Entertainment
Terminator Salvation to Be Full of Gritty Mechas, Bikebots
Posted by Jesus Diaz at 12:20 AM on November 14, 2008
I don't know what to think about Terminator Salvation. I like the gritty decay in these leaked production concept illustrations as opposed to the shiny robots shown in the previous movies. But on the other side, it's like the producers took the look and feel of the Matrix, Transformers, and a John Romero zombies movie into a blender and said "push the button, Frank." Then again, I guess there's only one way to portray post-apocalyptical warfare machinery. This:
I'm amazed by the Harvesters, the giant mechas you can see next to the tiny T-600, which is a previous even more zombiesque version of Arnie's T-800. But "Mototerminator"? Hello? Does that mean there will also be Carterminators? iPodterminators? Ah, the wonderful world of the merchandising. Whatever they do, I hope they find some use for the secret kinetic rocket fire balls. [Filmonic via io9]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
Vid
Posted November 14, 2008 10:07 AM
Looks great, but there seems to be an issue with a lot of the links in todays posts - or is that just me? How come I never see half of the pictures in the posts on this site too? Fortunately Jesus' accounts are witty and entertaining enough that the odd missing jpeg is by-the-by.
Marco469
Posted November 14, 2008 10:41 AM
Star Wars, Alien, and Matrix, all showed us the thought of the old future. If people were running things, I would expect that. I'm not to sure a machine would allow the environment to fall apart like that. You would almose exepct there to be anti-static bags all over the place. Dirt, ash, oil, acid and water are all corrosive to metal. I think they would all keep themselves shiny and clean. Its self-preservation.
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 3:03 AM 14/11/08
@DeusExMach: That's why the machines in the Matrix did a much better job. They just decided to have swarms and swarms of killer robotic cephalopods. Inside their operating system however, things got a little corny.
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 3:02 AM 14/11/08
@iamnotafish: That's how it always was, even in the very first movie. Don't people remember the huge HK Taks roving along just shooting everything that moves? The entire franchise was littered with big bots.
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
tande04
Posted 3:00 AM 14/11/08
@stereobot: Well to be fair, there is no rating set yet. McG has said if it ends up being R it will be R though, there isn't supposedly pressure to make it PG-13.
tande04
beekerstudios
Posted 3:00 AM 14/11/08
Does anyone see the connection between this and the new RED camera's?
beekerstudios
DeusExMach
Posted 2:59 AM 14/11/08
Creativity never was Skynet's strong suit. From a purely logical standpoint, it kind of makes sense that in the early days of the war after judgment day, Skynet would just be refitting existing technology, while learning what does and does not work. That's how you go from Cy-Kill up there to the T-1000. Eventually, the Bi-pedal mech idea gets scrapped for tread-driven HK's.
DeusExMach
iamnotafish
Posted 2:58 AM 14/11/08
I kinda like them ... even if they're huge and imposing. Initially the Terminators were meant to infiltrate, but now they're just saying "screw this, DIE HUMANS!" and beating us into a pulp until Christian Batman saves us.
iamnotafish
stereobot
Posted 2:56 AM 14/11/08
McG is simply the director. If you want to blame someone for developing a movie around merchandising (rather than the other way around), then blame Halycon.
I think McG will put out a good product given what he has to work with.
But I agree the mototerminator is just a bit much, however I like the harvester and of course the T-600.
But if suckage is what you are all concerned about, just wait until you see the role of "Hybrids" in this movie.. they definitely don't belong in the Terminator Universe..
It doesn't matter anymore, the franchise was ruined with T3. T4 Salvation will be so far detached that its not even necessary to have seen T1 and T2 to see this movie, which is convenient considering those two films were "R" rated and this will be PG-13, you know, to appeal to the kids who are going to buy the toys...
stereobot
Herman
Posted 2:54 AM 14/11/08
Terminators would be better of if they were nanosize. Anyone read Michael Crichton's Prey?
Obviously that wouldn't allow for spectacular action but also the human race would be extinct within weeks, making these awful overpriced CG crapmovies unnecessary.
Anyway these robots were supposed to be intelligent. Sizing up doesn't seem like a smart decision.
Herman
Serolf Divad
Posted 2:54 AM 14/11/08
it's like the producers took the look and feel of the Matrix, Transformers, and a John Romero zombies movie into a blender and said "push the button, Frank."
And that's a bad thing... how exactly?
Serolf Divad
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 2:51 AM 14/11/08
@Jason:
Actually, in the original flicks, even the human-sized Terminators did not mix with human beings on the battle field. They were just bare skeletal robots with big laser rifles. They would only send like maybe one or 2 to infiltrate the human enclaves, but when it came to the full frontal battle, there was no need to play the subterfuge.
