The Industry’s Response To Conroy’s Telstra Ultimatum
Most of these responses to Conroy’s bitch-slapping of Telstra came through yesterday, but they’re still worth a read. Personally, I’m disappointed by the lack of fireworks from Telstra themselves – I can’t help but think that if Sol was around, we’d have lawyers duelling pistols at dawn…
Here’s Telstra’s response to Conroy’s ultimatum for separation:
Telstra remains committed to working with Federal Government
September 15 2009 – Telstra Chief Executive Officer David Thodey today responded to the Federal Government’s proposed regulatory reform package.“While we are disappointed the government has felt it necessary to introduce this legislation, Telstra remains committed to working with the government to find a solution that is in the best interests of the industry, the nation, Telstra and our shareholders,” Mr Thodey said.
“It is Telstra’s view that many aspects of this package are unnecessary and need never be implemented if a mutually acceptable outcome can be reached on the National Broadband Network.
“Telstra supports the Government’s NBN vision. We are willing to discuss options around separation.”
Telstra will carefully examine the package over the coming days, he said.
“At all times, our approach to regulatory reform and the NBN will continue to be driven first and foremost by the need to protect the interests of our shareholders,” Mr Thodey said.
The NBN has been given the strongest possible board and management focus, including the establishment of a dedicated Board sub-committee, chaired by the Chairman of the Board, Ms Catherine Livingstone, and an NBN engagement team, led by Group Managing Director Mr Geoff Booth.
Telstra has done a large amount of work to ensure we have the best possible understanding of the complex and challenging issues around separation and NBN.
“We are actively and constructively engaged with Government.” Mr Thodey said. “Much remains uncertain, but we will continue to provide updates whenever it is appropriate to do so.”
Naturally, Optus weighed in on the discussion:
Optus welcomes landmark decision on regulatory reform
Optus today welcomed the landmark decision by the Federal Government to reform the regulatory environment governing the Australian telecommunications sector.“The Federal Government today made an important step in reforming the telecommunications sector with its proposed changes to the regulatory regime. It is a landmark decision that has the potential to change the entire telecommunications landscape forever, resulting in considerable benefits for all Australians,” Paul O’Sullivan, Optus Chief Executive said.
The Government’s draft legislation closely mirrors the model Optus put forward in its submission to the Government’s regulatory reform discussion paper on 3 June 2009. Optus has long advocated for a regulatory framework built around four key pillars including: structural separation; open access principles; cost-based pricing; and ACCC oversight.
Maha Krishnapillai, Optus Director Government and Corporate Affairs said, “We are encouraged by today’s announcement and believe that the proposed reforms will address many of the issues which have adversely impacted competition in the Australian telecommunications industry over the last 12 years. We look forward to examining the draft legislation in further detail over the coming weeks.”
“The Government has made its intentions clear. It is now up to the parliament, Telstra and the rest of the industry to ensure this long overdue reform becomes a reality,” Mr. O’Sullivan said.
As did iiNet:
iiNet Welcomes Telecommunications Regulatory Reform
15 September 2009 – iiNet, Australia’s third largest Internet Service Provider (ISP), has welcomed the Federal Government’s planned reforms to telecommunications regulations saying it will encourage competition and benefit customers.
While still examining the full detail of the reforms, iiNet’s Managing Director, Michael Malone, said requiring Telstra to separate and streamlining the competition regime were critical to the future of Australia’s telecommunications industry.
“The big winner from these reforms is the Australian consumer who will be able to gain access to fast, affordable and competitive broadband services,” Mr Malone said.
“It should provide greater certainty for the telecommunications industry and encourage investment, innovation and jobs.
“iiNet is well placed to continue our strong growth under the new world that will be created by the National Broadband Network and these regulatory reforms.
“We are a market leader in product innovation, customer service, content provision, backed by a strong brand, and will be able to compete on a truly open high speed network.”
So the question now is whether anybody cares? We probably won’t actually see any pricing reforms for a while yet, and while it’s always nice to see Telstra slapped around a bit (especially after the arrogant way Trujillo ran the company), what we really want to see is cheaper broadband (and ADSL2+ at my local exchange for ISPs that aren’t Telstra)…
- Next Post: Panasonic Karma Is My iPhone Game Console Dream »
- « Previous Post: Multitouch Supporting Bamboo Tablet Joining Wacom Family

Comments
I totally agree with your views. Why don’t the Federal Government think about the benefit its going to bring for 21 million hard working Australian, rather than the 1 million odd selfish money minded, blood sucking Telstra share holders.
