Science
NASA Scales Up 1966's Moon Image to Amazing Ultra-High Resolution
Posted by Jesus Diaz at 11:19 AM on November 17, 2008
When NASA released this image from their Lunar Orbiter 1 back in 1966, the first photograph ever of the Earth rising above the Moon's surface, it was low resolution but they still amazed the world. This week, they have surprised every space aficionado re-releasing the same image in ultra-high definition. The cool part now is that NASA hasn't used any upscaling or magical infinite zoom-in filter from CSI. Instead, they have created a new technology that uses refurbished analogue machines and a new digital process that fully extracts the information stored in the program's old magnetic tapes, something that was impossible to do in the 60s. Click on the image to watch it in its 3673 x 1740 pixel glory.
The Lunar Orbiter missions included five spacecrafts dedicated to map the entire lunar surface, a task necessary to select the landing sites for Apollo. The first three missions focused on twenty potential landing sites, while the two last ones--which flew high altitude polar orbits--took photographs of 99% of the surface with a resolution that ranged from 60 metres to a stunning 2 metres.
While these probes were not as sophisticated as the HD cameras of the Selene spacecraft developed by the Japanese space agency, the NASA orbiters had a clever imaging system that achieved similar results four decades ago. It included a dual lens camera--one 610 millimetre narrow angle for high resolution and an 80 millimetre wide angle for medium resolution--, a film processor, and a scanner. Both lenses were aligned to expose the same part of the 70 millimetre film roll, so the high resolution image area was centered with the medium resolution area.
This was more complicated that it sounds: Since the spaceship was cruising above the lunar surface, they had to compensate for that motion. Using an electro-optical sensor to measure the distance while a small motor shifted the film so the second exposure exactly matched the first one. After that, the film was processed, scanned, and the information send back to Earth, where it was stored in analogue tapes.
Now, the Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project at NASA's Ames Research Centre, is retrieving and analysing all the data stored in those tapes. To do this, first they restored the original tape recorders and 1,500 of these tapes. Then they digitised the data into modern computer, putting it through special software designed to extract all that information to produce the image you are seeing here. Their goal is to do this with every single image lurking inside those tapes, which then will be mapped to standard coordinates and sent to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.
Their objective is not only preserving and enhancing these historical documents, but also provide the scientific community with refreshed information prior to next year's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission. [NASA]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
Keith Cowing
Posted November 17, 2008 3:53 PM
More information on the Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project can be found at http://www.moonviews.com
shenanigans61
Posted 1:54 PM 17/11/08
Can't get the whole thing to fit, (only Earth) but damn that's a nice background.
shenanigans61
Logan5
Posted 1:54 PM 17/11/08
Fake- Obvious Photoshop...
Oh, thought I was on Macrumors...
Logan5
P3nnst8r
Posted 1:51 PM 17/11/08
@Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine: I can see the forested area where my house currently resides!
P3nnst8r
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
Posted 1:48 PM 17/11/08
@P3nnst8r: That is, if it was built in 1966 :D
Kaiser-Machead's Cookie-Powered LEGO Machine
rockstarjoe
Posted 1:48 PM 17/11/08
Cool, new iphone wallpaper.
rockstarjoe
aerospaceman
Posted 1:47 PM 17/11/08
great, so we don't need to put three more people up on the Moon, let's focus instead on developing a strong manned presence in Earth orbit and a reliable way to get us there.
aerospaceman
P3nnst8r
Posted 1:32 PM 17/11/08
I can see my house!
P3nnst8r
Jesus Diaz
Posted 1:32 PM 17/11/08
@Mr.Purple: Actually, the problem is that even if they had the tapes, the TV camera used for the landings was actually shit (compared to today's standards).
Jesus Diaz
Mr.Purple
Posted 1:29 PM 17/11/08
If only they would do this to the video of the first moon walk...
Problem is, they lost the tapes.
Mr.Purple
KarinLovesYou
Posted 1:25 PM 17/11/08
That is absolutely stunning. Props, NASA. Props.
KarinLovesYou
unkpku has a really long fucking screenname because i saw some o
Posted 1:25 PM 17/11/08
Eye candy is so fattening...
unkpku has a really long fucking screenname because i saw some other people do it
LiviaSnake
Posted 2:19 PM 17/11/08
@Yetibelle: really?
