<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Embarrasses Itself with Five Idiotic Predictions for the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:26:16 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: garglebutt</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13502</link>
		<dc:creator>garglebutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ibm_embarrasses_itself_with_five_idiotic_predictions_for_the_future-2.html#comment-13502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, not a particularly good critique.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Solar tech will skyrocket in the next few years when thin film hits the market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;DNA analysis is quite realistic since it is already available so the only change is mass market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &quot;talk to the web&quot; prediction relates to voice interfaces and natural language processing. I don&#039;t doubt this will see good progress in a limited context.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The digital shopping assistant is out of left field. Not going to defend that one. ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest stretch is context based memory. The storage and analytical requirements are theoretical now. I haven&#039;t seen anything to suggest the necessary natural language processing tech will be available. As a fan of Peter F Hamilton I wouldn&#039;t be unhappy though!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, not a particularly good critique.</p>
<p>Solar tech will skyrocket in the next few years when thin film hits the market.</p>
<p>DNA analysis is quite realistic since it is already available so the only change is mass market.</p>
<p>The &#8220;talk to the web&#8221; prediction relates to voice interfaces and natural language processing. I don&#8217;t doubt this will see good progress in a limited context.</p>
<p>The digital shopping assistant is out of left field. Not going to defend that one. ;)</p>
<p>The biggest stretch is context based memory. The storage and analytical requirements are theoretical now. I haven&#8217;t seen anything to suggest the necessary natural language processing tech will be available. As a fan of Peter F Hamilton I wouldn&#8217;t be unhappy though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
