<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X Prize&#8217;s Call for Votes in Next Big Crazy Green Idea Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/x_prizes_call_for_votes_in_next_big_crazy_green_idea_challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/x_prizes_call_for_votes_in_next_big_crazy_green_idea_challenge/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:52:34 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fatherearth</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/x_prizes_call_for_votes_in_next_big_crazy_green_idea_challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>fatherearth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/x_prizes_call_for_votes_in_next_big_crazy_green_idea_challenge.html#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely agree with the last two posts.  The efficiency prize has its difficulties but it is the only way to go.  We need an immediate impact on reducing CO2 emissions to curb the effect of climate change.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other two prizes rely on new technologies that will take years to develop and mass-implement.  Energy efficiency is the only concept that can have an immediate impact...and we think the goals outlined in the video are too low.  10% energy reduction is too easy to meet and more than 10% of the population will participate if it is organized correctly with the proper incentives.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree with the last two posts.  The efficiency prize has its difficulties but it is the only way to go.  We need an immediate impact on reducing CO2 emissions to curb the effect of climate change.  </p>
<p>The other two prizes rely on new technologies that will take years to develop and mass-implement.  Energy efficiency is the only concept that can have an immediate impact&#8230;and we think the goals outlined in the video are too low.  10% energy reduction is too easy to meet and more than 10% of the population will participate if it is organized correctly with the proper incentives.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
