Weapons
Rocket Grenade Smashed to Bits In Flight By Quick Kill Defence System
Posted by Kit Eaton at 9:37 PM on November 21, 2008
We've written about the sci-fi sounding Army's Future Combat System before, but the Army's just demonstrated a successful test of one of its components: the Quick Kill vehicle defence system. Check it out: the Raytheon system uses an electronically-scanned radar array to detect an incoming anti-tank rocket-propelled grenade, then vertically launches a countermeasure missile that blows the round to smithereens in mid-flight, saving the RPG's intended target. It's a very simple test setup, and, of course the real system will have to deal with complications like vehicles in motion, but it's an important first step. And it goes boom. [Danger Room]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
MadMonkey572
Posted 11:33 PM 21/11/08
Oh my... that is AWESOME.
MadMonkey572
ypctx
Posted 11:32 PM 21/11/08
video cool, yeah.
but what if multiple mortars are fired at once? which is logical the enemy will do once they have knowledge about this system.
i want lasers.
ypctx
ajh0914
Posted 11:18 PM 21/11/08
that just made my fucking morning... that thing is amazing
ajh0914
Neverhitboxes
Posted 11:15 PM 21/11/08
The video was fucking awesome.
Neverhitboxes
Cisco-Kid
Posted 11:58 PM 21/11/08
Phase two of the system fires a second rocket at the origination of the RPG, killing the shooter.
Phase three goes after his family.
Cisco-Kid
LoganSix
Posted 11:52 PM 21/11/08
I would hate to be on the wall when the shock wave hits. Yikes!
Or in the street in front of the wall.
LoganSix
Erwos
Posted 11:49 PM 21/11/08
@ypctx: They'll just fire multiple missiles. My _guess_ is that they'll implement this system on a robotic, self-propelled platform that integrates the missiles and radar into one unit - possibly with secondary units that are just missiles and slaved into the primary unit's radar (maybe with some sort of provision for primary-failover). IIRC, the Patriot works something like that.
It just boggles my mind that people would look at this video, say "what about multiple incoming rounds", and think that they've found the fatal flaw. Defense contractors are greedy, but they're not dumb.
Erwos
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 12:16 AM 22/11/08
@MartinX: The guy who names it should watch Spaceballs.
+ Watch video
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
weatherman
Posted 12:14 AM 22/11/08
I'm no weapons engineer, but this does seem a little complicated for deployment. The timing issue is a big one - it'll work with plenty of time for detecting and acquiring the target, but in close quarters combat it would seem to inherently take too long to launch; shoot up, correct down, launch forward, explode... just too much could go wrong, especially in a combat situation.
Wasn't there another system that is already deployed - a kind of "active armor" that essentially just explodes outwards before the RPG hits? That seems like it would work more reliably in all situations. Maybe it's not as effective though. That test sure made this thing look effective!
weatherman
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 12:12 AM 22/11/08
@Cisco-Kid: It then bankrupts his brothers tractor dealership.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
weatherman
Posted 12:10 AM 22/11/08
@Cisco-Kid: phase four, conceived by Dick Cheney, goes after a guy in another country who kinda reminds us of the shooter in some way because he looked at us cross-eyed once.
Sorry, it's reflexive at this point. Thank goodness I don't have to keep that up for another four years...
weatherman
MartinX
Posted 12:05 AM 22/11/08
That's pretty cool.
I wonder, however, if, when it's deployed, it will still be called the "Future Combat System"?
Surely "Present Combat System" would be more appropriate at that point, but it doesn't sound as good.
Possibly they will need to give it a new name, like BANGWHAMMER or something, then the can figure out words to make that into an acronym.
I guess that's what the DoDs highly trained reverse acronym department (R.A.D) is paid to figure out.
MartinX
dandaman247
Posted 12:37 AM 22/11/08
Still seems like it would do a lot of damage to the soldiers who happen to be near it...
:\
What about using a laser instead??
dandaman247
nuclearlove
Posted 12:37 AM 22/11/08
I call shenanigans on this.
nuclearlove
Curves
Posted 12:30 AM 22/11/08
The best defense is a good offense. They should have named this porcupine, since that is what it puts me in the mind of. (OK, so maybe I need more coffee, but thats what it reminded me of.)
