Giz Explains: Microsoft, Standards And Damned Standards

The other week, we explained how Apple influences a ton of what goes on in tech by shaping industry-wide standards. This week, we're gonna look at Microsoft and what's it's done with standards.

Microsoft obviously has a more complicated relationship with "industry" standards, because anything it decides is its standard—even proprietary ones—becomes a kind of de facto standard for everybody else, simply because of Microsoft's overwhelming marketshare. This was more true in the past than today, with Microsoft playing ball with everybody else more often.

Microsoft's AV Club Let's start with Windows Media Audio—most commonly, it's known as Microsoft's proprietary audio codec that at one point fought the good fight again MP3, but is now much more, having grown into a sprawling family of various codecs with multiple versions. To name a few of the current ones, there's WMA 9, WMA 9 Lossless and WMA 10 Pro. Microsoft says it offers superior quality/compression over MP3, with "CD quality at data rates from 64 to 192 kilobits per second." Needless to say, while it's baked into Windows Media Player for ripping CDs and is supported by a fairly wide range of PMPs and phones, it obviously never displaced MP3, nor is it ascendant as the "new" standard like AAC (the official successor of MP3), basically since it isn't supported by the iPod, which owns over 70% of the MP3 player market. WMA Pro, despite being an even better codec than WMA, has more limited support still, mostly with Microsoft's own hardware, like the Xbox 360 and Zune.

WMA's more ignoble legacy, undoubtedly, is PlaysForSure, Microsoft's grand attempt to standardise the entire digital music industry (except Apple, or rather, against Apple) by getting everybody on the same page. PlaysForSure was technically a certification for players and services with a variety of requirements, but support for WMA, WMV and Windows Media DRM is what it amounted to in practice. Microsoft succeeded, for a time: Pretty much every PMP maker and services from Walmart, Rhapsody, MSN Music, Yahoo, Napster and others were all aboard PlaysForSure. Then it imploded. As every real music service went to DRM-free MP3, Microsoft re-branded it to Certified for Windows Vista. Which, incidentally, was a badge they slapped on the Zune, Microsoft's own audio player that didn't actually support PlaysForSure. When Microsoft ditched its own standard for its premiere player, everybody knew PlaysForSure was dead.

Windows Media has been more successful on the video front, with WMV. Like WMA, it's gone through multiple versions: At one point (WMV 7) merely Microsoft's take on the MPEG-2 standard, Microsoft actually succeeded in making it a genuine industry standard, with WMV 9 becoming the basis for the VC-1 codec that's backed by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. VC-1 is part of the spec for both HD DVD and Blu-ray, though at this point it's really just an alternative to H.264, which is becoming the dominant modern video codec. WMV saw some success as the codec of choice for some services during the heyday or PlaysForSure (since WMV support was part of the certification), but now it sees a lot of action as the video codec for Silverlight, Microsoft's Adobe Flash competitor.

Internet Exploder Silverlight itself actually isn't doing so bad, considering it's fighting Flash, which is installed on the vast majority of internet-connected computers. But like Flash, it's proprietary, which is obviously a bit disconcerting for people who want an open web. Which brings us to Internet Explorer. The early history of IE and Netscape is grossly complicated, but suffice it to say, being included with Windows eventually gave IE over 90% of browser marketshare. In other words, Microsoft defined how an overwhelming majority of people looked at the internet for years—meaning it essentially defined what the internet looked like. Microsoft essentially stopped moving forward with IE6, sitting on its arse for years, which is a problem since it's totally non-compliant with what most people would call modern web standards. (Short version: Web developers hate IE6.) With IE8, which entered a new world with Firefox having devoured a huge chunk of its marketshare, Microsoft supports actual real web standards (mostly—it still fails the Acid3 test miserably). And, they're actually serious about HTML5, even though they're not planning to implement the controversial video aspect at all.

Do You Trust Me? Obviously, Microsoft's in an odd spot in part because the constant spectre of antitrust allegations hang over its head—it's had to de-couple Internet Explorer from Windows in Europe, and it's moved to separate other stuff from the core OS, like even its mail, video and photo applications, making it harder to achieve the kind of de facto standards through sheer force of market like before.

Which might be part of the reason it's moving to make tech legit industry standards—besides VC-1 above, for instance, its HD Photo has become the basis for the successor to JPEG, now dubbed JPEG XR. Also, it's simply that standards matter more now than ever as people do more and more of their computing on the web, on multiple platforms from Windows desktops to Android phones, so industry-wide standards are way preferable to proprietary formats, even if most people still are on Windows.

Increasingly, if Microsoft wants people to use their tech, they're going to have to open it up in the same quasi-way Apple has (it'll also go a long way with the whole trust/control issues people have with Microsoft). So don't surprised if you see Microsoft continue to "open up" and "standardise". Just don't be surprised if the standards they embrace have Microsoft tech at the core.


Comments

    "if Microsoft wants people to use their tech, they’re going to have to open it up in the same quasi-way Apple has (it’ll also go a long way with the whole trust/control issues people have with Microsoft)"

    Please tell me your joking...

    Apple is a SHIT LOAD more closed, locked up and controlled than MS stuff! As I said before, the only reason Apple uses proper standards rather than making their own, is cause 1) they are lazy, they would rather steal whats already out there than try and make something better, and 2) they don't have the market share to influence what standards are used, they have to use "open standards" as a selling point.

      Hi matt, nice knee jerk reaction there buddy.
      Grand central ( a major part of the guts of snow leopard ) which was constructed by apple is now open source.
      The work that has been done on darwin by apple ( another major part of the plumbing in osx ) is open source. Webkit the renderer that powers safari , mobile safari , chrome , the android browser & a bunch of other "modern" standards compliant browsers is an open source project created & driven by apple. These are just the big ticket items that apple has created then released open source so any moron who knows how to use google can find , compile & use in what ever mad redneck science project they choose too.

      Matty perhaps it's time you took your head out of your butt & had a good look round. The last time microsoft was relevant & useful contributer to the world of computers was in the 1990's. Companies like apple & google even palm are all doing work that plays well with everyone, because they understand that closed software is a dank stinky little hole in the ground . much like the contents of your head.

        I guess your probably right, my main rage is directed towards the ipod. From itunes to the 'app store', 'open' would be the last word I'd use to describe the ipod/phone. The way I see it, sure their OS is open, but nobody cares about that, and its relatively low market share. Their ipod on the other hand dominates the market, and we get to see how 'open' they are in a market they dominate.

        @Matt... what a great sport dude...

    Hey Mik
    No-one cares if the 'major part of the guts of snow loepard' is open source. No really buddy, they just don't. Similarly, safari's openness or otherwise is mind bogglingly unimportant to 99.99% of computer users. What's annoying are crappy proprietary programs like quicktime and itunes, full of apple-only quirks, drm and advertisements. Plug your ipod back in dude and continue to worship at the altar of jobs - I bet it's all white, tactile and really designy - if a little overpriced and completely unhackable.

    mik, I'm glad someone on here knows what they're talking about.

    IE6, Why won't you just die?

    Hamish

    Show me the DRM in iTunes. Or Quicktime. Put up or shut up.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now