<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Street View Captures Man/Woman Peeing In the Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/google_street_view_captures_manwoman_peeing_in_the_street-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/google_street_view_captures_manwoman_peeing_in_the_street-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:23:20 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BigFan</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/google_street_view_captures_manwoman_peeing_in_the_street-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14143</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/google_street_view_captures_manwoman_peeing_in_the_street-2.html#comment-14143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ easy2panic: this is one of the biggest cases of useless intellectual snobbery i have ever seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;have you read 1984? don&#039;t even comment until you have&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
what? because someone hasn&#039;t read a book they can&#039;t comment on issues of cameras and privacy? i have read 1984, great, i now have orwell&#039;s liberalist views on privacy, goverment power, etc. it doesnt make me more qualified to comment on this topic, because in all seriousness, you don&#039;t need to read 1984 to come up with a view like, &#039;surveillance is bad&#039;. thats a view pushed in orwells 1984 (but that&#039;s his liberalist view), i&#039;m sure you&#039;ll find many many people who will argue that a limiting of personal liberty is fair if it provides greater security.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and these cameras don&#039;t come anywhere close to 1984 levels...google streetview should be viewed as an extension of conventional maps...everyone is all like &quot;ohhh shit, people can see the tree in my front yard!&gt;!?!?!&quot; yeh...a tree that anyone can see anyway. man up, seriously&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ easy2panic: this is one of the biggest cases of useless intellectual snobbery i have ever seen.<br />
&#8220;have you read 1984? don&#8217;t even comment until you have&#8221;<br />
what? because someone hasn&#8217;t read a book they can&#8217;t comment on issues of cameras and privacy? i have read 1984, great, i now have orwell&#8217;s liberalist views on privacy, goverment power, etc. it doesnt make me more qualified to comment on this topic, because in all seriousness, you don&#8217;t need to read 1984 to come up with a view like, &#8217;surveillance is bad&#8217;. thats a view pushed in orwells 1984 (but that&#8217;s his liberalist view), i&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find many many people who will argue that a limiting of personal liberty is fair if it provides greater security.</p>
<p>and these cameras don&#8217;t come anywhere close to 1984 levels&#8230;google streetview should be viewed as an extension of conventional maps&#8230;everyone is all like &#8220;ohhh shit, people can see the tree in my front yard!>!?!?!&#8221; yeh&#8230;a tree that anyone can see anyway. man up, seriously</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
