Gadgets
Review: Sony's Complete Bravia Link Home Theatre System
Posted by Mark Wilson at 2:01 AM on November 18, 2008

While many of us have our collection of nice electronic toys, most of us can't afford to walk into a store, take a look at a company like Sony's complete line of Bravia media equipment and walk out with it all. And your conscience might stop you anyway—even if your wallet could take the hit, you know enough to look around at other respectable brands, maybe some Samsung or LG equipment, and make a more informed decision.
Well today we're taking the role of "that guy" for you. Sony shipped us their latest Bravia LCD TV along with all of its modular Link components: a wireless HDMI streamer, their internet video player, an HDMI port expander and an extra slim DVD player—a set of matching electronics designed to hook nicely to the back of your Bravia TV while integrating with the display at a software level.
Setting Up
After fervently unpacking five cardboard boxes and dusting the styrofoam specs off of the jet black components, I remembered just how nice Sony's equipment can be. Everything feels solid in the hands, everything matches with the same amount of gloss and everything has the shining Sony logo that was the beacon for technological enlightenment to anyone who lived through the 80s.
But I am disappointed.
I know that most all of this stuff is supposed to hook right to the back of the television, yet I have no natural inclination as to how that happens. I see screws, flimsy clear plastic tracks and manuals in three different languages. I swallow my pride and open one up (and it's a good thing I did).
Starting with the DVD player, I learned that one must screw a mount into the television, screw the component into the mount and then make sure to plug in the three or more cords to make it work.

What? This isn't what I pictured at all. I wanted to equip this TV like a fucking gun. I wanted to lock and load, hear the fulfilling clank of metal on metal and live a Rambo montage while I prepped for an onslaught of 1080p. Instead, I was fiddling with screws and wires, scratching up my entertainment stand in a precarious position while making my sleek beautiful new TV resemble the trash bin of a wire factory.
The feeling was akin to any time you've bought cereal for the toy, only to realise that the toy was really just a 2-cent piece of rubber. And by the way, that box of cereal just cost you $US3,500.
Bravia Internet Video Link - $US300
The Bravia Internet Video Link was maybe the most indulgent component I had to test, mostly because I would personally never purchase this component on my own. Why?
1. It's essentially a box that puts streaming video like YouTube onto your TV (which is done by many other components as a second function) and
2. It works exclusively with Bravia TVs. The Internet Video Link uses the television's DMXe (USB) port and fits the content into the TV's XMB menu system.
Yet my alternate persona, my big spender identity who sucked down a $US5 iced coffee while writing this review, enjoyed the IVL.
It really is ingenious that the system works within the television's menu system. In fact, it doesn't even have a menu system of its own. Utilising the TV's XMB (Cross Media Bar), the interface is not so different than the PS3. Flipping through the list of content providers made way for a very intuitive experience in which I click any content provider that looks interesting, from AP to cooking classes. Once I select a clip from within their menu, fast forwarding through content or skipping ahead is extremely responsive with the user interface acknowledging my commands smoothly while allowing the clips time to buffer.
Sure, most of the content looks like crap, the compressed YouTube clips especially. But Sony's understated blue skin framed it well, adding a bit of class to often tacky content.
Especially with Amazon Unbox (tested in beta here), we see Sony's design touch can add a lot to the experience. While managing Unbox content is a pain on my TiVo, the Internet Link puts a pleasant icon skin on your media and has a multitude of simple to navigate categories that makes it all palatable. Plus, you get the same navigation bar in Unbox as you do in YouTube or any other of the services, simplifying the experience of viewing dozens of different content feeds. Simply, it's the best presentation of Unbox I've seen to date.
I'm happy again. The world is rainbows and sunshine.
Then the practical side of me kicks in. I spit out the Brazilian coffee (most of it gone by now, to be honest) and realise I've been hoodwinked. Why didn't the PS3 have all of these neat internet video channels in its XMB? I had no answer.
Bravia Wireless Link - $US800
Regardless of how things may have gone with the Internet Link, I was ready to move on to the Wireless Link. It's a piece of equipment that we all hope will be a mainstay in every home within 5 years. The system streams HDMI and component video wirelessly, allowing you to reroute that DVR to a different room while maintaining a pristine HD image.
I knew there would be catches. Even $US5 coffee guy could understand that the HD video would be limited to 1080i streaming, nixing the dream of watching Blu-rays in the bedroom. The second catch is even bigger. The Wireless Link transmitter does not double as an HDMI port splitter. This is a vital point, as it means that you can't double dip your home theatre to two televisions. Even if it's 1 foot away, the components plug in to the transmitter, and the receiver accepts the data wirelessly.
