Peripherals

Sonos CR200 Controller Leaks: Pretty Nice For Not Being An IPhone

I kinda figured Sonos was content to let people use an iPod Touch or iPhone to control their beloved wireless audio system, but lo, here’s a $US350 capacitive-touch second-gen controller, leaked from their own product pages, to prove me wrong.

Though the sales pitch on the somewhat pricey CR200 matches that of the free iPhone/iPod Touch app: Wireless multi-room control of ZonePlayers throughout the house, quickly access music, automatic updates bring new features. With capacitive touch glass screen, 2-5 days of battery life, rugged body and removable battery, the thing is justifiable as a standalone product, if there wasn’t a “free” alternative.

But there’s one claim that seems to be a dig at that the iPhone app alternative: “100% dedicated to multi-room music.” I don’t know whether they think the delay getting from a iPhone’s home screen to the Sonos options is annoying (k, it is a little bit) or whether they fear your significant other will go for a jog and take the iTouch with her/him, leaving you controller-less (it could happen), but they definitely view a single-function controller as a boon.

I am sensing two takeaways: The first is that, since Sonos sells a lot of product at the custom-installer level, those installers need some cool upgrades to go and sell to rich people. God love ‘em for it, that’s fine. The other is that Sonos will spend more time on its potentially profitable CR200 than on its more populist iPhone app, and a divide may emerge.

So, Sonos: Please continue to support the free iPhone app, which makes your product line accessible to people on a budget, and we will continue to write up things like this leaked CR200, which may not be for everyone, but makes sense in some cases. [Yanked Sonos Product Page via Engadget]

Comments (AU Comments | US Comments)

  • fellersmtc

    I agree with Sonos. I think a dedicated remote is better than an iPhone app - for the reasons you state. But only for people who have the money, or have 230Gigs of music on their computer.

    I'd also would like to see the dock options. The CR-100 is cool because it sits in its dock, which is mounted on the wall. Try doing that with an iPHone (and having it stay there)

    fellersmtc

  • darngooddesign

    @CustomFirmware: Guess they were too sub-tal for you.

    darngooddesign

  • World iS Mi iPhone!!

    @LPAkira: I Can Haz 64GB?

  • roflwaffles is terribly unfunny

    Maybe because it works better than the ipod touch?
    Maaaaybe?

  • roflwaffles is terribly unfunny

    @LPAkira:
    A 64 GB ipod touch?
    neat.

  • ten10

    Looks more Zune-ish. Why not pretty nice for not being an Zune?

    btw that's one huge brick.

    ten10

  • CustomFirmware

    So anything with a touchscreen is pretty nice for not being an iPhone? Go figure Gizmodo.

    Also, the price on that thing is ridiculous.

  • fryhole

    @LPAkira: (they don't make those)

    fryhole

  • LPAkira

    Why in the world would anyone buy this? It is a $350 remote control. That is almost as much as a 64 gig iPod Touch.

    LPAkira

  • chefgon

    It costs MORE than it would cost to buy an iPod touch exclusively to use as a remote? I can totally see the point in having a high-end dedicated remote, and I'd probably rather have that than running a program on my phone to do it, but this is just too expensive to be realistic.

    chefgon

  • Nick2

    @chefgon: Bill gates has the no apple rule. Perhaps this is for the MS execs?

    Nick2

Post Your Comments

Got something to say? There are two ways to comment:

1. Guests

Click here to comment instantly.

2. Facebook Users

Click below to comment using your Facebook account.

We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial or highly amusing. If your comments are excessively self-promotional, obnoxious, or even worse, boring, you will be banned from commenting. All comments are moderated.