We all know that the PS3 is built like a Navy battleship while the 360 can crumble in one’s hand like a wilted flower. But how do the Wii, PS3 and Xbox 360 stand up to one another when two dudes (and we use “dudes” here not because we’re stuck with dated lexicon but because we find it aptly descriptive) smash the living crap out of each machine? We won’t spoil it. [via PS3 Fanboy]
eric
Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 3:27 PMi think the wii should be the overall winner. the ps3 was tearing aprt on round 2. the wii just lost its lids. Wheres the dropping round like for the last gen durable test. 15 secs was a bunch of shit aswell.
RD
Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 9:00 PMWii should have won, it took the beating better overall.
the PS3 was breaking apart from round 1….
steve
Monday, November 17, 2008 at 8:55 AMBeint that the wii has way less mass and technology i would say the ps3 was way more impressive. I have all three and am on my 5th 360.. i knew it wouldnt make it since it breaks easy just by playing it near a wall for to long
Saim
Wednesday, December 24, 2008 at 8:20 PMThey didn’t break the 360. All they did was break the faceplate.