Gadgets

IBM Embarrasses Itself with Five Idiotic Predictions for the Future

Posted by Adam Frucci at 2:30 AM on December 4, 2008

IBM has just released a list of five innovations it thinks we'll see in the next five years, and they're ridiculous. It's the kind of crap we laugh at when we see old Life magazine from the 40's predicting airship kitchens by the year 2000.


 

Here's the list:

-Energy saving solar technology printed and stuck onto asphalt, paint and windows
-A crystal ball to help you monitor health
-We will talk to the Web, and the Web will talk back
-We will have our own digital shopping assistants
-Forgetting will become a distant memory via smart appliances in every area of the home and office

Seriously, your big prediction for the next five years of technological innovation is talking internet? Are you fucking serious? Every single one of these predictions is laughable and idiotic. Seriously, a touchscreen in a dressing room to help you call someone to get you a different size is not an innovation, nor is it something that we will need to wait five years for. If that was a good idea, we'd have it now, but it's not, so we don't.

You would think that a company that exists in the tech sphere would have a clue about the types of short-term advances we can expect. Oh well, better go make some more unfunny ads to run incessantly during football games! [IBM via PSFK]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)

garglebutt

Posted December 4, 2008 5:53 PM

Hmm, not a particularly good critique.

Solar tech will skyrocket in the next few years when thin film hits the market.

DNA analysis is quite realistic since it is already available so the only change is mass market.

The "talk to the web" prediction relates to voice interfaces and natural language processing. I don't doubt this will see good progress in a limited context.

The digital shopping assistant is out of left field. Not going to defend that one. ;)

The biggest stretch is context based memory. The storage and analytical requirements are theoretical now. I haven't seen anything to suggest the necessary natural language processing tech will be available. As a fan of Peter F Hamilton I wouldn't be unhappy though!

Post Your Comment

Gizmodo Australia moderates comments to avoid spam and abuse. We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial and/or highly amusing. HTML is not accepted.

You must supply a name and your email address.