As for these bots, I'm actually curious to see how the motobots work in this movie. I saw a brief clip with them zipping around, but they look pretty useless and vulnerable compared to the other bots. I would've loved to see something like the HK Tank, but like a giant spider, or an aerial harvester of some sort.
But goddamn, McG? Ugh, I'm afraid I'll have to see this because I want to know how this crap ends and Christian Bale is a good actor, but....fuuuck. McG. :'(
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Bitstuff
Posted 2:50 AM 14/11/08
@Ibelieveinsandwitches: <3
Bitstuff
Zeuxis
Posted 2:49 AM 14/11/08
@geiko: @geiko:
geez are you always being such an ass? Why don't you piss off and go bother some other kids? My orginal comment was on topic while you just had to offend someone. Idiot.
Zeuxis
geiko
Posted 2:48 AM 14/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: It's the lack of an edit button, I tell ya. As soon as I reread my comment I said "I hope Kaiser doesn't show up to this thread and read it cause he'll point out it's stupidity." Sure enough, here we are twenty minutes later.
geiko
Ibelieveinsandwitches
Posted 2:46 AM 14/11/08
"push the button, Frank."
UH-OH! We've got movie sign!
Ibelieveinsandwitches
Jason
Posted 2:45 AM 14/11/08
@Saboth:
Exactly! What roads?!
I'm with you. A virus is the best way to terminate a lot of humans with little energy expense. A virus is the ultimate nanomachine.
Jason
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 2:45 AM 14/11/08
@Saboth: While I agree about the bikes, there's not going to be much in the movie if we take the purely extremely logical approach, since it would mean a quick death for everyone. It would be like that Mike Tyson fight all over again.
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 2:43 AM 14/11/08
@geiko: So I suppose we'll just call it Motorcross, Jetmotor, and so forth :P
Mototerminator sounds cooler
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Skiphex
Posted 2:43 AM 14/11/08
@Zeuxis:
I agree, this is going to suck as a movie. Yet another thriller filled more effects then content. Unless they have some good writers, they should just make a comic book and call it quits.
Skiphex
geiko
Posted 2:41 AM 14/11/08
@Zeuxis: Yes, precisely. I'm glad you understood today's lesson. Same time again tomorrow?
geiko
Zeuxis
Posted 2:40 AM 14/11/08
@geiko:
Then what was the point of your stupid comment? Ignorance is bliss.
Zeuxis
geiko
Posted 2:38 AM 14/11/08
@Zeuxis: How convenient, it's also my third language.
geiko
Jason
Posted 2:36 AM 14/11/08
OK, so terminators where humanoid so as to be able to mingle with humans nearly undetected.
How does a humanoid form the size of a building achieve that? It's RETARDED!
Shouldn't the "Harvesters" look like a building or a tree or a hill?
Don't even get me started on the motorcycle anachronisms.
McG is terminating Terminator.
Jason
Saboth
Posted 2:33 AM 14/11/08
You would think in the future, Skynet would have figured out that a swarm of airborne nanite robots that destroy people from the inside would be more efficient than building motorcycles. Honestly...motorcycles have trouble navigating 3 inch potholes, what are they going to do on the roads of the future, littered with bones and wreckage?
Saboth
Zeuxis
Posted 2:32 AM 14/11/08
@geiko:
English is my 3rd language, sorry mr. perfect, Im very sadden by your ignorance...
Zeuxis
geiko
Posted 2:30 AM 14/11/08
@Zeuxis: I'm very saddened by your grammar. What can we do?
geiko
DigitalSciGuy
Posted 2:29 AM 14/11/08
This is what the Borg should have looked like. :P
DigitalSciGuy
geiko
Posted 2:28 AM 14/11/08
I think you mean "motorminator" and "autorminator."
You're welcome!
geiko
Eauboy
Posted 2:28 AM 14/11/08
Is this what happened when we released too many silver nano particles into the environment?
Eauboy
Zeuxis
Posted 2:27 AM 14/11/08
damn, I hope this will not end up in the movie, I am soo looking forward to it, but the whole mecha and bike stuff is plain bull***t and IMO doesn't fit the orginal terminator universe. I be happy to see same stuff I saw in T1 during flashbacks, just with a good story, no frikkin transformers chasing John Connor...
I'm very sadden by those concepts :(
Zeuxis
dazman76
Posted 3:28 AM 14/11/08
Hmm, did John Romero make some zombie movies in-between Quake and Daikatana? :) Psst - I think you mean George Romero! :)
dazman76
Adisharr
Posted 3:27 AM 14/11/08
@undefined:@Zeuxis:
I agree - this just doesn't fit the Terminator universe. Moto-terminator? You've got to be kidding me.
Adisharr
Herman
Posted 3:26 AM 14/11/08
I don't @beekerstudios: I don't think the RED's are 15 times the size of a human.
