Hardware

ATI Stream Vs. Nvidia CUDA Graphics Accelerated Deathmatch

The eternal graphics war: ATI vs. Nvidia. With the rise of GPGPU computing, if you’re deciding who to fall in line with based on their graphics-accelerated platforms—Stream or CUDA, respectively—PC Perspective’s done the dirty benchmarking work for you.

It actually boils down fairly simply to a mixed bag: ATI’s Stream tends to be outright faster and pulls more of the load off of the CPU, but Nvidia’s CUDA tends to produce better quality results. Interestingly, PC Perspective seems to like ATI’s Avivo video transcoding application more than they used to, saying they’re impressed by its simplicity. But which side are you on? [PC Perspective via Engadget]

Comments (AU Comments | US Comments)

  • matt

    don’t care about these, can’t be bothered supporting multiple gpgpu sdks, hopefully directx11 compute shader works just as well, so we only have to learn one.

    I suppose that the manufactures developing there own sdks is good for non windows platforms tho.

Post Your Comments

Got something to say? There are two ways to comment:

1. Guests

Click here to comment instantly.

2. Facebook Users

Click below to comment using your Facebook account.

We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial or highly amusing. If your comments are excessively self-promotional, obnoxious, or even worse, boring, you will be banned from commenting. All comments are moderated.