Comments on: A Visual Look at the Nokia Damage Test Labs

By: mattress

mattress — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:03:44 +0000

That looks pretty cool

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:59:04 +0000

@AL
"visual look" means pics, most "look"s are just text.

By: Roulette Systems

Roulette Systems — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:56:43 +0000

Can’t beat a N95

By: erv

erv — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:14:49 +0000

I had a 6680 that I’ve had for about four years. I dropped that thing at least four times a week. One time it fell from the top of my jeep(I put my phone there while I was looking for my keys, forgot about it and drove off), It’s also been dropped into rain puddles. Well… what I’m trying to say is.. Nokia is the best and most durable. Hands down

By: Annonymouse

Annonymouse — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:09:14 +0000

@CJ
ZING!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:12:14 +0000

/thread

By: Roj Ash

Roj Ash — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:32:20 +0000

Shame they don’t have a test to see if you can read the display outdoors on a sunny day – my last two Nokias were useless unless you could find a shady place.

By: Stampy

Stampy — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:14:57 +0000

I wish I still had my Nokia rubber boots. They probably went through just as rigorous testing. The ability to withstand liquids was probably the most important. But nowadays as Nokia only manifactures cellphones they seem to have forgotten that. Atleast the earlier models had pretty good protection from wet environments, like the rubber boots made in the early 80s; they could really withstand walking through a puddle.

By: Bill in Detroit

Bill in Detroit — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:04:04 +0000

Cj is right. Besides which, you were supposed to change out of the wetsuit before going horseback riding. Heavens only knows what the horse was thinking!

By: Ric

Ric — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:10:14 +0000

I have the extremely thin 5320 Music Express, and the durability is remarkable. I am very happy with it.