LiviaSnake
Yetibelle
Posted 2:13 PM 17/11/08
So this 1966 satallite had a Photo-Mart in it? Not only taking the pictures, devloping them, then some analog scanner that sent that image back to earth?
FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE.FAKE
Yetibelle
segamanxero
Posted 2:12 PM 17/11/08
@Wess: hey ive been looking for a monitor like that, where you buy that at?
segamanxero
shan6
Posted 2:10 PM 17/11/08
@pdok: That was my first thought as well.
shan6
snowbeach024
Posted 2:03 PM 17/11/08
@P3nnst8r: haha
the sad thing is..kids from now on will be like.."what's the big deal? i can see earth and my house better on google earth."
snowbeach024
Logan5
Posted 2:01 PM 17/11/08
If you want to make it a desktop image, it works better if you rotate 90 degrees and crop from there.
Logan5
pdok
Posted 2:00 PM 17/11/08
Am I the only one who is amazed at the "scanned and sent back to Earth" part? So there's a spaceship orbiting the moon that still has the original films in it? Cool.
pdok
Wess
Posted 1:57 PM 17/11/08
Great for my new 1740:3673 monitor! Can't believe the perfect fit!
Wess
heroineworshipper
Posted 1:57 PM 17/11/08
U can't beat the future proofing of analog.
heroineworshipper
aec007
Posted 2:40 PM 17/11/08
@Yetibelle:
It's about time that you realize 1960's NASA is not 2000's NASA.
They were more inventive them. They more resourceful.
No budget constrains... just goals at all costs.
They took us to the moon and back. Several times.
And after the shuttle is done in another 9 flights... We go back to 1960's rockets Ares V direct copy of Saturn V.
aec007
P3nnst8r
Posted 2:33 PM 17/11/08
@kmkl:
yo listen up here's a story
about a little guy that lives in a blue world
and all day and all night and everything he sees
is just blue like him inside and outside
blue his house with a blue little window
and a blue corvette
and everything is blue for him and his self
and everybody around
cos he ain't got nobody to listen to
I'm blue da ba dee da ba die...
P3nnst8r
P3nnst8r
Posted 2:30 PM 17/11/08
@snowbeach024: Psh. Not to mention being in color.
P3nnst8r
kmkl
Posted 2:27 PM 17/11/08
A wallpaper friendly version, just the earth though, and I popped some colour in there.
[h4xr.org] enjoy!
kmkl
Yetibelle
Posted 2:24 PM 17/11/08
@LiviaSnake: Well who knows they crashed them all into the moon after they took the pictures.
"The Lunar Orbiters were all eventually commanded to crash on the Moon before their attitude control gas ran out so they would not present navigational or communications hazards to later Apollo flights."
via Wiki
Yetibelle
devilonsteroids
Posted 3:02 PM 17/11/08
@pdok: I can't get over the complicated process!! Shoot (while moving film for movement), develop!!!! - i mean has anyone taken photo class?!? thats like 4 steps in itself. THEN scan. Crazy town.
devilonsteroids
bjarnia
Posted 3:32 PM 17/11/08
@rockstarjoe: Sweet idea! When I first saw that I thought "damnit, wrong aspect ratio for wallpaper!", didn't think of my iphone!
Do you know what resolution iphone backgrounds should be?
bjarnia
smartboydan hates college
Posted 3:29 PM 17/11/08
@kmkl: It's too small.
DAMN MY HIGH DEFINITION MONITOR!!!!
Aw, It's okay baby, I love you anyway. *Hugs Laptop*
smartboydan hates college
asdfsdf
Posted 3:23 PM 17/11/08
@segamanxero: The hard part is really finding the driver.
asdfsdf
asdfsdf
Posted 3:22 PM 17/11/08
@P3nnst8r: Wait, your house is on the moon?
asdfsdf
anderlan
Posted 3:13 PM 17/11/08
This is so Star Trek. It's like when they take someone's antiquated technology and do something hardcore with it. Like, using a tricorder to pull all the data off a shutdown old ship or probe, just reading the tape or disk at a distance (in the crewmember's hand) via some sort of hardcore EM interference mechanism. Or Tuvok using a tricorder (again) to vape all of Sarah Silverman's 1999 era computers to erase observations of Voyager in orbit.
anderlan
USB_Humping_Dog
Posted 3:10 PM 17/11/08
Wasn't tech like this mentioned in one of Tom Clancy's books?