Curves
scarbrtj
Posted 12:20 AM 22/11/08
If Matthew "Pecker" McConaughey can toss a TiVo in the path of an RPG...
then I woulda predicted that Raytheon would have no problem.
scarbrtj
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 12:20 AM 22/11/08
@weatherman: Did you see then end of the video when they did it real time? It took less than a second for the RPG to fire and the system to explode it. As for something going wrong, if you didn't have the system, you'd be defenseless. Even if it stops the RPG 50% of the time, that's still more than no system.
I think you are thinking of reactive armor that tanks use. IIRC, it doesn't detect the inbound round, but reacts when the round imapacts it.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
MartinX
Posted 12:20 AM 22/11/08
@ypctx: It looks like it doesn't actually hit the incoming projectile, it appears to just point itself in the right direction and explode like a big shotgun-blast filling the area infront of it with "Flak" for lack of a better description.
I guess multiple projectiles fired at close to the same time would all be caught in the same blast, and if they were further apart it would just fire another one.
Set up multiple batteries that only focus on set vectors/quadrants and you'd have a pretty good system.
Plus of course you also know exactly what direction the projectile came from, so whoever fired it is basically toast.
MartinX
TerryinSt.Paul
Posted 12:53 AM 22/11/08
@russdanger:
Alot less than Randy Johnson.
+ Watch video
TerryinSt.Paul
Nikkoli
Posted 12:50 AM 22/11/08
@dandaman247: Because the only lasers that generate enough heat to blow it up in that short of a time a much bigger than this system, and have very sensitive optic systems that would fail in a dusty condition like this. Lasers will eventually be the right choice in the future, but the technology still isn't there
P.S. I know you can get flashlight size green lasers that are stable and will burn through things, but the heat buildup takes a couple seconds and I imagine this rocket is blowing something up within 500ms of when it detects it.
Nikkoli
Nikkoli
Posted 12:43 AM 22/11/08
@LoganSix: Yeah, but the alternative is much worse, and probably much more permanent.
Nikkoli
russdanger
Posted 12:40 AM 22/11/08
I wonder how many low-flying birds have gotten blown to nirvana by this thing so far.
russdanger
weatherman
Posted 12:40 AM 22/11/08
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: yeah, you're right. I looked at it and it definitely happens really quick. Actually a heck of a lot quicker than 1 second. And if it works in combat situations, I'm all for it. More protection is more protection, after all, and we definitely need something better than the chicken wire we're using against RPGs.
weatherman
Serpent2
Posted 1:09 AM 22/11/08
I cant see the video from work but is this the same as the isrial company that makes the trophy system? I heard the concept was great but in practice it didn't work to well.. of course that was a while ago.. so plenty of time to fix bugs
Serpent2
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 1:07 AM 22/11/08
@weatherman: I had to watch the end a couple of times b/c I didn't understand what they were showing. The slow mo just makes it seem like what was at the end couldn;t have been what happened it was so quick, especially with the direction changes. This reminds me of a system I saw for the President which is in essence a kevlar airbag wall. If it detects a gunshot or incoming round, it inflates a vertical wall to catch the bullet. It's a stationary unit, but they said it could be used along common paths the President walk and at events.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
b-radicate
Posted 1:05 AM 22/11/08
@weatherman: I wonder what'll happen if the RPG comes from another angle. Are there corrective rockets on all sides of the thing? How would it correct in another direction? Does its platform rotate super quick, too?
b-radicate
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 1:03 AM 22/11/08
@Curves: Excuse me, waitress, I think you may have given Curves decaf. Can she have another cup please? :)
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
b-radicate
Posted 1:03 AM 22/11/08
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: God, I would hate to lean against THAT tank.
b-radicate
Curves
Posted 1:00 AM 22/11/08
@TerryinSt.Paul: Was that ruled a Fowl ball?
Curves
Kaspir
Posted 1:38 AM 22/11/08
I pity the first kid that throws a good sized rock at one of our vehicles outfitted with this system, it will be a bad day for him indeed...
Kaspir
Barry99705
Posted 1:28 AM 22/11/08
@russdanger: I'm sure it can tell the difference between a high speed target, and a slow flying bird.