“Cheap BB the way to go”
well you see barry, those 1million people have a little something known as money, and as we all know, money makes the world go round. so naturally, the interests of these people must come first. if you really want cheap broadband, get a job, buy some shares, and then you’ll be able to get off sites like these and actually have a say in the real world
Completely agree with Barry. I’m sorry, but when did the memo go out to shareholders saying that shares are no longer a risk, and are backed up a taypayer funded bailout? Rubbish. Shares are a risk, and seriously – this has been coming for ages, if the shareholder didn’t realise this – they shouldn’t have shares.
The amount of comments on newsites from shareholders playing the “poor lil aussie battler” card is making me physically ill.
finally.
Senator Conroy is a D@#$%&?D who is going out of his way to destroy one of our National Icons, and greatest achievements!
This move to destroy Telstra (well, attempt to, anyway), the controversial Internet filtering, the on-going debate regarding “R” ratings on video games… He needs to be given the sack, and NOW!
Senator Conroy, you are THE BIGGEST mistake to EVER happen to the telecommunications industry (and THAT’S saying something, considering some of the controversial people we’ve had in relevant places of power over the last 15 years or so…)!!!
Well at first, i felt sorry for the shareholders, and telstra – thinking this was another adventure of communications minister extraordinaire , but immediately after that, i remembered telstra for who they were. They are exactly as barry described. I couldn’t care less about what happens to telstra keeping in mind what they’re like. They charge like crazy and all they care about is their greed for money.
This article just opened my eyes up a bit more. It helped me look at the other side. I mean, if this will benefit all those workers, WHY NOT!? Like barry said, who cares about shareholders, especially when they know the risks involved! No, they are just greedy like telstra, and i’d much rather see these australians in jobs than to see these shareholders with another mercedez in their driveway. As having lost my apprenticeship through the financial crisis, i can say that a job is way more valuable to us australians, and we need to start thinking properly about where we are going.
Besides, it also means cheaper broadband! haha.
That’s my 2 cents
i would like to refer you to my reply to barry’s comment and add this:
-telstra as a single private entity has created thousands of jobs building and maintaining its world leading next g network
-telstra is currently creating thousands of jobs building both its 4g network and its new super fast cable network
-we are in the middle of a financial crisis, the splitting of telstra will devastate shareholders and give our already fragile economy another kick to the nads, one it really doesnt need. Telstra is one of the biggest company’s in Aus, and it is entirely Australian owned, unlike many other “australian” companies. we should be protecting its wealth, not sending it to the Optus bosses living it up in Singapore
Telstra should be split up, it should never have been sold as it is. It should have always been sold as a retail telecommunications provider, and the network wholesale provider remaining government owned, or sold as a entirely separate entity.
What I think will happen is that Telstra will split (they do not have a choice), and the shareholders will get a share in both entities. Therefore the shareholders do not loose out, they just now own shares in 2 separate entities.
What is the problem with that? I really do not understand why shareholders are winging, they bought a lemon in the first place, Telstra share prices has dropped since it was sold. Do they really think the lemon will become an orange with the leadership it has had?
Telstra now has a chance to remove a big money hole from their operations, lower prices, and start making money for their shareholders for a change.
Matt… world leading broadband? i don’t think so. We are one of few countries with the worst internet around. Look at Japan, France, Italy, England, America.
Honestly, who cares about geographically expanding our wireless internet, when we will still have the same speeds. Besides who will really use it out there enough to prove it as a better choice over upgrading to a faster internet speed altogether? What ever happened to australia wide fibre optic! that’ll benefit everyone no matter what!
And being privately owned, people may have jobs now, but they’re way more stable and secure under half control by the government. They could do whatever they wanted to… Just like every other business who has had to let people go.
As for the shareholders, i maintain my view on them. They are gambling in the first place. They can’t expect to be winning all the time. That is the nature of shares. Whether this was to happen, or something entirely different, they had the same risks.
As a Telstra shareholder and an Australian consumer I am very happy for the changes being proposed by the government. I stand to benefit much more from greater competiton in the marketplace as a consumer than from what value my shares have so far brought. If Telstra can’t compete fairly with the other providers it says a lot about the company.
Consumers shouldn’t have to pay money to Telstra to get a copper line connection and be locked in for three months+ with them when they want to connect to a service from another provider.
Telstra shareholders have had a long period of notice that the government was reviewing which model they would use to execute a Telstra split. Minimum of a year. The matter and question has been in the media and a point of discussion for a long period, especially with the announcement of the NBN.
If Telstra shareholders decided, in the face of this high probability, that they would retain their shares, then that is their decision. Which market sleepers did not know that this move was on the cards long ago? If you sleep you miss the bus…