USB_Humping_Dog
jacobestes
Posted 3:57 PM 17/11/08
@Mr.Purple: From what I understand, they considered it briefly but decided the cost outweighed the benefit since the tapes will stop working after the HD switch.
jacobestes
XerxesQados
Posted 3:48 PM 17/11/08
@anderlan: Star Trek did for technology what The Simpsons did for comedic plots. "This is so Star Trek" is a given whenever something new is developed.
XerxesQados
bjarnia
Posted 3:46 PM 17/11/08
iPhone background version:
[www.steik.org]
bjarnia
jkr's bold comment
Posted 3:41 PM 17/11/08
so, does China still have the most detailed photos of the moon?
jkr's bold comment
Dreamwriter
Posted 4:20 PM 17/11/08
@Jesus Diaz: Doesn't matter, they'd still be 10,000 times better than what we have. What we have is a recording of a TV camera pointing at a monitor. They couldn't use direct video at the time, because they used special high quality cameras that were way better than broadcast TV cameras, so they displayed the real output on a monitor and then pointed the TV cameras at that monitor.
Dreamwriter
pretol
Posted 4:15 PM 17/11/08
"enhance... zoom-in... enhance... zoom in... enhance.... zoom-in... enhance... zooom-in..." and so on
pretol
winexprt
Posted 4:14 PM 17/11/08
NASA =
(N) ever
(A) a
(S) traight
(A) nswer
:-)
winexprt
Toshie
Posted 4:13 PM 17/11/08
@Wess: Several monitors allow you to use them in portrait mode. I have a Samsung 22" that actually allows you to swivel it on the fly if you so desire (I don't).
Besides, there is no up or down in space. Rotate the image 90 degrees and be done with it.
Toshie
JDate
Posted 4:44 PM 17/11/08
So it took them 42 years to effectively retouch out all visible alien ships, moonbases and non-human structures.
JDate
thefutureisnow
Posted 5:13 PM 17/11/08
@Logan5: You're right, it is obviously a fake, but it can't be a photoshop because photoshop wasn't arround in the 60's. IMO the moon landing was an inside job.
thefutureisnow
commentotron
Posted 5:38 PM 17/11/08
@devilonsteroids:
It was the 1960s man. They had to invent this shit from scratch. There was no uber digital anything. Analog FTW!
commentotron
thefutureisnow
Posted 5:38 PM 17/11/08
@P3nnst8r: Oh great, not that again.
thefutureisnow
commentotron
Posted 5:37 PM 17/11/08
@Dreamwriter:
"They couldn't use direct video at the time, because they used special high quality cameras that were way better than broadcast TV cameras"
No. The video camera used on the Apollo 11 mission was crap even by the standards of the day. It had to be small, and consume hardly any power. It was a unique one-off technology that required an elaborate scan converter to make usable by broadcasters.
The achievement in the technology was in the size and power foot print, not in image quality.
commentotron
vgart
Posted 5:34 PM 17/11/08
@Yetibelle:
Ya, whatever. You are FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE
vgart
Ooglez
Posted 5:22 PM 17/11/08
@JDate: Yeah.. and the hollywood set...
Ooglez
Sasquatch
Posted 5:49 PM 17/11/08
Please don't let Sarah Palin see this image...
Sasquatch
PresidenToor
Posted 7:17 PM 17/11/08
I never would of guessed the Earth had such a non-uniform curviture. It could be the "upscaling" of sorts used.
PresidenToor
gadjitfreek
Posted 8:58 PM 17/11/08
I can't believe there is anyone who regularly visits this site who actually still believes that the moon missions were faked. These tend to be the same people who will believe in a divine creator without a shred of evidence. Mythbusters did a great job of busting this particularly vile bit of paranoid fantasy. We were there. Get over it.
gadjitfreek
jutzuro
Posted 8:45 PM 17/11/08
Who cares? it's fake
jutzuro
Satorical
Posted 8:40 PM 17/11/08
Does anyone have a current source on how much of NASA's old data is going to be lost to irretrievable formats or other problems?