Barry99705
Woden501
Posted 1:20 AM 22/11/08
One step closer to having ourselves some Bolos.
Woden501
khamer
Posted 1:49 AM 22/11/08
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: And steals his diamond necklace collection.
khamer
Gann
Posted 2:06 AM 22/11/08
I want to set one of these up to scare the piss out of the paperboy.
Gann
LoringGalung
Posted 2:00 AM 22/11/08
@Erwos: Actually there is a fatal flaw in active defense systems, a dummy rocket sent in front of the real rocket fools the system at least it does for current tank active protection system. Look for Bazalt RPG30, from Russia with love. What boggles my mind is the abysmal quantity of resources humanity is spending on way to kill themselves. Apparently this will make a dent in our selfish mentality only when mushroom clouds will light up our children playground.
LoringGalung
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 2:37 AM 22/11/08
@Kaspir: If that kid can throw as fast as an RPG, I think there are many a MLB team who would bring him, his family, AND his village over to the US in about three seconds.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 2:36 AM 22/11/08
@Barry99705: I don't know. An unladen swallow can fly pretty fast.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
secretmanofagent
Posted 2:41 AM 22/11/08
Does it work on pigeons?
secretmanofagent
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 2:41 AM 22/11/08
@b-radicate: It appears to fire straight up, then adjusts towards the target, so it might just be 360 degree.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
nospamsam
Posted 3:17 AM 22/11/08
wow, very nice.
I love a good defensive weapon system.
nospamsam
Toshie
Posted 3:36 AM 22/11/08
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: European or African?
Toshie
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 3:36 AM 22/11/08
@godwhacker: After it finishes it's smoke and nap, pretty quick.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Toshie
Posted 3:33 AM 22/11/08
@MartinX: Of course by 'BANGWHAMMER' I mean my penis.
Toshie
godwhacker
Posted 3:29 AM 22/11/08
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★:
so, how fast can it fly after it has been laden?
godwhacker
borgseawolf
Posted 3:56 AM 22/11/08
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: If this works on detecting missiles of certain speed only, I predict Dune-style 'slow bullet' weapons being developed as counter-measure.
borgseawolf
BoinK
Posted 3:55 AM 22/11/08
@Serpent2: That's the first thing I thought about as well.
+ Watch video
BoinK
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
Posted 3:59 AM 22/11/08
@borgseawolf: The slow blade penetrates, eh?
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★
justhesh
Posted 4:54 AM 22/11/08
I'm not normally a fan of military tech, as it's usually weapons meant to kill. But given that this is meant for defense...and is also FUCKING BADASS, then I'll make an exception and approve entirely.
God, that was awesome.
justhesh
aetheria
Posted 4:47 AM 22/11/08
@weatherman: you're thinking of ablative armor. I think it works ok, but it's only effective once. re: up-close combat - generally speaking, with RPG attacks, you want to be standing CLEAR of the blast radius, so you're probably not standing right next to the vehicle you're attacking when you let one off. Unless you're just doing the suicide thing, in which case you're probably just strapping one on and saving the whole "rocket" part for some of your less-explodey-prone peeps who have more use for rockets than you.
I'm wondering what the explosive effect is on friendlies standing next to the protected vehicle? I'd like to see this video again, please, with a dead chicken or a rack of lamb or something in front of the wall, so we can see what happens to meat when this thing goes off, SRL style.
aetheria
obeisance
Posted 4:43 AM 22/11/08
@Kaspir: Radar determines speed and size of the incoming projectile. Birds and thrown rocks aren't going to trigger it.
obeisance
ZukeZuke
Posted 4:39 AM 22/11/08
There's no shenanigans here.
From the Patriot missile to ECMs, Raytheon builds some amazing sci-fi shit that is deployed in the real world. I used to work in one of their mfg plants and the technology would blow your mind!
ZukeZuke
ShradhdhaGebsite
Posted 5:10 AM 22/11/08
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14686871/ Isrealis already had this developed for years now and by the looks of the U.S. copy, Isreal still did it better
ShradhdhaGebsite
CharmPeddler
Posted 5:04 AM 22/11/08
"All your BASE r Blong to U... shit what the EFF was that?"
