Beatles’ record producer and arranger George Martin—the Fifth Beatle—once said: “You’ve never really heard Sgt Pepper until you’ve heard it in mono.” As it turned out after hours of listening tests, it’s completely true.
The first article I ever got published was an opinion piece on Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. I was 16 at the time and, needless to say, quite naive. I wasn’t very much into non-Beatles music at that age, mainly because I didn’t have much access to it. It wasn’t until the next year that I was able to buy music regularly, having at last my own stereo system. But back then, my music world was all about the Beatles—and crap 90s radio pop. My dad had Sgt Pepper along with the rest of the Beatles’ records and some compilations of classic rock, from Chuck Berry to bloody Kansas, so that was my music world.
I couldn’t stop listening to Sgt Pepper. Non stop, I played it and played it until my ears bled and then I played it some more. It was the stereo version, not the mono mix, and it has lived with me ever since. Then, a few months ago I read in The Word—a very good British music magazine—that the Beatles in mono are—like George Martin implied—better than the Beatles in stereo. Apparently, the Beatles didn’t give a damn about the stereo mix, only about the mono. In fact, they cared so little that they passed on the stereo mixing sessions: Once the mono was done, they left the building.
So I started looking for them. Finding the actual mono mix in the market was impossible. Not to talk about the fact that I don’t have a turntable anymore. For some reason, the Beatles company didn’t have the mono mixes of the Beatles’ albums available either—they are going to re-release them now, it seems, remastered—so I got into Torrent to hunt them down. I couldn’t find them in the first try. I found a couple of MP3 rips, but I wanted to have FLAC rips of the original vinyls. After some time I gave up, forgetting about the mono Beatles until the Gizmodo’s audio week.
I thought trying it would be interesting for a feature, so I started looking for them again and got 192kbps MP3s, which I compared to the stereo version at the same bit rate. Since Sgt Pepper was my album, I started to listen to its songs in pairs, with my earmuff headphones on.
I was blown away. George Martin was oh so right: The songs do sound different. I was so surprised, that at the beginning I freaked out. “What? What? How? What the fuck?” was in my mind all the time.
When Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band came up, my first impression was that the sound had more thump than the stereo mix. A lot more thump, for a lack of a better word. It was like someone was beating me with a hammer. It was kind of noisy, but it filled my head and pushed me in a way the stereo version didn’t.
Then good old Ringo—my favourite Beatle—came up singing With A Little Help From My Friends. Same effect. It felt weird, but so much better. I kept coming back to the stereo versions for comparison and, before I noticed, I was thinking: “These sounds a lot weaker. These sound artificial.” Gone was the separation of instruments in the right and left channel too, which now feels so artificial. It was artificial, since stereo was a novelty back then: Most people still listened to music in mono and stereo was the “new thing.” As a result, producers overused it, just for the sake of it, like when 3D cinema came out and everything was an excuse to fire arrows and rocks and monsters at the public.
I definitely liked the way the mono version sounded—a lot more, even while I knew the stereo version till the last beat and note. LSD came up: same result. The sound is crisper and nearer. The bass a lot better. Again that special thump, even while this is such a delicate song. Getting Better gets better, and so does the rest, Fixing a Hole, She’s Leaving Home, Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite… I just couldn’t have enough.
But that wasn’t all. In the mono version you can hear stuff that is not in the stereo version. And not just bits, but quite a lot of things. Instruments, notes, even lyrics. Take the reprise version of Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band: It is full of shouting—Lennon going bananas at the end, and other bits at the beginning—that is not in the stereo mix.
Maybe it’s the novelty of listening to a “new” take on something that I know by heart, but I doubt it. As an experience, I like it a lot better. So much that I’m dying to get FLAC versions of good vinyl rips—or the remastered mono versions, as soon as they come out. And while your taste may be different, from now on this is the version I’m keeping in my iPod.
Listening Test: It’s music tech week at Gizmodo.


















Billo
Monday, April 20, 2009 at 6:33 AMYou Need to get MOST Sixties bands Albums in MONO, not just The Beatles !
The MONO versions of Albums by: Beatles, Stones, Shadows, Hollies, Kinks, Who, Bee Gees, Traffic, Beach Boys, Cream, Hendrix, Moody Blues, Ventures, etc are often very Different sounding…indeed some have actual DIFFERENT versions of songs or sound effects, instrumentation & vocal parts, etc…
The Beatles were not alone…or even FIRST either…in doing differing Mono to Stereo versions either !
Christina
Monday, April 20, 2009 at 8:36 AMOMG I WANT THE BEATLES IN MONO NOW!!!!
Mark
Monday, April 20, 2009 at 8:50 AMFINALLY, others are now getting around to discovering the mono mixes. Wait ’till you hear the White Album….and Revolver….and Rubber Soul….you’ll love ‘em. I was able to find the mono mixes on cd via Ebay. Rejoice Beatles fans, you are now going to hear the music as the Fabs themselves wanted it…in mono.
Clemenza
Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 12:33 AMTry the Dr Ebbetts remasters from the UK Mono versions, or better if you want the most high quality, the Dr Ebbetts remasters from the Red Wax Japanese vinyl edition. Rubber Soul and Sgt Pepper’s sounds great in the this Red Japanese; I prefer Revolver from the other source, UK Mono. There are several Flac versions available.
(Excuse my english)
Ed Sullivan
Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 2:21 AMShear absurdity. I had only heard “Peppers” in mono in ’67, and wasn’t really thrilled about the album, until a friend invited me to listen to it on his parents stereo. THAT’S when it blew me away!
If I want to listen to anything in mono, I can always flip a switch, but that would be like taking a shower with a raincoat on (or chopping one ear off).
