<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wii, PS3 and Xbox 360 Tested for XTREME Durability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:35:38 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saim</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13903</link>
		<dc:creator>Saim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2.html#comment-13903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They didn&#039;t break the 360. All they did was break the faceplate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They didn&#8217;t break the 360. All they did was break the faceplate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13902</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2.html#comment-13902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Beint that the wii has way less mass and technology i would say the ps3 was way more impressive. I have all three and am on my 5th 360.. i knew it wouldnt make it since it breaks easy just by playing it near a wall for to long&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beint that the wii has way less mass and technology i would say the ps3 was way more impressive. I have all three and am on my 5th 360.. i knew it wouldnt make it since it breaks easy just by playing it near a wall for to long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13901</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2.html#comment-13901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wii should have won, it took the beating better overall.&lt;br /&gt;
the PS3 was breaking apart from round 1....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wii should have won, it took the beating better overall.<br />
the PS3 was breaking apart from round 1&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13900</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/wii_ps3_and_xbox_360_tested_for_xtreme_durability-2.html#comment-13900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i think the wii should be the overall winner. the ps3 was tearing aprt on round 2. the wii just lost its lids. Wheres the dropping round like for the last gen durable test. 15 secs was a bunch  of shit aswell.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the wii should be the overall winner. the ps3 was tearing aprt on round 2. the wii just lost its lids. Wheres the dropping round like for the last gen durable test. 15 secs was a bunch  of shit aswell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