CharmPeddler
bookishboy
Posted 5:25 AM 22/11/08
Holy crap, this will certainly show those enemies who would shoot a RPG at our vehicles.
Until they decide to one-up us by shooting 2 RPG's.
bookishboy
DeusExMach
Posted 7:35 AM 22/11/08
@bookishboy: Yeah, we'd need, like... TWO of the defense platforms.
DeusExMach
DeusExMach
Posted 7:33 AM 22/11/08
@Gann: "I want my Two dollars!" *K-thwakka-BOOM*
DeusExMach
DeusExMach
Posted 7:28 AM 22/11/08
@Toshie: The whole point of the system is to block incoming phallic-shaped objects. So WangBammer would be more accurate in your case...
Or Cockblocker?
...Stiffstopper?
the Trojan-X42?
DeusExMach
DeusExMach
Posted 7:25 AM 22/11/08
@khamer: and sleeps with his wife, kicks his dog, and insults his mother.
DeusExMach
DeusExMach
Posted 7:24 AM 22/11/08
@LoganSix: Yeah, Barotrauma is not all that great an option compared to frag-damage...
DeusExMach
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Posted 7:53 AM 22/11/08
@bookishboy: You should call Raytheon. I'll bet nobody there was smart enough to even THINK of that.
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Posted 7:52 AM 22/11/08
@DeusExMach: Or one platform with TWO missiles.
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Posted 7:51 AM 22/11/08
@justhesh: I'm so relieved. I was so hoping you'd approve.
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
Posted 7:47 AM 22/11/08
@Curves: It's apt.
Comrade GadgetPlay, Fellow Traveler
unspellable
Posted 7:44 AM 22/11/08
@Cisco-Kid: Wow, those 3 comments just wasted my time.
unspellable
Toshie
Posted 8:03 AM 22/11/08
@DeusExMach: Hmm, hadn't thought about the military trying to shoot down my penis (thanks for tonight's nightmare though).
I was making reference to Dr. Horrible, but now I feel compelled to seek out some type of kevlar cup... :-(
Toshie
Strife56
Posted 9:27 AM 22/11/08
KAME... HAME... HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Strife56
Mecharine
Posted 10:31 AM 22/11/08
This reminds me of various anime that have "Itano Circus" missile swarms. The missiles move around just like the missile in the video. Imagine that! We're one step closer to creating a VF-1 Valkyrie with real swarming micro-missiles!
Mecharine
ianovich
Posted 10:30 AM 22/11/08
At 00:27 you can see the RPG's shaped charge detonate. It is the yellow streak that lances from right to left across the bottom half of the frame. It's probably less destructive than a direct hit, but that could still ruin your day.
This system is definitely the shit, but that test took place over a year ago. Look at the approved for public release date at the beginning. Which makes it all the more strange that it is number 8 on Time magazine's best inventions of 2008.
ianovich
banmojo
Posted 5:23 PM 22/11/08
I really like how the 'enemy' missile deploys itself to begin with, f$#@ing cool shit.
banmojo
banmojo
Posted 5:22 PM 22/11/08
@Curves: maybe you just have lots of little pricks on your mind ;^)
oh, come on, you mentioned porcupines, I link that to 'little pricks', it's f4#@ing COMEDY!!
ok, ok, I'll TFSU already, geez
banmojo
ianovich
Posted 8:01 PM 22/11/08
@Woden501: Yes! I hope Raytheon works on developing Hellbores next.
ianovich
Bloodboiler
Posted 1:21 AM 23/11/08
They should call it Death Rights Management system. After years of development and invested billions, it will take about 3 days for the opposing side to develop a free countermeasure.
Bloodboiler
USB_Humping_Dog
Posted 8:10 AM 23/11/08
Kinda like CIWS, innit?
USB_Humping_Dog
USB_Humping_Dog
Posted 8:10 AM 23/11/08
@Mecharine: I'd rather have funnels.
USB_Humping_Dog
Crimson (PS3 ID Black--Tiger)
Posted 6:09 AM 24/11/08
Honestly, I imagine that compared to what the RPG would do both to the vehicle and the surroundings if it hit, that shockwave is probably the lesser of two evils.
Crimson (PS3 ID Black--Tiger)