Satorical
mricyfire
Posted 10:06 PM 17/11/08
They can't just take a new picture?
mricyfire
tamoko
Posted 11:23 PM 17/11/08
@Yetibelle: Let me guess.. You were the dude on the grassy knoll, right?
tamoko
Curves
Posted 12:35 AM 18/11/08
@Mr.Purple: They may have lost the tapes, but something I wont EVER lose is the memory of sitting (to close to the TV) with my child eyes glued to the screen watching it as it happened. My mother told us to remember what we saw that day and that someday we would tell our grandchildren about it, and she was right.
Curves
Pixelologist
Posted 1:56 AM 18/11/08
@asdfsdf: Heh. Wait! What's that big ball rising over the moon's horizon?
Pixelologist
CGizmo
Posted 1:52 AM 18/11/08
Is there any chance to know what part of the Earth is photographed there?
CGizmo
lol123
Posted 2:14 AM 18/11/08
@thefutureisnow: [www.badastronomy.com]
lol123
MINI Driver
Posted 2:08 AM 18/11/08
@gadjitfreek: Unfortunately the facts never seem to get in the way for the vast tide of idiots that believe the conspiracy theory cr@p!
MINI Driver
vicsells
Posted 5:50 AM 18/11/08
I CALL PSHOP!!!
I still don't think America has ever been to the moon...too many dishonest peepers in power
vicsells
ideaman2020
Posted 7:18 AM 18/11/08
@Curves: You and me, both, sister. Except my parents weren't telling me to remember it, it just burned itself into my brain.
PS, the tapes aren't lost. They're just sitting unlocated in a warehouse somewhere. Think Raiders of the Lost Ark... [Well... ok... I guess that would count as lost... *sigh*.]
ideaman2020
infmom
Posted 7:29 AM 18/11/08
@Curves: I remember waiting all day for Armstrong to emerge. And then after watching him on the lunar surface, stepping outside and looking up at the moon and thinking "There are people up there."
I was in college at the time.
infmom
ypctx
Posted 7:55 AM 18/11/08
@bjarnia: thanks.
also, first time I see the mighty DPI of iPhone's display - or the shitty DPI of my older IBM LCD.
ypctx
ypctx
Posted 7:54 AM 18/11/08
@pretol: not sure what you mean but it reminded me of the photo enhancing scene in Blade Runner.
ypctx
misterwho
Posted 8:21 AM 18/11/08
Dang, the earth is one sexy planet.
misterwho
russdanger
Posted 8:54 AM 18/11/08
Yes, this is obviously a giant paper cut-out of the the Earth suspended by balloon over the Arizona desert. I can't believe that people are naive enough to fall for this sort of thing.
russdanger
BiZarRroBALlmeR
Posted 12:06 PM 18/11/08
@pdok: high def poloroids?
BiZarRroBALlmeR
BiZarRroBALlmeR
Posted 12:03 PM 18/11/08
These babies were huge, sir!... Enormous!... Oh, God! You wouldn't believe it!
BiZarRroBALlmeR
FiveLiters
Posted 12:44 PM 18/11/08
How'd they get the Google Earth car up THERE????
FiveLiters
kmkl
Posted 2:51 PM 18/11/08
@smartboydan hates college:
How big is your laptop? 30 inches?!? or is the pixel density super high?
kmkl
rlee
Posted 3:32 PM 18/11/08
A-ha! I knew there had to be alien technology involved in those missions. Want proof? Just check out those weird symbols at the bottom. Looks like some kinda numbering system, but it obviously ain't Terran.
rlee
Wess
Posted 8:16 AM 19/11/08
@segamanxero: I think it was a Circuit City clearance sale.
Wess
three60guy
Posted 2:23 PM 17/11/08
ahhhhh, I can see where they used Photoshop to take away the McDonalds sign there at the moon. The Martians didn't like it so they hired someone to do it. So even the man in the moon has some competition. sigh.
three60guy
LorenzoJagabat
Posted 1:29 AM 18/11/08
@pdok: @pdok: Um, sorry, lunar satellites are unstable and eventually crash sooner rather than later. Go to this link to find the date each lunar orbiter became a lunar impactor... http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/loinfo.txt A side note - if you look carefully at the high res version you can STILL make out the tiling from where the different strips were stitched together into one gigantic mural. This was VERY obvious in the original. Still a little processing left to do...
LorenzoJagabat