That would make them pretty hard to handle.
Herman
borgseawolf
Posted 3:23 AM 14/11/08
@Jason: It transforms into Burj Dubai.
In fact, all of Dubai is being built by Skynet. Just wait until all these "skyscrapers" are finished...
borgseawolf
borgseawolf
Posted 3:22 AM 14/11/08
@Saboth: You realize that the humans in the movie need to stand a chance against the Skynet?
borgseawolf
Skiphex
Posted 3:18 AM 14/11/08
@tande04:
I'm not really sure what a "high end art flick" is, but I do know that T1-3 were at least entertaining and really cool at the time. I think if your going to progress a series that in all respects is fairly decent, don't mess it up with half-ass attempt to squeeze out some corny action figures.
Skiphex
tande04
Posted 3:11 AM 14/11/08
@Jason: Well The Road was supposed to be an influence.
Regardless, from a movie stand point lets weigh the two. Bikes gives us a chance to have a car chase which is an action movie staple, or nano virus where everyone dies in the first five minutes and we've got 1 hr 55 min to kill.
tande04
tande04
Posted 3:05 AM 14/11/08
@Skiphex: Come on. Did you think that T1-3 were some kind of high end art flick?
They were popcorn flicks, this is a popcorn flick. You're comparing apples to apples and coming out with orange juice.
tande04
Turkina
Posted 3:46 AM 14/11/08
@DeusExMach: Treaded/wheeled vehicles have problems when the height of the obstacle is taller than half the wheel/track size. A humanoid or otherwise legged machine (Terminator centaurs or bug-like machines would do well) are much better at weeding through a haystack of wreckage to get at the soft humans inside).
Giant mecha, as cool as it seems, is a big no-no. When you try and replace tanks with mecha, you introduce a big weakness: Legs with joints that are more easily disabled. Tanks can just pile on more armor and redundancy. Human-sized terminators are fine, since they are numerous enough to be expendable.
Turkina
tande04
Posted 4:17 AM 14/11/08
You can see them all in action here:
[io9.com]
tande04
Jeb_Hoge
Posted 4:15 AM 14/11/08
@DeusExMach: Can anyone name another surface vehicle that's capable of moving as fast and with as much manueverability as a motorcycle? Even the flying HKs never seemed that quick, so automating and arming big sportbike-like chassis seems to make sense in terms of a fast attack bot.
Jeb_Hoge
ripfire
Posted 4:14 AM 14/11/08
@Rabid Penguin: Built in navigation is a no-brainer.
"Approaching left turn... Turn left, DOOTdoot!"
ripfire
Rabid Penguin
Posted 4:12 AM 14/11/08
Think about it. There are probably a lot of smaller, more human-sized terminators. They can use vehicles in order to move from one place to another faster - enter mototerminator. Not only does it get good gas mileage, come equipped with XM satellite radio and Onstar, but also has a four star crash rating and the lowest cost of ownership in it's class... it also kills people mercilessly.
Rabid Penguin
ripfire
Posted 4:09 AM 14/11/08
The only mecha that's bothering me with this movie is the hype machine.
ripfire
Monty
Posted 4:03 AM 14/11/08
Could be worse. They might have used Robot Monster, High School Musical 3, and Santa Claus Conquers the Martians. Then again, that might actually be a good movie.
Monty
Hooray4Zoidberg
Posted 4:03 AM 14/11/08
@Serolf Divad: Becuse this is Terminator not transformers/matrix etc. It doesn't make sense to have spidery anime looking tentacle robots when the cool ass endoskelatons from the original movies would look much better and make a lot more sense in lieu of what we know from the first two movies.
And because this whole thing reeks of a bunch of suits sitting in a room trying to figure out what sells these days as oppossed to what makes the most sense in the context of the franchise and in the sake of continuity.
Hooray4Zoidberg
tande04
Posted 4:02 AM 14/11/08
@Skiphex: I don't know if that is the intent. I look at moto-terminators and say "Oh there is going to be a car chase" not, "oh that's going to be an action figure".
If it ends up being an R rated film I don't think you'll see a lot of kid based merchandising.
tande04
darthuv
Posted 4:00 AM 14/11/08
Seriously, consistency arguments. The tech of the Terminator universe has always changed with every movie, with only a hand full of highly identifiable hold-overs. As for borrowing from other movies and storylines, that too has been a staple of the Terminator franchise. I'm not knocking the franchise, I'm just calling like it is.
I myself am kinda excited for a full on mechtastic Terminator movie.
darthuv
Turbo Driver
Posted 4:43 AM 14/11/08
Countdown to OCC building a "terminator bike" just like these, in 3....2....1....
But can Mikey ride it?
