story were true, but its shopped; We shouldn’t let that get in the way of our imaginations tho, wouldn’t it be a beautiful thing if it were true?
Birdkiller
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 8:10 AMIf you looked at it from the other side it would play backwards and say “We Love Satan!”
frankie
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 9:56 AMI wonder what the song would be if he played the pimples on my ass.
Loic Rathscheck
Saturday, September 12, 2009 at 4:08 AMIt is a random guess but I’d say playing the pimples on your behind would make more sense than playing the neurons in your brain because the latter would turn out to be pure silence!
Loic Rathscheck
Saturday, September 12, 2009 at 9:54 AMDisregard that, I suck.
Loic Rathscheck
Wednesday, September 23, 2009 at 12:53 AMSo Mr. xx (frankie), that was intelligent to use my name to reply to what I wrote. That is actually funny. Bravo, you are a genius, and I suck I guess! :-D
Mathilde Martínez Manzo
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 11:01 AMOh, wow! I don’t really care if this is shopped. It made me happy.
yeti
Friday, September 11, 2009 at 1:56 PMThere is a comic about this. I think It was made by farside in like..the 80′s? The idea isn’tnew either.
REGAURDLESS, this is well executed.