Combine no hardline output with the 1080i transfer limitations and you realise that all content you watch will all be in 1080i.
OK, but I'm still enthused. After all, I didn't pay for this stuff. So I put it through the most rigorous test I can imagine. I play the final levels of Gears of War 2, streaming my 720p component connection from my Xbox in my living room to my TV in my bedroom (sadly, a distance of only 10 or so feet). Still, the Wireless Link really impressed me.
There's no discernible lag. Maybe if I'd been playing online in some pro tournament, I'd have noticed a slight disadvantage. But as far as I could tell, the Xbox is hooked right into the TV I'm was using. And the image quality is just as good as it had looked when I had the system hardwired.
Sony explained later that the delay between the base station and a receiver was less than one millisecond—that's faster than most LCDs can draw the image being transmitted. Not bad, Sony. My 5GHz Wireless-N network didn't even interfere, as you'd warned me could happen.
But again, there's a catch where some engineer didn't think things through all the way. I couldn't stream my PS3 at all. Neither Blu-ray nor games worked, even when I reduced the resolution from 1080p. I could catch the signal for a moment or two, then the system would give me a "not supported" message.
Bravia DVD Player - $US200
Even my yuppie alter ego wasn't fooled by this one. The Bravia DVD Link may be called a link, but I know better. I know a DVD player when I see one.
Sony does promise a a few advantages with their Bravia branded item, of course. The first I discussed above, that the player could mount to the back of your set (be it in a not so glamorous way). The second is that, like the Internet Movie Link, the DVD component can hook to the television through the USB-based DMXe port.
Wait, I should rephrase this, the DVD Link needs to hook to the TV through DMXe. It won't work at all otherwise. And that's a problem, as the television only has one DMXe port.
So even though I have the HDMI hooked up correctly and even though I know most DVD players don't need USB connections to work, I am sitting here, pounding on the DVD remote that does nothing (yet, the DVD menu still auto-loads with "play movie" highlighted but unclickable, which just spites me more). The techie me is upset. The yuppie me is livid pissed.
To be fair, Sony reps believe I could daisy chain the DVD Link through the Internet Link. I had no success with this method, but maybe I'm just unlucky.
When the DVD Link is plugged in and working happily, it's fine. It's pretty much as good as any other DVD player. If you hit the "display" button on the remote, it tweaks your TV's display, as opposed to messing with DVD player options. I guess there's an advantage to this, a certain technological configuration efficiency. But the benefit is small, and to quote the words of my truly yuppie wife, "It doesn't even play Blu-ray??"
Input Link - $US150
The Input Link isn't the most glamorous of Bravia accessories, but like the others, it does hook to the back of your TV after a bit of effort. It's a 5X1 HDMI port expander. It matches the other Links. And it's a hugely missed opportunity by Sony if you think about it. A module like this could sync with DMXe and mount your components straight into the XMB through Sony technical magic. Instead, it just offers some extra HDMI slots. But of all the mounting components, the Input Link seemed the most at home, fitting snugly and solidly near the inputs.
So Is It Worth It?
To be fair to Sony, $US3,500 isn't an absurd amount to spend on home theatre equipment—especially when we break down the sheer amount of components we reviewed here and realise that it's all name brand equipment.
But I look at the pile of electronics I've got, this mountain of Bravia, and I can't help wishing it would do more or at least be a seamless experience to use.
I had more difficulty setting up the equipment than I have home theatre components in years. For each component being design around the television, it certainly didn't fit on the television very easily or even all that well.
And while Sony may or may not be on to something with their DMXe integration (I think they really could be, actually), they need to make sure that users who own more than one component—their most loyal customer base—aren't being punished for it by limiting available DMXe inputs on Bravia TVs.
The thing is, I really like the Bravia television, the use of XMB for its menu system and the idea of Sony's "Links" integrating with this very solid platform. And the Wireless Link, even at $US800, is technically impressive and genuinely excites me about the future of home theatre.
Yet at the end of the day, both my ignorant yuppie and shamelessly techie self can't help but to look at my PS3 and wonder, why oh why can't Sony focus all of their development into this machine—or at the very least, make using my TV as straightforward and gratifying as firing a loaded weapon?

