Comments on: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Nikon D700 Review Shoot-Out

By: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Nikon D700 Review Shoot-Out | Gizmodo Australia | DSLR cinema

Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:48:02 +0000

[...] it’s different class camera. Permalink Reply. Frank Read more from the original source: Canon 5D Mark II vs. Nikon D700 Review Shoot-Out | Gizmodo Australia Share and [...]

By: Graeme

Graeme — Sun, 31 May 2009 21:47:34 +0000

Am sure the Canon is a fantastic camera but based on your ISO 6400 shots above, the D700 renders the better pic. It is crisper with better background detail although underexposed relative to the Canon. Not sure where the Canon’s megapixel advantage has gone as its not evident here. If I needed to use one of these pics, it would be the D700

By: Frank

Frank — Mon, 04 May 2009 04:24:19 +0000

Bought the 5D Mark II this week and did some shooting. Last camera was a Canon 30D. I am ~very~ satisfied with the images I’m getting. The autofocus is plenty fast. 4FPS is good enough for anyone. If you have a bag full of Canon lenses, don’t go selling them to buy a Nikon… because the 5D2 is a fantastic creative tool to say the least…

By: Dolman

Dolman — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:33:20 +0000

I think 5d MKII is far much better than d700 it’s different class camera

By: Stylus

Stylus — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:15:20 +0000

It's a shame that the 24-120mm sucks so hard, almost as if it was designed to be crappy.

Also, you forgot to mention that the D700's flash can be used as a Master to trigger a Slave external flash.