Comments on: Entertainment Geekly: My Bloody Valentine 3D Blu-ray Review

By: brian renn

brian renn — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:53:17 +0000

regardless of what technology may or may not work together this film sucked ass! the 3-d nightmare on elm street was better. i’m pissed i spent the money for the 3-d version and it is to late to take it back. if i wanted a headache i could have turned the radio on for free!

By: gas safety london

gas safety london — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:13:41 +0000

3D will take off in the next few years when the new screens are available to buy. If you see 3D in the cinema it is a mazing, this is coming soon to homes.

By: Namarrgon

Namarrgon — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:45:44 +0000

That’d be green/magenta, not red/green. But yeah, while anaglyph sucks, we won’t be seeing polarised glasses at home anytime soon. 120Hz displays, LCD shutter glasses and 3D-capable Blu-Ray players that connect the two are a lot more likely.

I don’t think full peripheral vision is a necessity. Nothing does that short of IMAX. More of a problem is focal disparity, where your eyes have to focus on your TV while simultaneously converging on a point at a different distance. Less of an issue when the screen is far away like in a cinema, but a real problem in the home.

By: JB

JB — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:28:10 +0000

Lets not overlook the fact that all of these “3D” techniques completely alienate people whose eyes, like mine, don’t focus on the same point. No amount of polarisation or multi-coloured lenses is going to fix that…