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Mark Wilson
Posted 4:48 AM 18/11/08
@DownfieldComa: I'm pretty sure there's a remote for each component but...errr...I may have lost one for the shot.
The remotes do work with the TV out of the box, but not necessarily the other components without programming. And of course they work with the TV because, at least with the USB components, I believe the TV is actually controlling the peripheral.
Mark Wilson
DownfieldComa
Posted 4:44 AM 18/11/08
Great review.
Question, I see three remotes, if those were the only ones, did those three work out of the box with all the components? Or if there were more remotes, were there some that didn't work with other components?
DownfieldComa
DownfieldComa
Posted 4:40 AM 18/11/08
@Ibelieveinsandwitches: Absolutely, as I was reading this article, one side of me was in awe that a company wouldn't make everything work well together and seemlessly hook up when you hook it up. The other side of me was thinking, "it is Sony"
DownfieldComa
maxentropy
Posted 4:38 AM 18/11/08
@daftrok: Yes, one device makes the most sense.
maxentropy
deadhouseplantz
Posted 4:37 AM 18/11/08
I'm confused, maybe you guys can help. I can't help but wonder... is Sony trying to be more like Apple, or is Apple trying to be more like Sony?
I mean, both care more about aesthetics over function.
The things they use to be good at, they no longer are. Apple use to make the best and innovative computers, now, they don't. While Sony use to be an electronic juggernaut, that has now lost a lot of steam to Samsung and smaller firms.
The most important comparison, they both display new items with features that obviously ignore the wants of their loyal consumers. Yes, people really want to stream their DVD's from downstairs to their bedroom, almost as much as iPhone uses love to retype all of their text in lieu of cut and paste.
Note: I'm typing this on the SONY VAIO VGX-TP20E/W HTPC, so no bias here.
deadhouseplantz
ninjagin
Posted 4:33 AM 18/11/08
This was a great read. I'm not a Sony fan by any stretch (too many bad experiences), but I was eager to know how they went about the integration challenge and how successful it would be. Thanks for the story. Now I'm kind of interested in seeing a similar review of competing offerings.
ninjagin
Ruho
Posted 4:32 AM 18/11/08
Good review btw Mr. Wilson!
Ruho
RobLikesbrunch
Posted 4:30 AM 18/11/08
@vivek: @daftrok:
Agreed- the PS3 can do all of that except for the flawed HD streaming.
I also don't understand the Video Link.....who would possibly buy that instead of an Apple TV?
RobLikesbrunch
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-->
Posted 4:30 AM 18/11/08
@Cordfucious v 2.0.1: It's the BanHammerator and Disemvowelatron.
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-->
Ibelieveinsandwitches
Posted 4:29 AM 18/11/08
great article.
doesn't really make sense for Sony to make all of these components only to not have them work together. But then again doing things like that is what Sony is famous for.
Ibelieveinsandwitches
RacecarBoobTat
Posted 4:26 AM 18/11/08
Can you not stick a 4-port USB adapter onto the one USB port?
RacecarBoobTat
Cordfucious v 2.0.1
Posted 4:25 AM 18/11/08
@2ndBase: +1 Seriously... where is the hammer or the disemvowelator
Cordfucious v 2.0.1
2ndBase
Posted 4:20 AM 18/11/08
@vivek: This crap is getting ridiculous. Can we do something about this already?
2ndBase
Ruho
Posted 4:19 AM 18/11/08
I ask myself..are all these stuff worth buying? I'd be happy enoough just to get the TV, aslong as its 1080p 120HZ.
Ruho
daftrok
Posted 4:13 AM 18/11/08
I agree, focus all the development on the PS3.
daftrok
vivek
Posted 4:13 AM 18/11/08
m th frst t cmmnt :) cl !!!
vivek
justinsane
Posted 5:20 AM 18/11/08
@Novenus: Get off your fucking cross, Novenus. A less-than-perfect execution of integration isn't equivalent to Sony "trying to con their customers into buying integrated components."
Sad, shame? These words are for emo pussies who have grudges to bear, not legitimate critics.
Ride that high horse outta here.
justinsane
Earthslide
Posted 5:05 AM 18/11/08
@vivek: Fuck off you Donkey.
Earthslide
aprather
Posted 5:02 AM 18/11/08
Thank you for this review. Ive found that tossing a computer at my TV has gotten me everything I have needed so far and more, Im still on the lookout for alternative methods to do things.