Dan
Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 2:26 PMPrefer the mono to the stereo all you want, but stereo mixing is no more “artificial” than mono; both are merely different approximations of an ensemble in performance (which, by definition, can never be reproduced with perfect fidelity). In fact, an argument can be made that mono is the more “artificial” option, since people do in fact have two ears.
b
Wednesday, April 22, 2009 at 7:26 PMYou actually NEED the Mono versions as they often have considerable DIFFERENCES to Stereo…so just “Clicking over to Mono” is not any good !
Examples:
On “Revolver” there is extra backwards guitar on “I’m Only Sleeping”…”Yellow Submarine” has notable Mono/Stereo
differnces…including an extra line of Lennon’s “Captian impersonation” ! – while early copies in mono have a LONGER version of “Tomorrow Never Knows”…
On “Sgt.Pepper” their is Extra applause on the Reprise in Mono…extra guitar parts are noticeable too….on “White Album” there is a different version of “Don’t Pass Me By” in mono…
Early Cliff/Shadows album “Listen to Cliff” (1961) has a quite different version of the song “I Want You To Know” Stereo to Mono …some Shadows tracks differ too…
The Fourmost song “I Love You Too” on “Ferry Cross The Mersey” differs totally Mono to Stereo…
while The Hollies album “Butterfly” (1967) has very notable differnces Mono to Stereo,and their 1965 album track “Too Many People” has a closing sound effect in Mono absent in Stereo too…plus “Yes I Will” on “Hollies’ Greatest” (1968) differs totally Mono to Stereo.
The Zombies “Odyssey & Oracle” (1968) differs likewise…also The Bee Gees album “Idea” (1968)
On Cream’s “Disraeli Gears” (1967) the song “Dance The Night Away” has a differing mix in Mono….while Traffic’s album “Mr.Fantasy” (1967) has several Mono to Stereo differences…including a quite dfferent guitar solo on one track !
FAR more Studio time and care always went into the MONO Mixes…note many “mistakes” (“Please Please Me”, “If I Fell”, etc) still exist in Stereo that were CORRECTED in the Mono versions !!
So You really DO need ALL the original Mono versions !
Billo
Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 6:12 AMA key point to remember is that Producers, Recording Engineers and Artists Largely “worked IN MONO” in the sixties up to 1969.
Mono Mixes sounded Louder, and are often VERY much Sharper…
For Example “Yesterday” by The Beatles is more Dramatic in Mono with greater depth of sound, likewise Eleanor Rigby”.
in Mono the “One image” was sharp and if played on Stereo equipment you get a “Surround Sound” effect where the instruments all find their Natural place in the one overall sound (Hence EMI’s comment: “It will sound EVEN Better when Reproduced on Stereo Equipment…” on their post 1966 sixties UK Mono albums…)
Sixties Stereo mixes are often weaker in sound as the image is spread out across two channels…diluting the effect…plus often you got “Vocals one channel / Instruments the other” Basic twin channel stereo – A VERY False sound – Even John Lennon queried that !
George Harrison apparently only heard “Sgt Pepper” in Stereo
in the seventies…and was apparently very disappointed with the mix !
You sometimes get a lone bass guitar…or a harmonica etc DIVORCED from the rest of the instrumentation…and stuck on one channel…again a VERY False sound !
on come Cliff Richard & The Shadows tracks (“On The Beach” for example) Cliff has a WHOLE stereo Channel all to himself…while the FOUR Shadows instruments all squeeze up on the other !
Original sixties Mono singles by Beatles, Stones, Shadows, Hollies, Who, Cream etc….BLOW YOUR SPEAKERS APART power wise too !
Just Compare say “I’m A Boy” (The Who), “I Feel Free” (Cream) Mono Reaction singles to the Stereo album versions !
Two other notable variations….
On “Five faces of Manfred Mann” (1964), the Instrumental
“Mr.Anello” differs totally Mono to Stereo…and in Mono has a Guitar intro missing in Stereo, while on “Soul of Mann” (1967) Instrumentals album, the track “Why Should We Not” differs totally Mono to Stereo.
The Fourmost album track: “Some Kind of Wonderful” on their
“First & Fourmost” LP (1965) has a three times repeated vocal into in Mono…completely absent in Stereo.
Both Gerry & The Pacemakers and Freddie & The Dreamers albums differ Mono to Stereo too…
Idaho
Friday, May 1, 2009 at 2:17 PMI understand this Mono set will also include 1965 stereo versions of Help and Rubber Soul.
How will that be different from Help and Rubber Soul on the stereo sets? I understand the stereo sets do not include the 1965 stereo versions.
Idaho
Saturday, May 2, 2009 at 10:38 AMI have the Beatles EP set on CD. Its all mono.
hrm
Sunday, May 3, 2009 at 10:23 PMHrm, I dislike much of the Ebbetts mixes, as some of the stereo changeovers are too quick and things sound off if listening through headphones (especially bothered me on Rubber Soul). I guess I have to track down the mono (vinyl and cd) versions and compare!
idaho
Monday, May 4, 2009 at 1:32 AM“mono have a LONGER version of “Tomorrow Never Knows?”
I never knew that. I will buy the mono set anyhow.
Roze
Monday, January 4, 2010 at 4:43 PMWow, I wish I knew you during my early, lonely Beatlemania craze. I was 11 (’96)and back then all my Backstreet Boys 90s music pop friends think I’m a freak of nature listening nothing but The Beatles and Elvis Presley.
Never crossed my mind on mono/stereo mixes until a few years back. For all I know, growing with an old stereo set, I enjoy singing along “When I’m sixty four” by muting separate channels, listening to Paul’s vocal and the instrument on the other end.
Just compared the difference on mono/stereo and you’re right. It does sound different, clearer and much ‘closer’. Will add the mono version to my collection soon. Awesome article buddy! ;)