Wolf
Turbo Driver
tande04
Posted 4:31 AM 14/11/08
Slight aside but I'm surprised that you and io9 still have these up. Most of the movie sites were told to pull them. Guess gawker flies under the radar for now.
tande04
Brodka
Posted 5:06 AM 14/11/08
Wait, we're concerned about believability? Didn't we have a liquid terminator that could reform after being shattered into a thousand pieces in T2? From a believability standpoint, this series jumped that mechanic shark a long time ago. I thought T3 was more "realist" in that it actually featured an actual robot.
And if Skynet really wanted to totally wipe us out (something the Matrix obviously did not want to do) they would do it with biological weapons. They certainly wouldn't do it by smashing everthing. They need infrastructure as much as we do.
Brodka
SomeAudioGuy
Posted 5:03 AM 14/11/08
@Hooray4Zoidberg:
"As you can see from this handy wall chart I had printed at Kinkos, the more 'badassness' we add to a film, the higher the potential profit margin is."
"Well this film could use at least 84 kilograms more 'badassness'. Add some motorcycles."
"Motorcycles... Yes. The fiercest killers in the automobile kingdom. I like it!"
SomeAudioGuy
darthuv
Posted 5:01 AM 14/11/08
@Monty: lol That reminds me it's almost time for me to dust off my copy of Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.
And after a year that saw aliens with Indy and a lackluster Clone Wars, isn't it about time for George to release the Star Wars Holiday Special on DVD?
darthuv
Killjoy
Posted 4:55 AM 14/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: Hello, Mototerminator!
Killjoy
spec24
Posted 4:53 AM 14/11/08
@Jason:
The terminators only came near the end of the war, not in the beginning. The terminators were a new breed of machine built to infiltrate.
spec24
TBM-Fan
Posted 4:52 AM 14/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: IF they bike are used for hit and run, speed and let terminators ride on them they are certainly weak but also powerfull fast and it can takes 2 terminators on it
TBM-Fan
Rabid Penguin
Posted 5:32 AM 14/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: Maybe the two terminators and the bike will combine to make Voltronterminator.
Rabid Penguin
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 5:28 AM 14/11/08
@TBM-Fan: I swear if I see two Terminators straddling a bikebot, I will chuckle, and then walk out.
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Skiphex
Posted 6:03 AM 14/11/08
@tande04: If it is R rated that may be true.
Skiphex
BigRocket
Posted 6:39 AM 14/11/08
For a second, I thought I was looking at shots from The Matrix. Glad to know that this is TOTALLY different.
BigRocket
Ben Zvan
Posted 6:57 AM 14/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: Not to mention it's what the concept art has printed on it...
Ben Zvan
serpicowasright
Posted 7:38 AM 14/11/08
@iamnotafish:
Technically this movie takes place before the battles that you see in T1 and T2. Hence the T600 being hulky and not in line with the smaller more suitable T800.
serpicowasright
GenericWhiteGuy
Posted 7:20 AM 14/11/08
There's a serious lack of shiny chrome surfaces here. I always thought Skynet just had a severe case of electronic OCD. It must have spent much of its day obsessively polishing its killbots to get that see-your-face-in-your-killer-shine.... The rest of the day was devoted to destroying those filthy, dirty humans.
GenericWhiteGuy
agentUrge
Posted 8:23 AM 14/11/08
@Ibelieveinsandwitches:
Cambot, give me rocket no. 9!!!!
agentUrge
Turkina
Posted 8:21 AM 14/11/08
@Jeb_Hoge: Big problem. Bike must be facing target to fire guns, it seems. Everything else has a turret or torso to increase firing arc.
Turkina
ViolenceMan
Posted 10:58 AM 14/11/08
@ripfire: I see what you did there...
ViolenceMan
MargueriteProtesilaus
Posted 4:23 AM 14/11/08
it does not make sense for the ultimate AI to come up with the things shown in the above pics, I had thought that the T-1000 was the optimal final design until the TX came out. then it made sense that the TX was the "optimal" design. why take it any further. plus the TX did not require the bulky old tech actuators as shown in the funny thing above. I have a feeling the movie is going to be pretty lame, Instead of re-inventing what Americans think the ultimate death machine should be, they should have focussed more on the sotry/plot and used what worked in the past. we'll see how it goes. Dcook
MargueriteProtesilaus
takeshi
Posted 3:43 AM 15/11/08
@ripfire: The typical whiney prejudiced geek fanboy backlash is all that's bothering me...
takeshi
takeshi
Posted 3:42 AM 15/11/08
@darthuv: C'mon. You know anything that wasn't in the first movie isn't allowed in any sequels. That means all actors have to have bad 80's haircuts.
takeshi
takeshi
Posted 3:39 AM 15/11/08
@Jason: You must have slept through the original movie. There were plenty of large machines and not just the human impersonating terminators.
takeshi