I had a question in my mind while reading this article though. Does Sony get upset at reviewers that post not-so-favorable reviews?? Do you ever hesitate giving the bad review for fear that you wont get anymore fancy equipment to play with? Or do they say "Thanks so much for this feedback, we will try to do better in the future"
aprather
Ibelieveinsandwitches
Posted 5:02 AM 18/11/08
@deadhouseplantz:
One of the big problems with Sony is that they have become such a big company. They have numerous divisions working on so many projects that it is hard for them to be organized. this is why so many of their products aren't compatible when they should be.
Smaller companies don't have this problem (or at least to the degree Sony does) because they don't put out as many products as Sony, and they can make sure that each of their products is compatible.
Organization is something that Sony has focused on in the past few years, but with such a big company, it really is no easy task.
(I'm not touching Apple)
Ibelieveinsandwitches
Mless
Posted 4:57 AM 18/11/08
@maxentropy: Unless of course you are Sony who can make a bunch of devices that work together and then get people to pay 10x as much to get them all.
Mless
Novenus
Posted 4:55 AM 18/11/08
Sony has always had some 'Link' component going back 20-30 years as they tried to con their customers into buying integrated components of their home theater/audio system... but to read that review on what they consider their top tier items is truly sad.
I will always skip their Bravia line and go directly to boutique items that look good and work well (delivering what they promised) probably at a worthwhile slight price increase. For shame, Sony, for shame.
Novenus
BigDogues
Posted 4:55 AM 18/11/08
Three remotes? Pfft.. there should be only one.
One remote to rule them all and in the darkness bind them!
Umm, sorry.
BigDogues
oyumurtaci
Posted 5:33 AM 18/11/08
@Ruho: Haven't you heard? 200 Hz is the new 120...
oyumurtaci
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 5:32 AM 18/11/08
@vivek: Hah, silly Zune users!
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
oyumurtaci
Posted 5:32 AM 18/11/08
@daftrok: And risk missing the opportunity to develop more proprietary formats for a slew of other products? How dare you suggest that developing a standalone wireless Blu-Ray player with a single USB port and accepting only the new Memory Disc Pro Trio (with adapter) format should be abandoned for one ring... thing to rule them all?
oyumurtaci
ezman
Posted 5:23 AM 18/11/08
@Ibelieveinsandwitches: Agreed. I read an interview with Sony's prez or something like that and he talked about how they have become an absolutely massive company and sometimes they do have products that overlap. This is crazy to me, but it definitely happens.
ezman
WillaEspish
Posted 4:43 AM 18/11/08
When is a vendor going to realize that people have more than one tv in their house and would like to start watching a move with the whole family in the living room, then when the popcorn runs out, let some individually pick up the end of the show from their bedroom or elsewhere while others keep watching in the living room? That is, anything that the main TV can show should also be multicast to all of your other rooms. This effect was trivial with analog and equipment that mostly had a ch3/4 modulator with coax output. But with modern digital equipment it is next to impossible even if you already have a network in place that could easily transport the signal.
WillaEspish
kaikai34
Posted 6:06 AM 18/11/08
starting with me of course.
kaikai34
kaikai34
Posted 6:06 AM 18/11/08
do you get to keep the stuff or do you have to send it back... i'm guessing you get to keep it. you guys should do monthly giveaways to your loyal readers.
kaikai34
imTheKing
Posted 5:58 AM 18/11/08
@blackmage439: I own Bravia XBR5s and they are "technically" the best in quality / picture but for a picture thats just about as good I would go with Samsung. They are also reasonably priced.
imTheKing
blackmage439
Posted 5:49 AM 18/11/08
Nice stuff, but I think I'll be eying LG for my electronics needs. I have been generally happy with the devices LG churns out.
Anyone have a suggestion on the most well-rounded choice for an LCD TV brand, as far as price, quality, and features go? I'm looking for something in the 27-32" range. I also am not sure what's a more important aspect: resolution (1080 vs 720) or interlaced vs progressive scan?
blackmage439
ceilingFANBOY
Posted 5:46 AM 18/11/08
@oyumurtaci: Nah, 200Hz is the new 100Hz. 240Hz is the new 120Hz. It all depends on where you are living.
ceilingFANBOY
Novenus
Posted 6:26 AM 18/11/08
@justinsane: You're a true internets gem. Channel that fear and do something worthwhile with your life away from the computer.
Novenus
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-->
Posted 6:25 AM 18/11/08
@Earthslide: Gordon Ramsay checking in!
Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-->
justinsane
Posted 6:24 AM 18/11/08
@Novenus: I'm fucking your mind right now. Pumping that grey matter vigorously.
justinsane
VideoVampire
Posted 6:22 AM 18/11/08
Most of the functionality could be integrated into the PS3 in an update I would think....oh please ...oh please!!!
VideoVampire
Novenus
Posted 6:17 AM 18/11/08
@justinsane: Right... because you'll buy this crap and I won't it makes me one of the 'emo pussies'. Do you know how consumer product divisions of these corporations work on developing new products and what gets shoved out there? Please. Speak only if you've worked as an engineer for any of the large companies before you talk to me about getting off my 'cross'. Jesus, think of better insults. And no, no pun intended.
Novenus
ichi1
Posted 6:15 AM 18/11/08
:( feel slightly disappointed really (I am a major sony fanboy), 5 in 1 hdmi switch my amp does 3 to 1 switching which makes more sense as it decodes the audio and then chucks the video to the lcd, now thats sensible, this does not have an amp out.
Next DVD player, err thats lame as my PS3 does Bluray and my HDD/DVD recorder does dvd upscaling!
Netsteaming device, err why not buy a mac mini stick it behind your bravia and use itunes or a sony media pc.
A wireless link not compatible with ps3 straight out the ****ing window, how about buy more than one ps3.
Just saying
ichi1
Cordfucious v 2.0.1
Posted 6:09 AM 18/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: hey hey... we all aren't
total idiotic douches
Cordfucious v 2.0.1
colinv12
Posted 7:17 AM 18/11/08
@BigDogues: hahaha Hilarious. I thought it was funny.
colinv12
GTgeek
Posted 7:29 AM 18/11/08
@VideoVampire: Yes, that would be great...except I don't have a sony tv. Having it stream internet content would be nice though, much better than setting up a media server to do that.
GTgeek
GTgeek
Posted 7:27 AM 18/11/08
@Ruho: 120Hz looks strange to me. My friend just bought a nice new tv and it all looks very odd with 120Hz enabled. Maybe I'm just not used to it, but I like the way things look in 60Hz just fine.
GTgeek
Xenocide
Posted 8:35 AM 18/11/08
@GTgeek: The 120Hz is only good for viewing movies displayed in 24Hz without interpolated frames.
Xenocide
Captian_Caveman
Posted 8:17 AM 18/11/08
@WillaEspish: I have a Sony Location Free player and it streams the signal from my cable box and DVD player via my wireless router to my laptop and PSP. Plus I can use either as a remote to control my devices. Sony also sells smaller Location Free battery powered LCD TVs and they even have reciever boxes for connecting regular TVs.
I use mine all the time, especially if I am watching something but I have to run to another room. I just fire up the PSP and tote it with me. Like you mentioned it uses my existing wireless network in my house to broadcast the signal or you can even get a version with WiFi built in... So.. what exactly were you looking for?
Captian_Caveman
Robobagins
Posted 9:02 AM 18/11/08
Was the PS3 not working over the wireless link because of some sort of HDCP handshaking issue? Did you try component?
Anyways, all of this crap seems useless without a decent universal remote. And I'm with you on the PS3 and video channels. It can do so much, they just won't let it.
Robobagins
Taurus_McGee
Posted 8:53 AM 18/11/08
@GTgeek: Couldn't they add in some of this so it wouldn't matter what kind of tv you have? I think just adding the features to the PS3 and letting them go with any TV would be great! I've got a 55" Sony Grand Wega, but does that mean it wouldn't work? Is that what Bravia is supposed to be? Internet-related doohickies, because if so, I didn't realize that's what they were. I thought they were just supposed to be another name for fancy-screened Sony TV's, like Grand Wega, Sharp Aquos, or whomever makes Viera (is that Sony too?).
Taurus_McGee
Taurus_McGee
Posted 8:50 AM 18/11/08
@justinsane:
Not cool and also, very unnecessary. The point of all the Gawker sites is to be able to intelligently speak your mind without someone being rude or petty.
Taurus_McGee
racermd
Posted 10:01 AM 18/11/08
@RacecarBoobTat: Just because it looks like a USB port doesn't mean that it's really a USB port. There's likely a whole different signaling protocol being used that makes using a traditional USB hub impossible.
Of course, I could be wrong. But this is Sony we're talking about, here. Why use something common and ubiquitous when they could lock everyone else out and charge licensing fees by developing something completely non-standard?
racermd
Mark Wilson
Posted 10:22 AM 18/11/08
@Robobagins: HDCP was my first inclination, honestly, and I haven't ruled it out. I don't have component cables to check it, however, and Sony has assured me that it should work.
Mark Wilson
justinsane
Posted 11:28 AM 18/11/08
@Novenus: Haha! You totally fell for it :D
I've got nothing but love for you, Novenus. L-O-V-E!
justinsane
Maxwell's Nylon Hammer
Posted 11:10 AM 18/11/08
@Mark Wilson: Can I just say Mark, your photography is looking great. Nice work.
Sorry about the article, I haven't got time to read it. :(
Maxwell's Nylon Hammer
justinsane
Posted 11:29 AM 18/11/08
@Taurus_McGee: This is an A-B conversation, so you can just C your way out of it, Nosey McGee.
justinsane
Mark Wilson
Posted 2:23 PM 18/11/08
@Maxwell's Nylon Hammer: Ha, thanks Maxwell!
Mark Wilson
Assassin_Kensei
Posted 3:12 PM 18/11/08
@blackmage439: sony is the Best but Samsung LG and Sharp have very good comparable models( I mean quality wise ) at way better prices. Though the Sony's do have the Best Picture, the Sharp LG and Samsung will give you an amazing picture and have a quality product.
Be carefull about LG they make some Great products and some not so great do your research on the model your looking at before you dive in.
Assassin_Kensei
Assassin_Kensei
Posted 3:08 PM 18/11/08
wouldn't buying the TV and a PS3 do the same thing as the TV and the extra 20 components???
Assassin_Kensei
Dandy
Posted 3:00 PM 18/11/08
they need a blu ray player for this...
Dandy
macserv
Posted 4:23 PM 18/11/08
@Ruho: Or, you could get a plasma display, and laugh at all these people who actually care about the refresh rate of an LCD panel.
macserv
GTgeek
Posted 4:13 PM 18/11/08
@Xenocide: ah, ok. It makes regular tv look very strange. Thanks for the tip, I'll mention it to my friend.
GTgeek
DisposableInterloper
Posted 5:04 PM 18/11/08
One really pressing question for me is why the hell doesn't the PS3's XMB merge with the TV's XMB? Sure, it might need yet another DMXe port, but that would be a huge step right there. Then Bravia-exclusive and Playstation-exclusive menu items would all be on one comfortable menu, and redundant items would be cleaned up automagically.
Which reminds me: wasn't there supposed to be some standard to allow home theater gear to seamlessly communicate and integrate with each other? It was supposed to be a 3rd competitor in the HDMI vs DisplayPort arena if I recall. Couldn't Sony just go with that standard instead of half-assing their own in-house solution?
DisposableInterloper
media_lush
Posted 4:54 PM 18/11/08
Dear Mr Sony man reading this - I have a Bravia and this set-up sounds way too complicated.... will not buy....
currently have an Elonex sound bar with built in ipod mount that can display on screen - sounds fantastic and took about a couple of minutes to set-up....
media_lush
00000000
Posted 6:50 PM 18/11/08
Oh man oh man oh man. I h8h8h8 hearing/reading stuff like this. S'because it makes me sad. I'm getting flashbacks of IPhone, PSP, PS3, and even my Helio Ocean. Why can't great products do what everything they can??? S'depressing how many products out there are (illogically... minus thoughts on money) limited by their manufacturers T_T
00000000
kyot
Posted 8:38 PM 18/11/08
I got 2 bravias and a PS3. But only the input link add-on gave me a twitch in the eyebrow, a very small twitch.
kyot
forbetaorworse
Posted 5:47 AM 18/11/08
this is an awesome review. I still do not understand why these electronics companies haven't figured out the whole "one remote is all you need" thing. I refuse to clutter my cave with 10 remotes.
forbetaorworse
PwnageII
Posted 3:10 PM 18/11/08
@vivek:
Dude -- lay off, I got banned for this ONCE already, k, so DON'T DO IT!
PwnageII
DrRosenRosen
Posted 4:39 AM 18/11/08
I think you're right about them being on the right track but it seems a bit clumsy..Couldn't they have one modular unit (like a Cisco router where you can snap different modules into an internal bay). The Internet link could be a PC Express card and my Thinkpad has a removeable DVD drive thats smaller than a piece of toast. When I buy a flatscreen the last thing I want to do is start screwing a bunch of additional boxy components to the back of it.
DrRosenRosen